Community-based perinatal care for disadvantaged adolescents: Evaluation of the resource mothers program
- 79 Downloads
This study compared the effects of a community-based lay home visiting initiative for pregnant adolescents, the Norfolk Resource Mothers Program, with the effects of a more traditional clinic-based program. The Resource Mothers Program (RMP) supports disadvantaged teens through the use of para-professional home visitors who are similar to the teens in race and socio-economic status. In addition to recruiting teens into the program and encouraging early prenatal care, the Resource Mothers Program provides teen mothers and their families with practical help and increases community awareness regarding infant mortality and adolescent pregnancy. When compared with a traditional clinic-based multi-disciplinary program (MDP) using health professionals, the Resource Mothers Program reached a higher percentage of high-risk adolescents (e.g., 75.5% RMP vs. 45.6% MDP clients aged 17 years old or under), promoted a higher level of prenatal care (e.g., 53.1% RMP vs. 32.6% MDP clients beginning prenatal care before the fourth month of pregnancy), and resulted in pregnancy outcomes that favored the MDP but were comparable (e.g., 89.8% RMP vs. 93.5% MDP client babies were over 2500 grams at birth).
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.National Center for Health Statistics:Health, United States, 1991. Hyattsville, MD: Public Health Service: 149, 1992.Google Scholar
- 2.National Center for Health Statistics:Health, United States, 1990. Hyattsville, MD: Public Health Service: 68, 1991.Google Scholar
- 6.General Accounting Office.Home Visiting — A Promising Early Intervention Strategy for at-Risk Families. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office: 59–61, 1990.Google Scholar
- 7.Grantham-McGregor, S, Schofield, W, and Powell, C: Development of severely malnourished children who received psychosocial stimulation: Six year follow-up.Ped 79: 376–391, 1987.Google Scholar
- 8.Seitz, V, Rosenbaum, LK, Apfel, NH: Effects of family support intervention: A ten-year follow-up.Child Dev 56: 247–254, 1985.Google Scholar
- 9.Buescher, PA, Meis, PJ, Ernst, JM, Moore, ML, Michielutte, R, Sharp, P: A comparison of women in and out of a prematurity prevention project in a North Carolina perinatal care region.Am J Public Health 78: 264–267, 1985.Google Scholar
- 11.Musick, JS, Bernstein, V, Percansky, C, Stott, FM: A chain of enablement: using community-based programs to strengthen relationships between teen parents and their infants.Zero to Three 8: 1–6, 1987.Google Scholar
- 13.Center of Health Statistics:Virginia Vital Statistics, 1990 Annual Report. Richmond, VA: Virginia Department of Health: 16–18, 1991.Google Scholar