The alignment of sets of sequences and the construction of phyletic trees: An integrated method
In this paper we argue that the alignment of sets of sequences and the construction of phyletic trees cannot be treated separately. The concept of ‘good alignment’ is meaningless without reference to a phyletic tree, and the construction of phyletic trees presupposes alignment of the sequences.
We propose an integrated method that generates both an alignment of a set of sequences and a phyletic tree. In this method a putative tree is used to align the sequences and the alignment obtained is used to adjust the tree; this process is iterated. As a demonstration we apply the method to the analysis of the evolution of 5S rRNA sequences in prokaryotes.
Key wordsSequence alignment Phyletic trees Matrix methods Internode sequences Homology assessment Tree representation Prokaryotic 5S rRNA evolution
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Chou FE, Fasman GD (1978) Prediction of secondary structure of proteins from their amino acid sequence. Adv Enzyol. 47:145–148Google Scholar
- Dayhoff MO (1976) Atlas of protein structure, vol 5, suppl 2. National Biochemical Research Foundation, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Fox GE, Woese CR (1975) 5S RNA secondary structure. Nature 256:505–507Google Scholar
- Hogeweg P (1976b) Topics in biological pattern analysis. Thesis, RU UtrechtGoogle Scholar
- Hogeweg P, Hesper B (1972) BIOPAT, program system for bioinformatic pattern analysis. Bioinformatica, UtrechtGoogle Scholar
- Hori H, Osawa S (1979) Evolutionary change in 5S RNA secondary structure and a phylogenetic tree of 54 5S RNA species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 16:381–385Google Scholar
- Leenhouts PW (1968) A guide to herbarium taxonomy. IAPT, Utrecht (Regnum vegetabile, vol 58)Google Scholar
- McNeill J (1978) Purposeful phenetics. Syst Zool 28:465–482Google Scholar
- Sneath HA, Sokal RR (1973) Numerical taxonomy. WH Freeman, San Francisco, LondonGoogle Scholar