Evolutionary Ecology

, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 136–145 | Cite as

Parthenocarpic fruits in wild parsnip: Decoy defence against a specialist herbivore

  • Arthur R. Zangerl
  • May R. Berenbaum
  • James K. Nitao


Parthenocarpy, the production of fruits without viable seeds, is a widespread phenomenon in plants. While failure to effect pollination or fertilization is often cited as the cause of parthenocarpy, this explanation alone is inadequate to explain why plants produce, maintain and further develop fruits. Wild parsnips (Pastinaca sativa) frequently produce parthenocarpic fruit. When parsnip webworms (Depressaria pastinacella), specialist feeders on wild parsnip, were given choices between normal fruit and parthenocarpic fruit, they exhibited a strong preference for parthenocarpic fruit. However, on parthenocarpic fruit, insects fed less efficiently and grew more slowly than insects fed normal fruit. Parthenocarpic fruits, then, may act as decoys that divert herbivores away from fruits that contain plant offspring.


Parthenocarpy fruits defence wild parsnip Pastinaca sativa parsnip webworm Depressaria pastinacella furanocoumarins decoys 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allen, S. E. (ed) (1974)Chemical Analysis of Ecological Materials. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  2. Berenbaum, M. R. (1981) Patterns of furanocoumarin production and insect herbivory in a population of wild parsnip (Pastinaca sativa L.).Oecologia 49, 236–44.Google Scholar
  3. Berenbaum, M. R., Zangerl, A. R. and Lee, K. (1989) Chemical barriers to adaptation by a specialist herbivore.Oecologia 80, 501–6.Google Scholar
  4. Berenbaum, M. R., Zangerl, A. R. and Nitao, J. K. (1984) Variation in seed furanocoumarin content within wild parsnip (Pastinaca sativa).Phytochemistry 23, 1809–10.Google Scholar
  5. Berenbaum, M. R., Zangerl, A. R. and Nitao, J. K. (1986) Constraints on chemical coevolution: wild parsnips and the parsnip webworm.Evolution 40, 1215–28.Google Scholar
  6. Brittain, W. H. and Gooderham, C. B. (1916) An insect enemy of the parsnip.Can. Entom. 2, 37–41.Google Scholar
  7. Darwin, C. (1876)The Variation of Animals and Plants Under Domestication. 2nd Ed. D. Appleton and Co, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  8. Fagri, K. and L. Van Der Pijl. (1979)The Principles of Pollination Ecology. Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  9. Feinsinger, P. (1978) Ecological interactions between plants and hummingbirds in a successional tropical community.Ecol. Monogr. 48, 269–87.Google Scholar
  10. Harper, J. L. and White, J. (1974) The demography of plants.Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 5, 419–63.Google Scholar
  11. Hawthorn, L. R., Bohart, G. E. and Toole, E. H. (1956) Carrot seed yield and germination as affected by different levels of insect pollination.Proc. Amer. Soc. Ag. Sci. 67, 384–9.Google Scholar
  12. Hendrix, S. D. (1979) Compensatory reproduction in a biennial herb following insect defoliation.Oecologia.42, 107–118.Google Scholar
  13. Hodges, R. W. (1974)The Moths of America North of Mexico: Gelechioidea Oecophoridea. Classey Ltd. and R.B.D. Publications Inc., London, UK.Google Scholar
  14. Jermy, T. (1984) Evolution of insect/plant relationships.Amer. Natur. 124, 609–30.Google Scholar
  15. Ladygina, E. Y., Makarova, V. A. and Ignat'eva, N. S. (1970) Morphological and anatomical description ofPastinaca sativa fruit and localization of furanocoumarins in them.Farmatsyia (Moscow)19, 39–46.Google Scholar
  16. Murray, R. D. H., Mendez, J. and Brown, S. A. (1982)The Natural Coumarins. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.Google Scholar
  17. Nitao, J. K. and Zangerl, A. R. (1987) Floral development and chemical defense allocation in wild parsnip.Ecology 68, 521–9.Google Scholar
  18. Price, P. W., Bouton, C. E., Gross, P., McPheron, B. A., Thompson, J. N. and Weis, A. E. (1980) Interactions among three trophic levels: influence of plants on interactions between insect herbivores and natural enemies.Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 11, 41–65.Google Scholar
  19. Riley, C. V. (1888) The parsnip webworm.Insect Life 1, 94–8.Google Scholar
  20. Stephenson, A. G. (1981) Flower and fruit abortion: proximate causes and ultimate functions.Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 12, 253–79.Google Scholar
  21. Stephenson, A. G. and Bertin, R. I. (1983) Male competition, female choice, and sexual selection in plants. InPollination Biology (L. Real, ed.) pp. 110–49. Academic Press, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  22. Sturtevant, E. L. (1890) Seedless fruits.Mem. Torr. Bot. Club 1, 141–85.Google Scholar
  23. Thompson, J. N. (1977) Plant plasticity, phenology, and herbivore dispersion: wild parsnip and the parsnip webworm.Ecology 58, 1112–19.Google Scholar
  24. Willson, M. F. and Burley, N. (1983)Mate Choice in Plants. Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA.Google Scholar
  25. Zangerl, A. R. and Berenbaum, M.R. (1990) Furanocoumarin induction in wild parsnip: Genetic and populational variation.Ecology (in press).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman and Hall Ltd. 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arthur R. Zangerl
    • 1
  • May R. Berenbaum
    • 1
  • James K. Nitao
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of EntomologyUniversity of IllinoisUrbana
  2. 2.Department of EntomologyMichigan State UniversityEast Lansing

Personalised recommendations