Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 185, Issue 1, pp 151–162 | Cite as

Soil structure and plant growth: Impact of bulk density and biopores

  • R. J. Stirzaker
  • J. B. Passioura
  • Y. Wilms
Regular Research Articles

Abstract

Compacted soils are not uniformly hard; they usually contain structural cracks and biopores, the continuous large pores that are formed by soil fauna and by roots of previous crops. Roots growing in compacted soils can traverse otherwise impenetrable soil by using biopores and cracks and thus gain access to a larger reservoir of water and nutrients. Experiments were conducted in a growth chamber to determine the plant response to a range of uniform soil densities, and the effect of artificial and naturally-formed biopores. Barley plants grew best at an intermediate bulk density, which presumably represented a compromise between soil which was soft enough to allow good root development but sufficiently compact to give good root-soil contact. Artificial 3.2 mm diameter biopores made in hard soil gave roots access to the full depth of the pot and were occupied by roots more frequently than expected by chance alone. This resulted in increased plant growth in experiments where the soil was allowed to dry. Our experiments suggest that large biopores were not a favourable environment for roots in wet soil; barley plants grew better in pots containing a network of narrow biopores made by lucerne and ryegrass roots, responded positively to biopores being filled with peat, and some pea radicles died in biopores. A theoretical analysis of water uptake gave little support to the hypothesis that water supply to the leaves was limiting in either very hard or very soft soil. The net effect of biopores to the plant would be the benefits of securing extra water and nutrients from depth, offset by problems related to poor root-soil contact in the biopore and impeded laterals in the compacted biopore walls.

Key words

biopores compaction root growth root-soil contact root signals 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abdalla A M, Hettiaratchi D R P and Reece A R 1969 The mechanics of root growth in granular media. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 14, 263–248.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander K G and Miller M H 1991 The effect of aggregate size on early growth and shoot-root ratio of maize (Zea mays L.). Plant and Soil 138, 189–194.Google Scholar
  3. Avidsson J and Håkansson I 1991 A model for estimating crop yield losses caused by soil compaction. Soil Tillage Res. 20, 319–332.Google Scholar
  4. Bengough A G and Mullins C E 1990 Mechanical impedance to root growth: a review of experimental techniques and root growth responses. J. Soil Sci. 41, 341–358.Google Scholar
  5. Blaikie S J and Mason W K 1993 Restrictions to root growth limit the yield of shoots of irrigated white clover. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 44, 121–135.Google Scholar
  6. Boone F R 1986 Towards soil compaction limits for crop growth. Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 34, 349–60.Google Scholar
  7. Chan K Y, Mead J A, Roberts W P and Wong P T W 1989 The effect of soil compaction and fumigation on poor early growth of wheat under direct drilling. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 42, 221–228.Google Scholar
  8. Cresswell H P and Kirkegaard J A 1995 Subsoil amelioration by plant roots: the process and the evidence. Aust. J. Soil Res. 32, 221–239.Google Scholar
  9. Cornish P S, So H B and McWilliam J R 1984 Effects of soil bulk density and water regimen on root growth and uptake of phosphorus by ryegrass. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 35, 631–644.Google Scholar
  10. Davies W J and Zhang J 1991 Root signals and the regulation of growth and development of plants in drying soil. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Molec. Biol. 42, 55–76.Google Scholar
  11. Dexter A R 1986 Model experiments on the behaviour of roots at the interface between a tilled seed-bed and a compacted sub-soil. III. Entry of pea and wheat roots into cylindrical biopores. Plant and Soil 95, 149–161.Google Scholar
  12. Donald R G, Kay B D and Miller M H 1987 The effect of soil aggregate size on early shoot and root growth of maize (Zea mays L.) Plant and Soil 103, 251–259.Google Scholar
  13. Edwards C A and Lofty J R 1978 The influence of arthropods and earthworms upon root growth of direct drilled crops. J. Appl. Ecol. 15, 789–795.Google Scholar
  14. Ehlers W, Köpke U, Hesse F and Böhm W 1983 Penetration resistance and root growth of of oats in tilled and untilled loess soil. Soil Tillage Res. 3, 261–275.Google Scholar
  15. Evans D G and Miller M H 1988 Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizas and the soil-disturbance-induced reduction of nutrient absorption in maize. 1. Causal relations. New Phytol. 110, 67–74.Google Scholar
  16. Herkelrath W N, Miller E E and Gardner W R 1977 Water uptake by plants. The root contact model. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 41, 1039–1043.Google Scholar
  17. Hulugalle N R and Lal R 1986 Root growth of maize in a compacted gravelly tropical alfisol as affected by rotation with a woody perennial. Field Crops Res. 13, 33–44.Google Scholar
  18. Jakobsen B F and Dexter A R 1988 Influence of biopores on root growth, water uptake and grain yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum) based on predictions from a computer model. Biol. Fertil. Soils 6, 315–321.Google Scholar
  19. Körner Ch, Susanna Pelaez Menendez-Riedl and John P C L 1989 Why are Bonsai plants small? A consideration of cell size. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 16, 443–447.Google Scholar
  20. Krizek D T, Carmi A, Mirecki R M, Snyder F W and Bunce J A 1984 Comparative effects of soil moisture stress and restricted root zone volume on morphogenetic and physiological responses of soybean. J. Exp. Bot. 36, 25–38.Google Scholar
  21. Kooistra M J, Schoonderbeek D, Boone F R, Veen B W and Van Noordwijk M 1992 Root-soil contact of maize, as measured by a thin-section technique. II. Effects of soil compaction. Plant and Soil 139, 119–129.Google Scholar
  22. Lee K E 1985 Earthworms: Their Ecology and Relationships with Soils and Land Use. Academic Press, Sydney, Australia. 411 p.Google Scholar
  23. Materechera S A, Alston A M, Kirby J M and Dexter A R 1992 Influence of root diameter on the penetration of seminal roots into a compacted subsoil. Plant and Soil 144, 297–303Google Scholar
  24. Masle J and Passioura J B 1987 The effect of soil strength on the growth of young wheat plants. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 14, 643–656.Google Scholar
  25. McKenzie B M and Dexter A R 1988 Radial pressures generated by the earthworm.Aporrectodea rosea. Biol. Fertil. Soils 5, 328–332.Google Scholar
  26. Nambiar E K S and Sands R 1992 Effects of compaction and simulated root channels in the subsoil on root development, water uptake and growth of radiata pine. Tree Physiol. 10, 297–306.Google Scholar
  27. Nye P H 1992 Towards the quantitative control of crop production and quality. III. Some recent developments in research into the root-soil interface. J. Plant Nutr. 15, 1175–1192.Google Scholar
  28. Nye P H 1994 The effect of root shrinkage on soil water inflow. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 345, 395–402.Google Scholar
  29. Passioura J B and Cowan I R 1968 On solving the non-linear diffusion equation for the radial flow of water to roots. Agric. Meteorol. 5, 129–134.Google Scholar
  30. Passioura J B 1980 The transport of water from soil to shoot in wheat seedlings. J. Exp. Bot. 31, 331–345.Google Scholar
  31. Passioura J B 1988 Water transport in and to roots. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 39, 245–265.Google Scholar
  32. Passioura J B 1991 Soil structure and plant growth. Aust. J. Soil Res. 29, 717–728.Google Scholar
  33. Passioura J B and Stirzaker R J 1994 Feedforward responses of plants to physically inhospitable soil.In International Crop Science I. Ed. D R Buxton. pp 715–719. Crop Science Society of America, Madison, WI, USA.Google Scholar
  34. Richards D and Rowe R N 1977 Effects of root restriction, root pruning and 6-benzylaminopurine on the growth of peach seedlings. Ann. Bot. 41, 729–740.Google Scholar
  35. Rose D A 1968 Water movement in porous materials. III. Evaporation of water from soil. Br. J. Appl. Phys. 1, 1779–1791.Google Scholar
  36. Stirzaker R J, Passioura J B, Sutton B G and Collis-George N 1993 Soil management for irrigated vegetable production. 2. Possible causes for slow vegetative growth of lettuce associated with zero-tillage. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 44, 831–844.Google Scholar
  37. Stirzaker R J and Passioura J B 1996 The water relations of the root-soil interface. Plant Cell Environ. 19, 201–208.Google Scholar
  38. Stirzaker R J and White I 1995 Amelioration of soil compaction by a cover-crop for no-tillage lettuce production. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 46, 553–568.Google Scholar
  39. Tardieu F, Bruckler L and Lafolie F 1992 Root clumping may affect the root water potential and the resistance to soil-root water transport. Plant and Soil 140, 291–301.Google Scholar
  40. Veen B W, Van Noordwijk M, De Willigen P, Boone F R and Kooistra M J 1992 Root-soil contact of maize, as measured by a thin-section technique. III. Effects on shoot growth, nitrate and water uptake efficiency. Plant and Soil 139, 131–138.Google Scholar
  41. Wang J, Hesketh J D and Woolley J T 1986 Preexisting channels and soybean rooting patterns. Soil Sci. 141, 432–437.Google Scholar
  42. Whiteley G M, Hewitt J S and Dexter A R 1982 The buckling of plant roots. Physiol. Plant. 54, 333–342.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. J. Stirzaker
    • 1
    • 2
  • J. B. Passioura
    • 1
  • Y. Wilms
    • 3
  1. 1.CSIRO Division of Plant IndustryAustralia
  2. 2.CSIRO Centre for Environmental MechanicsAustralia
  3. 3.LarensteinGB VelpThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations