Water, Air, and Soil Pollution

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 229–234 | Cite as

Effects of the pesticides thiotox, dichlorvos and carbofuran on the test fishMystus vittatus

  • S. R. Verma
  • Sarita Rani
  • S. K. Bansal
  • R. C. Dalela
Article

Abstract

A quantitative index of synergism, antagonism and additivity has been measured experimentally in the fishMystus vittatus for three pesticides viz. Thiotox (Endosulfan) (T), Dichlorvos (D) and Carbofuran (C). For a combination of two pesticides, the dose of the one pesticide of a pair was fixed at the no-effect level while the dose of the second pesticide was increased until the entire dose response curve was obtained. To evaluate interactions of three pesticides, the previous pair of pesticides was kept fixed at their combined TLO level, and the third pesticide was increased and again a dose-response curve was obtained. From the results obtained, it is shown that a particular combination could be synergistic, antagonistic or additive, depending on the relative doses employed. In the present study (T + D)/C combination was most synergistic (toxic) in nature while D/T and C/T were least toxic or antagonistic in their effects. However, T/D, (C + T)/D, C/D and D/C combinations were additive in nature. (D + T)/C, (D + C)/T, (T + C)/D and (C + D)/T combinations were found less synergistic in nature than (T + D)/C.

Keywords

Response Curve Dose Response Endosulfan Dose Response Curve Carbofuran 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Fabacher, D. L.: 1976,Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 16, 376.Google Scholar
  2. Koening, C. C.: 1975, The effects of DDT and mirex alone and in combination on the reproduction of a salt marsh Cyprinodont. FishAdinia xenica. Thesis, Florida State Univ., Tallahassee.Google Scholar
  3. Lech, J. J.: 1974,Biochem. Pharmacol. 23, 2403.Google Scholar
  4. Lech, J. J., Pepple, S. K. and Anderson, M.: 1973,Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 25, 542.Google Scholar
  5. Macek, K. J.: 1975,Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 14, 648.Google Scholar
  6. Marking, L. L. and Mauck, W. L.: 1975,Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 13, 518.Google Scholar
  7. Mayer, F. L., Jr., Street, J. C., and Neuhold, J. M.: 1972,Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 22, 347.Google Scholar
  8. Reinhold, K. A.: 1975,Dissertation Abs. 55, 75, 11545.Google Scholar
  9. Roales, R. R. and Perlmutter, A.: 1974,Bull. Environ. Contain. Toxicol. 12, 475.Google Scholar
  10. Schmidt, D. C. and Weber, L. J.: 1973,J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 30, 1310.Google Scholar
  11. Schubert, J., Riley, E. J., and Tyler, S. A.: 1978.J. Toxicol. Environ. Hlth. 4, 763.Google Scholar
  12. Statham, C. N. and Lech, J. J.: 1975,Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 34, 83.Google Scholar
  13. Verma, S. R., Sarita Rani, Bansal, S. K. and Dalela, R. C.: 1979, Evaluation of comparative toxicity of thiotox, dichlorvos and carbofuran to two fresh water teleostsOphiocephalus punctatus andMystus vittatus. Environ. Pollut. (Comm.).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Co. 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. R. Verma
    • 1
  • Sarita Rani
    • 1
  • S. K. Bansal
    • 1
  • R. C. Dalela
    • 1
  1. 1.Pollution Relevant Research Lab., Department of ZoologyD.A.V. (P.G.) CollegeMuzaffarnagarIndia

Personalised recommendations