Chromatographia

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 285–296 | Cite as

Exponentially Modified Gaussian functions—A good model for chromatographic peaks in isocratic HPLC?

  • Pamela J. Naish
  • S. Hartwell
Article

Summary

The Exponentially Modified Gaussian (EMG) function is fitted to a variety of typical peaks from isocratic HPLC, to assess its validity for peak characterization. This model has previously been applied, but with simplifying assumptions, allowing estimation of peak parameters from simple “front and rear” half-width measurements. The full EMG function is employed in this work. The results of the simplified approach have been compared to the EMG fitted results. Comparison is also made to fitted Gaussian functions. Results show that the EMG function is a good model for typical LC peaks, under a range of conditions, and that the simplified approaches give close correlation for a range of peak assymetries.

Key Words

Peak shapes in chromatography Exponentially modified gaussian functions Peak dispersion Peak modelling 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    P. J. Naish, R. J. Dolphin, C. V. Perkins, Chromatographia,20, 335 (1985).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    J. J. Kirkland, W. W. Yau, H. J. Stoklosa, C. H. Dilks, J. Chromatogr. Sci.,15, 303 (1977).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    D. J. Anderson, R. R. Walters, J. Chrom. Sci.,22, 353 (1984).Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    C. E. Evans, V. L. McGuffin, Anal. Chem.,60, 573 (1988).Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    E. Grushka, Anal. Chem.,44, 1733 (1972).Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    J. C. Giddings, “Dynamics in Chromatography”, Part 1, Chromatog. Science Series, Vol. 1, Dekker, 1965.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    J. C. Sternberg, Adv. Chromatogr., 1966,2, 205–270.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    L. R. Snyder, J. J. Kirkland, “Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography”, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1979.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    W. M. A. Niessen, H. P. M. van Vliet, H. Poppe, Chromatographia,20, 357 (1985).Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    A. L. Colmsjo, M. W. Ericsson, J. Chromatogr.,398, 63 (1987).Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    W. W. Yau, Anal. Chem.,49, 395 (1977).Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    W. E. Barber, P. W. Carr, Anal. Chem.,53, 1939 (1981).Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    J. P. Foley, J. G. Dorsey, Anal. Chem.,55, 730 (1983).Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    J. P. Foley, J. G. Dorsey, J. Chromatog. Sci.,22, 40 (1984).Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    R. E. Pauls, L. B. Rogers, Anal. Chem.,49, 625 (1977).Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    J. P. Foley, Anal. Chem.,59, 1984 (1987).Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    S. N. Chesler, S. P. Cram, Anal. Chem.,45, 1354 (1973).Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    A. H. Anderson, T. C. Gibb, A. B. Littlewood, J. Chromatogr. Sci.,8, 640 (1970).Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    H. M. Gladney, B. F. Dowden, J. D. Swalen, Anal. Chem.,41, 883 (1969).Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    D. Hanggi, P. W. Carr, Anal. Chem.,57, 2394 (1985).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn Verlagsgesellschaft mbH 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pamela J. Naish
    • 1
  • S. Hartwell
    • 1
  1. 1.Philips ScientificCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations