Advertisement

Hydrobiological Bulletin

, Volume 15, Issue 1–2, pp 87–91 | Cite as

Habitat differentiation and feeding strategies in water mites in Lake Maarsseveen I

  • C. Davids
  • C. F. Heijnis
  • J. E. Weekenstroo
Article

Summary

The habitat preference as regards depth and vegetation areas is discussed for a number ofPiona species.P. conglobata mainly walks over the water plants and undertakes swimming excursions of short duration from there.Arrenurus crassicaudatus is a bottom dweller.

This behaviour is related to the searching activities for preys. The main food ofA. crassicaudatus consists of ostracods.P. conglobata prefersDaphnia aboveCyclops, while forUnionicola crassipes the reverse holds true.P. conglobata andU. crassipes do not recognize ostracods as possible preys. The relative prey size greatly influences the rate of catching success.

The feeding strategies (catching behaviour, prey preferences and handling time) of these three species are discussed. Differences in these strategies are also considered in view of species diversity.

Keywords

Short Duration Species Diversity Water Plant Habitat Preference Habitat Differentiation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ANGELIER, C., 1953. Etude de la faune hydracarienne du Lac de Saint-André (Savoie). Ann.Stat. Centr. Hydrobiol. appliquée. Fasc. hors série: 199–240.Google Scholar
  2. DAVIDS, C., 1979. The water mites of the Netherlands. Life history and occurrence. Wet. Med. K.N.N.V., Nr. 132:1–78 (in Dutch).Google Scholar
  3. DAVIDS, C., Ch. DE GROOT and A.MOL, 1980. The Water Mite Fauna of Lake Maarsseveen I. In: Limnological research in the Maarsseveen lakes, 1975–1980. p. 259–268. Ed. J. Ringelberg. Dept. Aquatic Ecology, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  4. DAVIDS, C., E.F.BEINTEMA, R.MULDER and J.E.WEEKENSTROO. Feeding rate and egg production in water mites in relationship with temperature. Verh.Internat. Verein. Limnol., 21 (in press).Google Scholar
  5. KERSTING, KEES, 1981. Annual and diel oxygen and temperature regime of the lakes Maarsseveen. Hydrobiol. Bull., 15: 10–28.Google Scholar
  6. KOWALIK, W., 1977. Occurrence and distribution of water mites (Hydracarina) in the near-bottom zone of Piaseczno Lake. Ann. Univ.Mariae Curie-Sklodowska Section C, 32:323–344 (in Polish).Google Scholar
  7. McARTHUR, R.H., 1958. Population ecology of some warblers of northeastern coniferous forests. Ecology, 39:599–619.Google Scholar
  8. VIETS, K., 1924. Die Hydracarinen der norddeutschen, besonders der holsteinischen Seen. Arch. Hydrobiol., Suppl., 4:71–179.Google Scholar
  9. VIETS, K.O., 1979. Wassermilben (Hydrachnellae, Acari) aus dem Litoral des Bodensees. Arch. Hydrobiol., 87:84–94.Google Scholar
  10. ZARET, Th.M., 1978. A predation model of zooplankton community structure. Verh.Internat. Verein. Limnol., 20:2496–2500.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Netherlands Hydrobiological Society 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Davids
    • 1
  • C. F. Heijnis
    • 1
  • J. E. Weekenstroo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Aquatic EcologyUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations