Advertisement

Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Parental monetary investments in children: A focus on China

  • 154 Accesses

  • 8 Citations

Abstract

In 1979, China began the one child per couple policy throughout the country. In spite of the controversial issues of voluntary participation, the one-child policy has substantially reduced Chinese population growth. How might the policy affect parents' investiment in their children? This article attempts to study paretns' monetary investment in their children in four provinces of China using two-stage least squares procedure based on a survey of 4,000 Chinese children collected in 1990. This study shows that (a) the more children there are in a family, the less the parents invest in each of them; (b) parents seem to treat boys and girls differently; (c) although parents in rural areas invest less in absolute yuan terms, they invest a larger share of their income in their children than do their urban counterparts; (d) the presence of grandparent(s) seems to increase parents' monetary investment in their children; and (e) sibling structure is an important determinant in parents' investment decisions. Last, but not least, it is necessary to use different measures of parents' monetary investment to reveal a more complete and less biased picture of parental investment in children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Banster, J. (1987).China's changing population. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  2. Bauer, J., Wang, F., Riley, N., & Zhao, X. (1992). Gender inequality in urban China—education and employment.Modern China, 18, 333–370.

  3. Becker, G. S., & Lewis, H. G. (1973). On the interaction between the quantity and quality of children.Journal of Political Economy, 81 (2, part 2), S279-S288.

  4. Bian, J. (1994).Parental human capital investments in China: A policy evaluation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.

  5. China Population Census Office. (1991).Tabulation on the 1990 population census of the People's Republic of China. Beijing: China Statistics Press.

  6. Cooney, R. S., & Li, J. (1994). Household registration type and compliance with the “one child” policy in China, 1979–1988.Demography, 31, 21–32.

  7. Easterlin, R. A., Pollack, R. A., & Wachter, M. L. (1980). Toward a more general economic model of fertility determination: Endogenous preferences and natural fertility. InPopulation and economic changes in developing countries. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  8. Ermisch, J. F. (1989). Purchased child care, optimal family size and mother's employment: Theory and econometric analysis.Journal of Population Economics, 2, 79–102.

  9. Espenshade, T. J., Kameske, G., & Turchi, B. A. (1983). Family size and economic welfare.Family Planning Perspectives, 15, 289–294.

  10. Fraklin, M. A. (1989).The China sex-gender system, party policy, and the education of women (Working Paper no. 176). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, Office of Women in International Development.

  11. Greenhalgh, S. (1986). Shifts in China's population policy.Population and Development Review, 12, 491–515.

  12. Hardee-Cleaveland, K.A., & Banister, J. (1988). Fertility policy and impleentation in China, 1986–1988.Population and Development Review, 14, 245–286.

  13. Holmlund, B. (1984). Fertility and opportunity of children: Evidence on quantity-quality interaction in Sweden. InStockholm Research Reports in Demography, No. 24. Stockholm: University of Stockholm.

  14. Liu, P. K. C. (1984) The role of education in fertility transition in Taiwan.Economic Review (July–August), 1–28.

  15. Loscocco, K., & Wang, X. (1992). Gender segregation in China.Sociology and Social Research, 76, (3), 118–126.

  16. Min, K. F. (1990). Employment and access to on-the-job training of Chinese women.Verhandelingen, No. 47. The Hague: Centre for the Study of Education in Developing Countries.

  17. Moffitt, R. (1984). The estimation of fertility equations on panel data.Journal of Human Resources, 19, 22–34.

  18. Namboodiri, N. (1972). Some observations on the economic framework for fertility analysis.Population Studies, 26, 185–206.

  19. Ohbuchi, H. (1988). The quantity and quality of children, labor supply and wages of married women in postwar Japan.Journal of Population Studies, 11, 5–14.

  20. Rosenzweig, M. R., & Wolpin, K. (1980). Testing the quantity-quality fertility model: The use of twins as a natural experiment.Econometrica, 48, 227–240.

  21. State Statistical Bureau of China. (1991).China statistical yearbook, 1991. Beijing: China Statistical Information and Consultancy Service Center.

  22. Vijverberg, W. P. (1981).Labor supply and fertility decisions. University Microfilm International, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

  23. Willis, R. J. (1974). Economic theory of fertility behavior. In T. W. Schultz (Ed.),Economics of the family: Marriage, children, and human capital (pp. 25–75). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  24. Zhan, J. (1992).China family planning yearbook. Beijing: China Family Planning Yearbook Press.

Download references

Author information

Additional information

Her recent research interests include human capital investments, labor economics, self-employment, and family businesses. She received her Ph.D. in consumer and family economics from Cornell University. She also holds two master's degrees in economics from Pennsylvania State University and Nankai University in China.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bian, J. Parental monetary investments in children: A focus on China. J Fam Econ Iss 17, 113–139 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02265033

Download citation

Key Words

  • human capital investiments
  • one-child policy
  • parental investments
  • quantity and quality of children