Rule-governed behavior and pedophilia

  • Joseph J. Plaud
  • Donald E. Newberry
Theoretical Article

Abstract

The experimental analysis of verbal and rule-governed behavior is one area that potentially has much relevance to applied clinical settings, including the assessment and treatment of pedophilia. Much of the interaction between therapists and clients takes place in a verbal context. Since the publication of Skinner'sVerbal Behavior in 1957, however, not much systematic clinical research concerning verbal behavior has been integrated into clinical practice, partly evidenced in the past several years by the many cognitive theories proclaiming to some extent that “mental way stations” explain the causes of behavior. This paper analyzes the fundamental aspects of rule-governed behavior, summarizes current research in this area, and explores some of the research methods and issues involved with rule-governed behavior. In addition, the potential of this area of behavioral psychology to provide important alternatives to explanations offered by cognitive psychology is also explored. Implications for the scientific use of rule-governed behavior in conducting psychological assessments with pedophiles is also examined.

Key Words

rule-governed behavior contingency-shaped behavior behavior analysis behavior therapy pedophilia sexual offending cognitive psychology 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Buskist, W. F., & Miller, H. L. (1986). Interaction between rules and contingencies in the control of human fixed-interval performances.The Psychological Record, 36, 109–116.Google Scholar
  2. Blumberg, M. S., & Wasserman, E. A. (1995). Animal mind and the argument from animal design.American Psychologist, 50(3), 133–144.Google Scholar
  3. Cerutti, D. T. (1989). Discrimination theory of rule-governed behavior.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 259–276.Google Scholar
  4. Chomsky, N. (1957).Syntactic structures. LaHaye: Mouton.Google Scholar
  5. Chomsky, N. (1959). Review of Skinner, B. F., Verbal behavior.Language, 4, 16–49.Google Scholar
  6. Dougher, M. J. (1988). Clinical assessment of sex offenders.A practitioner's guide to treating the incarcerated male sex offender. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  7. Galazio, M. (1979). Contingency-shaped and rule-governed behavior: Instructional control of human loss avoidance.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 31, 53–70.Google Scholar
  8. Galazio, M. (1987). Interpretation versus experimentation in the experimental analysis of human behavior.The Psychological Record, 37(1), 11–15.Google Scholar
  9. Hanna, P., Hanna J., Hodges, R., & Rodorf, E. (1966).Phoneme-grapheme correspondences as cues to spelling improvement. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  10. Hayes, S. C. (1987). A contextual approach to therapeutic behavior change. In N. Jacobson (Ed.),Psychotherapists in clinical practice: Cognitive and behavioral approaches. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  11. Hayes, S. C. (1994). Content, context, and the types of psychological acceptance. In S. C. Hayes, N. S. Jacobson, V. M. Follette, & M. J. Dougher (Eds.),Acceptance and change: Content and context in psychotherapy (pp. 13–32). Reno, NV: Context Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hayes, S. C., Jacobson, N. S., Follette, V. M., & Dougher, M. J. (Eds.) (1994).Acceptance and change: Content and context in psychotherapy, Reno, NV: Context Press.Google Scholar
  13. Horne, P. J., & Lowe, C. F. (1993). Determinants of human performance on concurrent schedules.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 29–60.Google Scholar
  14. Joyce, B. G., Joyce, J. H., & Chase, P. N. (1989). Considerations for the use of rules in academic settings.Education and Treatment of Children, 12(1), 82–92.Google Scholar
  15. Joyce, J. H., & Chase, P. N. (1990). Effects of response variability on the sensitivity of rule-governed behavior.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 54, 251–262.Google Scholar
  16. Koerner, K. (1994). The overt-covert link. In S. C. Hayes, N. S. Jacobson, V. M. Follette, & M. J. Dougher (Eds.),Acceptance and change: Content and context in psychotherapy (pp. 171–173). Reno NV: Context Press.Google Scholar
  17. LoPiccolo, J. (1994). Acceptance and broad spectrum treatment of paraphilias. In S. C. Hayes, N. S. Jacobson, V. M. Follette, & M. J. Dougher (Eds.),Acceptance and change: Content and context in psychotherapy (pp. 149–170), Reno, NV: Context Press.Google Scholar
  18. Pierce, W. D., & Epling, W. F. (1995).Behavior analysis and learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  19. Plaud, J. J. (1992). The prediction and control of behavior revisited: A review of the matching law.Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 23, 25–31.Google Scholar
  20. Plaud, J. J. (1995). The formation of stimulus equivalences: Fear-relevant versus fear-irrelevant stimulus classes.The Psychological Record, 45, 207–222.Google Scholar
  21. Plaud, J. J., & Vogeltanz, N. (1991). Behavior therapy: Lost ties to animal research?The Behavior Therapist, 14, 89–93, 115.Google Scholar
  22. Plaud, J. J., & Vogeltanz, N. D. (1993). Behavior therapy and the experimental analysis of behavior: Contributions to the science of human behavior and radical behavioral philosophy.Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 24, 119–127.Google Scholar
  23. Pouthas, V., Droit, A., Jaquet, Y., & Wearden, J. H. (1990). Temporal differentiation of response duration in children of different ages: Developmental changes in relations between verbal and nonverbal behavior.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 53, 21–31.Google Scholar
  24. Richelle M. N. (1993).B. F. Skinner: A reappraisal. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  25. Skinner, B. F. (1957).Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  26. Skinner, B. F. (1969).Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  27. Skinner, B. F. (1986). The evolution of verbal behavior.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45, 115–122.Google Scholar
  28. Svartdahl, F. (1991). Operant modulation of low-level attributes of rule-governed behavior by nonverbal contingencies.Learning and Motivation, 22, 406–420.Google Scholar
  29. Ward, T., Hudson, S. M., & Marshall, W. L. (1995). Cognitive distortions and affective deficits in sex offenders: A cognitive deconstructionist interpretation.Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 7, 67–83.Google Scholar
  30. Zettle R. D. (1990). Rule-governed behavior: A radical behavioral answer to the cognitive challenge.The Psychological Record, 40, 41–49.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph J. Plaud
    • 1
  • Donald E. Newberry
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of North DakotaGrand Forks

Personalised recommendations