Advertisement

Journal of Primary Prevention

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 75–97 | Cite as

The psychological origins of the white male patriarchy

  • George W. Albee
Articles

Abstract

A white male patriarchy developed in England as the British empire grew, expanding its colonial exploitation around the world. A rational explanation was required to explain how a small number of men deserved to control this enormous and growing wealth. With Darwin's theory of evolution (survival of the fittest), Galton's studies of genius (rich and successful men were related to each other) and Spencer's insight that natural selection in human societies was Nature's way of getting rid of bad stock and preserving the best, the theory took shape. The theory was imported to America where it flourishes. Psychologists provided evidence to support the ideas of the ruling class: intelligence, mental disorders, crime and the addictions are all due to bad genes and bad brains. The defect model occupies the center of the stage. There is no need to act to remove injustice, sexism, racism, homophobia—the causes of distress are not social, they are internal, personal defects. Drugs will reduce the symptoms while the search goes on for the internal defects.

Key words

Social Darwinism patriarchy class bias prejudice 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Addams, J. (1902).Democracy and social ethics. NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  2. Albee, G. W. (1982). The politics of nature and nurture.American Journal of Community Psychology, 10, 1, 1–36.Google Scholar
  3. Baltzell, E. D. (1964).The protestant establishment: Aristocracy and caste in America. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  4. Blum, J. M. (1978).Pseudoscience and mental ability. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brigham, C. C. (1923).A study of American intelligence. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Brigham, C. C. (1930). Intelligence tests of immigrant groups.Psychological Review, 165.Google Scholar
  7. Burt, C. (1966). The genetic determination of differences in intelligence: A study of monozygotic twins reared together and apart.British Journal of Psychology, 57, 137–153.Google Scholar
  8. Burt, C. (1972). Inheritance of general intelligence.American Psychologist, 27, 175–190.Google Scholar
  9. Darwin, C. (1859).The origin of species and the descent of man. London: Murray.Google Scholar
  10. Darwin, C. (1860). The preservation of favored races in the struggle for life. New York: D. Appleton.Google Scholar
  11. Davenport, C. B. (1911).Heredity in relation to eugenics. New York: H. Holt and Co.Google Scholar
  12. Deutsch, A. (1949). The mentally ill in America. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Eysenck, H. J. (1971).The IQ argument: Race intelligence and education. New York: The Library Press.Google Scholar
  14. Flynn, J. R. (1980). Race, IQ and Jensen. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  15. Forgays, D. (Ed.) (1978).Primary Prevention of Psychopathology: Environmental Influences. Hanover, N.H.: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
  16. Galton, F. (1869/1914).Hereditary genius: An inquiry into its laws and consequences. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  17. Galton, F. (1889).Natural inheritance. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  18. Garrett, H. E. (undated pamphlet, a.).Desegregation: fact and hokum. Richmond, VA., Patrick Henry Press.Google Scholar
  19. Garrett, H. E. (undated pamphlet, b.). Race, a reply to Race and intelligence: a scientific evaluation by the Anti-Defamation League of Bnai B'rith. Washington, D.C.: National Putnam Letters Committee.Google Scholar
  20. Grant, M. (1919).The passing of the great race, (revised edition). New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
  21. Hall, G. S. (1907). Youth: its education, regimen, and hygiene. New York: D. Appleton and Co.Google Scholar
  22. Hall, G. S. (1923). Life and confessions of a psychologist. New York: D. Appleton and Co.Google Scholar
  23. Hearnshaw, L. (1979).Cyril Burt, Psychologist. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. Vintage Books Edition, 1981.Google Scholar
  24. Heber, F. R. (1978). Sociocultural retardation: A longitudinal study. In D.G. Forgays, (Ed.)Environmental influences and strategies in primary prevention. Hanover, N. H.: The University Press of New England.Google Scholar
  25. Herrnstein, R. J. (1973).I.Q. in the meritocracy. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  26. Herrnstein, R. J. (1982). I.Q. testing and the media.The Atlantic Monthly, 249–50, pp. 68–74.Google Scholar
  27. Herrnstein, R. J. and Murray, C. A. (1994).The bell curve: intelligence and class structure in American life. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  28. Jarvis, E. (1855/1971).Idiocy and Lunacy in Massachusetts: Report of the Commission on Lunacy, 1855. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Originally published by Wm. White, Boston, 1855.)Google Scholar
  29. Kamin, L. (1973). Heredity, intelligence, politics and psychology. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  30. Kamin, L. (1974).The science and politics of I.Q. Potomac, MD: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. (Distributed by Halstead Press Division of John Wiley and Sons, Inc.)Google Scholar
  31. Locke, J. (1806).An essay concerning human understanding. 2nd American edition. Boston, MA: Thomas and Andrews.Google Scholar
  32. Lombroso, C. (1912).Crime: its causes and remedies. Montclair, N.J.: Montclair. (Originally published 1876).Google Scholar
  33. Malthus, T. R. (1826).Essay on the principle of population. London: J. Murray.Google Scholar
  34. Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1859/1936). The manifesto of the communist party. Section II. In Karl Marx,Selected works (Vol. 1). New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
  35. McDougall, W. (1921)An introduction to social psychology, 14th Edition. Boston: J. W. Luce & Co.Google Scholar
  36. McDougall, W. (1929).Modern materialism and emergent evolution. New York: D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc.Google Scholar
  37. Pastore, N. (1949).The nature-nurture controversy. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Pearson, K. (1904). On the laws of inheritance in man.Biometrica, 3, 131–190.Google Scholar
  39. Pearson, K. (1925). Problem of alien immigration into Great Britain illustrated by an examination of Russian and Polish Jewish children.Annals of Eugenics, 1, 5–127.Google Scholar
  40. Scarr, S. (1975). From evolution to Larry P., or what shall we do about IQ tests?Intelligence, 2, 325–342.Google Scholar
  41. Scarr, S. & Weinberg, R. A. (1976). IQ test performance of black children adopted by white families.American Psychologist, 31, 726–739.Google Scholar
  42. Scarr, S., Pakstis, A. J., Katz, S. H., & Barker, W. B. (1977). The absence of a relationship between degree of white ancestry and intellectual skills within a black population.Human Genetics, 39, 69–86.Google Scholar
  43. Scarr, S. (1978). From evolution to Larry P., or what shall we do about I.Q. tests?Intelligence, 2, 325–342.Google Scholar
  44. Scarr, S. (1981).Race, social class, and individual differences in IQ. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  45. Schweinhart, L. J. & Weikart, D. P. (1988). The High/Scope Perry Preschool program. In R. H. Price, E. L. Cowen, R. P. Lorian, & J. Ramos-McKay (Eds.)14 ounces of prevention: A casebook for practitioners, (pp. 9–23). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  46. Schwendinger, H. & Schwendinger, J. (1974).The sociologists of the chair. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  47. Spencer, H. (1872).On social evolution; selected writings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  48. Spencer, H. (1894).A plea for liberty: an argument against socialism and socialist legislation. Introductory lecture. London: J. Murray.Google Scholar
  49. Spencer, H. (1897).Principles of psychology. New York: D. Appleton.Google Scholar
  50. Thomas, M. C. (1979).The making of a feminist: early journals and letters of M. Carey Thomas. Kent, Ohio: Kent State University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • George W. Albee
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.University of VermontUSA
  2. 2.Florida Mental Health InstituteUniversity of South FloridaUSA

Personalised recommendations