A comparison of health status between rural and urban adults
- 292 Downloads
The objective of the study was to examine and compare health status between rural and urban adults. The data are from a 1993 statewide probability-based telephone survey of adult Kentuckians (n=662). Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) residents (n=264) and nonMSA residents (n=398) were compared using the Medical Outcomes Study, Short Form Health Survey (SF-20). Self-perceived urban (n=406) and rural (n=256) residents were also compared. Additional analyses were stratified by the age categories of 18–44, 45–64, and ≥65 years of age. Few differences in health status existed between rural and urban adults. However, rural elders (≥65 years) had significantly poorer health status than urban elders. After controlling for demographic variables in multiple regressions, rural elders had significantly poorer functioning (all p<.05) than urban elders as measured by the SF-20 subscales of a) physical functioning, b) role functioning, c) social functioning, d) general mental health, and e) general health perceptions. No differences between rural and urban residents were noted for the pain subscale. Although the health status of rural and urban adults is generally similar, the rural elderly have significantly worse health status than their urban counterparts.
KeywordsHealth Status Urban Resident Health Perception Medical Outcome Study Form Health
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Office of Program Development.Study of Models to Meet Rural Health Care Needs. Rockville, MD: Health Resources and Service Administration, 1992. Publication No. HRS 240-89-0037.Google Scholar
- 2.Kletke PR, Marder WD, Willke RJ. A projection of the primary care physician population in metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas.Primary Care Research: Theory and Methods. AHCPR conference proceedings, Washington DC: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; 1991:261–269.Google Scholar
- 3.Van Nostrand JF, ed. Common beliefs about the rural elderly: what do national data tell us?Vital Health Stat 3; 1993.Google Scholar
- 4.Feldstein PJ.Health Care Economics. Third Edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1988:76–109.Google Scholar
- 7.Norton CH, McManus MA. Background tables on demographic characteristics, health status, and health services utilization.Health Serv Res. 1989;23:725–755.Google Scholar
- 10.Data Watch. Study: rural elders living alone at greater risk for health problems.Hosp Health Netw. 1993 Sep 20:67:58.Google Scholar
- 11.Waksberg J. Sampling methods for random digit dialing.J Am Stat Assoc. 1978;73:40–6.Google Scholar
- 12.Sudman S. Applied sampling. In: Rossi PH, Wright JD, Anderson AB, eds.Handbook of Survey Research. New York: Academic Press; 1983:145–94.Google Scholar
- 13.Rosenblatt RA. Summary and reactions: rural health manpower research.Primary Care Research: Theory and Methods. AHCPR conference proceedings, Washington DC: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; 1991:271–275.Google Scholar
- 16.Ware JE. How to score the SF-20.Memorandum released to users of the Medical Outcomes Study 20-Item Short-Form Health Survey. Boston, MA: New England Medical Center, 1990.Google Scholar