Advertisement

Pharmaceutisch Weekblad

, Volume 2, Issue 1, pp 557–561 | Cite as

Rapid and selective theophylline serum and saliva assay by means of high pressure liquid chromatography

  • J. H. G. Jonkman
  • R. Schoenmaker
  • J. E. Greying
  • R. A. de Zeeuw
Original Articles

Abstract

A rapid, selective and sensitive high pressure liquid Chromatographic (HPLC) method for the determination of theophylline in human serum (or plasma) and saliva was developed.

When using 0.5 ml of serum, concentrations down to 0.4 mg.l−1 could be accurately measured. Each sample requires only about 15 minutes for the completion of the assay, including sample preparation. The actual chromatography time is about 8 minutes. The theophylline metabolites and other xanthines, as theobromine, caffeine (and its metabolite paraxanthine) are well separated. The sensitivity, precision and accuracy are sufficient for routine monitoring of therapeutic theophylline serum levels in patients (approximately 10 to 20 mg.l−1). Reliability of the method was demonstrated during analysis of about 3000 samples on the same column.

Keywords

Liquid Chromatography Serum Level Caffeine Theophylline Human Serum 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bemd, A. A. J. van Den, M. J. L. M. van Gorp andM. C. C. Verhoof (1978)Pharm. Weekblad 113, 424–428.Google Scholar
  2. Cooper, M. J., B. L. Mirkin andM. W. Anders (1977)J. Chromatog. 143, 324–326.Google Scholar
  3. Danhof, M., B. M. J. Loomans andD. D. Breimer (1978)Pharm. Weekblad 113, 672–676.Google Scholar
  4. Franconi, L. C., G. L. Hawk, B. J. Sandmann andW. G. Haney (1976)Anal. Chem. 48, 372–376.Google Scholar
  5. Hendeles, L., M. Weinberger andG. Johnson (1978)Clin. Pharmacokin. 3, 294–312.Google Scholar
  6. Hill, R. E. (1977)J. Chromatog. 135, 419–425.Google Scholar
  7. Jonkman, J. H. G., W.Chr. Berg, R.Schoenmaker, R. A.de Zeeuw, J. E.Greving and N. G. M.Orie (1980)Europ. J. Clin. Pharmacol. (accepted).Google Scholar
  8. Kelly, R. C., D. E. Prentice andG. M. Hearne (1978)Clin. Chem. 24, 838–839.Google Scholar
  9. Manion, C. V., D. W. Shoeman andD. L. Azarnoff (1974)J. Chromatog. 101, 169–174.Google Scholar
  10. Nelson, J. W., A. L. Cordry, C. G. Aron andR. A. Bartell (1977)Clin. Chem. 23, 124–126.Google Scholar
  11. Ogilvie, R. I. (1978)Clin. Pharmacokin. 3, 267–293.Google Scholar
  12. Orcutt, J. J., P. P. Kozak, S. A. Gillman andL. H. Cummins (1977)Clin. Chem. 23, 599–601.Google Scholar
  13. Peng, G. W., M. A. F. Gadalla andW. L. Chiou (1978)Clin. Chem. 24, 357–360.Google Scholar
  14. Peng, G. W., V. Smith, A. Peng andW. L. Chiou (1976)Res. Commun. Chem. Path. Pharmacol. 15, 341–354.Google Scholar
  15. Schwertner, H. A., T. M. Ludden andJ. E. Wallace (1976)Anal. Chem. 48, 1875–1878.Google Scholar
  16. Soldin, S. J., andJ. G. Hill (1977)Clin. Biochem. 10, 74–77.Google Scholar
  17. Sved, S., andD. L. Wilson (1977)Res. Commun. Chem. Pathol. Pharmacol. 17, 319–331.Google Scholar
  18. Thompson, R. D., H. T. Nagasawa andJ. W. Jenne (1974)J. Lab. and Clin. Med. 84, 584–593.Google Scholar
  19. Weinberger, M., andC. Chidsey (1975)Clin. Chem. 21, 834–837.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Bohn, Scheltema & Holkema 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. H. G. Jonkman
    • 1
    • 2
  • R. Schoenmaker
    • 2
  • J. E. Greying
    • 1
  • R. A. de Zeeuw
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Pharmaceutical and Analytical ChemistryUniversity of GroningenAW GroningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Laboratory for Drug AnalysisGW AssenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations