Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

The solid waste dilemma

  • 37 Accesses

Abstract

In 1976, the U.S. Congress enacted the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) to further address the problem of increasing industrial and municipal waste. The main objectives of RCRA were to responsibly manage hazardous and solid waste and to procure materials made from recovered wastes. To fulfill these objectives, four main programs of waste management were developed. These programs were defined under Subtitle C, the Hazardous Waste Program; Subtitle D, the Solid Waste Program; Subtitle I, the Underground Storage Tank Program; and Subtitle J, the Medical Waste Program. Subtitle D illustrates the solid waste dilemma occurring in the United States. Under this program, states are encouraged to develop and implement their own waste management plans. These plans include the promotion of recycling solid wastes and the closing and upgrading of all environmentally unsound dumps.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Blumberg, L., and Gottlieb, R., 1989, War on waste: Island Press, p. 111.

  2. Glenn, J., 1992, The state of garbage in America: Biocycle, April, p. 46–55.

  3. More, A., 1990, Proposed Senate bill endangers interstate waste disposal patterns: Waste Age, October, p 36–37.

  4. National Solid Wastes Management Association, 1988, Special Report—Landfill capacity in the year 2000: 16 p.

  5. National Solid Wastes Management Association, 1990, Special Report—Recycling in the states: 1990 Review, 15 p.

  6. Thunder, C., and Ashley, D., 1990, Developing recycling markets and industries: National Conference of State Legislators, July, p. 13.

  7. U.S. Congress, 1970, National Materials Policy Act of 1970.

  8. U.S. Department of Energy, 1992, Annual energy review 1991: Energy Information Administration, DOE/EIA-0384(91), p. 209.

  9. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1988, Report to Congress: Solid waste disposal in the United States: Office of Solid Waste EPA/530 SW-088 011B, v. 11, Chap. 4.

  10. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1990, RCRA orientation manual, 1990 Ed: Office of Solid Waste, EPA/530 SW-90-036, p. 1–5.

  11. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1992, Characterization of municipal solid waste in the United States, 1992 update: Municipal and Industrial Solid Waste Division, Office of Solid Waste, EPA/530 R-92-019, 103 p.

  12. Waste Age, 1991, States increase recycling laws but shift focus from separation; September, p. 20.

  13. Waste Age, 1992, Energy from municipal waste: Picking up where recycling leaves off; November, p. 42.

  14. Winne, E., 1989, Mid-Atlantic: microcosm of U.S. in solid waste matter. Plastic Trends, v. 5, no. 4, p. 5–6.

Download references

Author information

Additional information

Correspondence should be directed to Earle B. Amey, U.S. Geological Survey, National Center 983, Reston, Virginia 20192.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Russell, J.A., Hurdelbrink, R.J. The solid waste dilemma. Nat Resour Res 5, 249–259 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02257438

Download citation

Key Words

  • Solid waste
  • waste management
  • recycling