Advertisement

Computers and the Humanities

, Volume 29, Issue 5, pp 363–374 | Cite as

Weighing the evidence: Legal discourse in the 19th-Century Spanish feminist Concepción Arenal

  • Estelle Irizarry
Article
  • 40 Downloads

Abstract

In her remarkable 1861 book,The Woman of the Future, Concepción Arenal appropriated legal discourse, a wholly male domain, to plead the case for women's rights, in particular, education. Two different types of legal discourse emerge in her writing: that of written legislative law and that of courtroom advocacy. The computer can gather evidence of both; however, each mode of discourse requires different measures to weigh the significance of the findings. Easily obtainable repeat rates serve as an useful measure that can be related to what recognition psychologists call “retention intervals” and that are easily understood by non-statistically oriented literary scholars. Analysis focuses on Arenal's use of typography, lexicon, repetition, ideological challenge, interactive discourse, and prescriptive speech acts of the legal register to advocate the cause of women in nineteenth-century Spain.

Key words

feminism Spain essay journalism law discourse analysis female writing male writing stylistic analysis essay repeat rates 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arenal de García Carrasco, Concepción.Ensayo sobre el derecho de gentes. Madrid: V. Suarez, 1895.Google Scholar
  2. Arenal de García Carrasco, Concepción.La mujer del porvenir. InLa emancipación de la mujer en España. Ed. Mauro Armiño. Madrid: Jucar, 1974, pp. 97–188.Google Scholar
  3. Arenal de García Carrasco, Concepción. “Spain”.The Woman Question in Europe. Ed. and trans. Theodore Stanton. New York: G. P. Putnam, 1884, pp. 330–53.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, John. “An Analysis of Recognition and Recall and of Problems in Their Comparison”. InRecall and Recognition. Ed. John Brown. London: John Wiley, 1976, pp. 1–36.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, John, ed.Recall and Recognition. London: John Wiley, 1976.Google Scholar
  6. Campo Alange, Condesade.Concepción Arenal en el origen de unos cambios sociales. Madrid: Fundación Universitaria Española. 1975.Google Scholar
  7. Castellanos, Rosario.Mujer que sabe latín. México, D. F.: Secretaría de Educación Pública (SepSetentas), 1973, pp. 7–46.Google Scholar
  8. García Hoz, Víctor.Vocabulario usual, vocabulario común y vocabulario fundamental. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas Instituto “San José de Calasanz”, 1953.Google Scholar
  9. Gibbons, John, ed.Language and the Law. London: Longman, 1994.Google Scholar
  10. Gibbons, John. “Introduction: Language Constructing Law”. In Gibbons,Language and the Law, pp. 3–10.Google Scholar
  11. Gibbons, John. “Introduction: Language and Disadvantage before the Law”. In Gibbons,Language and the Law, pp. 195–98.Google Scholar
  12. Goldfield, Joel. “An Argument for Single-Author and Similar Studies Using Quantitative Methods: Is There Safety in Numbers?”Computers and the Humanities, 27, 5–6 (1993–94), 365–74.Google Scholar
  13. Harris, Sandra. “Ideological Exchanges in British Magistrates Courts”. In Gibbons,Language and the Law, pp. 156–70.Google Scholar
  14. Irizarry, Estelle. “Concepción Arenal (1820–1893)”. InSpanish Women Writers. Eds. Linda Gould Levine, Ellen Engelson Marson, and Gloria Waldman. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1993, pp. 44–53.Google Scholar
  15. Irizarry, Estelle. “A Computer-Assisted Investigation of Gender-Related Idiolect in Octavio Paz and Rosario Castellanos”.Computers and the Humanities, 26, 2 (1992), 103–17.Google Scholar
  16. Joeres, Ruth-Ellen Boetcher. “The Passionate Essay: Radical Feminist Essayists”. In Joeres and Mittman,The Politics of the Essay, pp. 51–71.Google Scholar
  17. Joeres, Ruth-Ellen Boetcher and Elizabeth Mittman. “An Introductory Essay”. InThe Politics of the Essay: Feminist Perspectives. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1993, pp. 12–20.Google Scholar
  18. Johnstone, Barbara et al.Repetition in Discourse: Disciplinary Perspectives. Ed. Barbara Johnstone. Vol. 1. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1994. 2 vols.Google Scholar
  19. Juilland, Alphonse and E. Chang-Rodríguez.Frequency Dictionary of Spanish Words. The Hague: Mouton, 1964.Google Scholar
  20. Lockhart, Robert S., Fergus I. M. Craik and Larry Jacoby. “Depth of Processing, Recognition and Recall”. In Brown,Recall and Recognition, pp. 75–102.Google Scholar
  21. Maley, Yon. “The Language of the Law”. In Gibbons,Language and the Law. London: Longman, 1994, pp. 11–50Google Scholar
  22. Mellinkoff, David.The Language of the Law. Boston: Little, Brown, 1963.Google Scholar
  23. Merritt, Marilyn. “Repetition in Situated Discourse — Exploring Its Forms and Functions in Situated Discourse”. In Johnstone,Repetition in Discourse, pp. 23–36.Google Scholar
  24. MicroConcord. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993. Computer Software.Manual by Simon Murison-Bowie.Google Scholar
  25. Miguel, Jesús M. de and Melissa G. Moyer.Sociology in Spain. Current Sociology, 27, 1 (1979). Special issue.Google Scholar
  26. Mill, John Stuart.The Subjection of Women. Cambridge: M.I.T., 1970.Google Scholar
  27. Moneva y Puyol, Juan.Introducción al derecho hispánico. 3rd ed. Barcelona: Labor, 1942.Google Scholar
  28. MTAS. Ian Lancashire and Lidio Presutti. Toronto: University of Toronto, 1988. Computer Software.Google Scholar
  29. Muller, Charles.Estadística Lingüística. Madrid: Gredos, 1973.Google Scholar
  30. Pániker, Salvador. “El debate sobre la eutanasia”.Anthropos, 157 (1994), 90.Google Scholar
  31. Potter, Rosanne. “From Literary Output to Literary Criticism: Discovering Shaw's Rhetoric”.Computers and the Humanities, 25, 4–5 (1989), 333–40.Google Scholar
  32. Rojas, Lourdes and Nancy Saporta Sternbach. “Latin American Essayists: ‘Intruders and Usurpers.’” In Joeres and Mittman,The Politics of the Essay, pp. 172–95.Google Scholar
  33. Rodríguez-Bou, Ismael.Recuento de vocabulario español. Vol. 1. Río Piedras, PR: University of Puerto Rico, 1952.Google Scholar
  34. Sagrada Biblia. Eloíno Nácar Fuster and Alberto Colunga. Madrid: Bibioteca de Autores Cristianos, 1969.Google Scholar
  35. Snyder, John.Prospects of Power. Tragedy, Satire, the Essay, and the Theory of Genre. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1991.Google Scholar
  36. Thompson, John B.Studies in the Theory of Ideology. Oxford: Polity Press, 1984.Google Scholar
  37. WordCruncher. American Forks, UT: Johnston & Co., 1992. Computer Software.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Estelle Irizarry
    • 1
  1. 1.Spanish DepartmentGeorgetown UniversityWashington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations