Advertisement

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 69–76 | Cite as

Reduction mammaplasty by central pedicle flap with short submammary scar

  • Keuk Shun Shin
  • Seum Chung
  • Hye Kyung Lee
  • Jae Duk Lew
Article

Abstract

Reduction mammaplasty was performed in 30 patients by combining the central pedicle flap method with the short submammary scar (3-S) technique to avoid the common drawbacks of currently popular dermoglandular procedures. Reduction was accomplished by using perforating vascular branches from the pectoralis major muscle and its fascia supplying the nipple and breast parenchyme instead of the subdermal plexus. The central vascular pedicle supplying the nipple-areola complex was preserved. Only the periphery of the breast parenchyme was resected circumferentially, with the exception of the inferolateral portion, so as not to injure the sensory nerve. The remaining breast parenchyme was preserved in an inverted cone shape. The nipple-areola complex was safely transposed with great freedom, and the amount of resection was accurately adjusted for symmetry. No cases of nipple-areola complex sensory change occurred postoperatively, and lactation is possible because of preservation of the lactiferous ducts. The length of postoperative scars was reduced by using the short submammary scar technique. We believe this combined method is ideal in patients requiring resections ranging from 200 to 600 g per breast with good skin elasticity and moderate degree of ptosis.

Key words

Central pedicle Short submammary scar Sensory preservation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Arie G: Una nueva tecnica de mastoplastia. Rev Lat Am Chirurg 1962Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Balch CR: The central mound technique for reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg67:305, 1981Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bostwick J: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. St. Louis: Quality Medical Publishing, 1990, p. 293Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Georgiade NG, Georgiade GS, Riefkohl R: Esthetic breast surgery. In: McCarthy JG (ed): Plastic Surgery. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1990, p. 3843Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hester TR, Bostwick J, Miller L, Cunningham SJ: Breast reduction utilizing the maximally vascularized central breast pedicle. Plast Reconstr Surg76:890, 1985Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Levet Y: The pure posterior pedicle procedure for breast reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg86:67, 1990Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    McKissock PK: Reduction mammaplasty with a vertical dermal flap. Plast Reconstr Surg49:245, 1972Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pitanguy I: Une nouvelle technique de plastie mammaire. Etude de 245 cas consecutifs et presentation d'une technique personelle. Ann Chirurg Plast3:22, 1967Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schwarzmann E: Die technik der mammaplastik. Chirurgica2:932, 1930Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shin KS, Lee HK, Chung S, Lew JD: Reduction mammaplasty with short submammary scar (S-S-S) technique. Aesth Plast Surg16:109, 1992Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Skoog T: A technique of breast reconstruction: transposition of the nipple on a cutaneous vascular pedicle. Acta Chir Scand126:453, 1963Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Strombeck JO: Mammaplasty: report of a new technique based on a two-pedicle procedure. Br J Plast Surg13:79, 1960Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sykes PA: The nerve supply of the human nipple. J Anat105:201, 1969Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Thorek M: Possibilities in the reduction of the human form. NY Med J116:572, 1922Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Keuk Shun Shin
    • 1
  • Seum Chung
    • 1
  • Hye Kyung Lee
    • 1
  • Jae Duk Lew
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryYonsei University College of Medicine, Severance HospitalSeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations