Netherland Journal of Aquatic Ecology

, Volume 26, Issue 2–4, pp 431–440 | Cite as

Lipiniella arenicola (Chironomidae) compared withChironomus muratensis andCh. nudiventris: Distribution patterns related to depth and sediment characteristics, diet, and behavioural response to reduced oxygen concentrations

  • Henk Smit
  • Floor Heinis
  • Ronald Bijkerk
  • Frans Kerkum
Distribution

Abstract

Density patterns ofLipiniella arenicola andChironomus muratensis were studied in Lake Wolderwijd (The Netherlands) using geostatistics, and compared with patterns of depth and silt contents of the sediment.L. arenicola was restricted to shallow (depth <1 m), sandy silt (silt content <5%), wind-exposed sediments.Ch. muratensis occurred all over the lake, but the highest densities were found in the sheltered silty North-West corner. Gut analyses of IV-instar larvae from the Ventjagers flats (Haringvliet, Lower Rhine-Meuse) showed thatL. arenicola fed by selectively grazing on benthic algae,Ch. muratensis by filtering and non-selective grazing, andCh. nudiventris by non-selective grazing. In the laboratory, behavioural responses to reduced oxygen concentrations were tested with the impedance conversion technique.L. arenicola was more sensitive to low oxygen concentrations (<3 mg l−1) than bothChironomus species. It is argued that the differences in resistance to hypoxia and feeding behaviour are in accordance with the differences in distribution patterns. The restriction ofL. arenicola to the pure sand habitats is not attributable to an especially high sensitivity to low dissolved oxygen concentrations alone. Several behavioural adaptations enableL. arenicola larvae to live in the shallow, wind-exposed pure-sand habitats: the ability to select food items, tube strength, and site selection of ovipositing females or planktonic larvae.

Keywords

Lipiniella Chironomus depth distribution sediment characteristics geostatistics gut analysis oxygen behaviour impedance conversion 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ANONYMOUS, 1991. Oxygen-dependent behavioural patterns in midge larvae; a laboratory study on the larvae ofLipiniella arenicola, Chironomus muratensis andCh. nudiventris. Report 91.0089 of AquaSense Consultancy, Amsterdam [In Dutch with English summary].Google Scholar
  2. BURROUGH, P.A., W. VAN DEURSEN, V. JETTEN and J. VAN KEULEN, 1988. Geostatistics, landform analysis and raster processing. Dept. Phys. Geogr., Inst. Geogr. Res. Univ. Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  3. BIJKERK, R., 1993. Microphytobenthos as a food source for chironomid larvae in a freshwater tidal area, Ventijagers flats, Haringvliet. RDD Aquatic Ecosystems Rep. 93.25, RDD Aquatic Ecosystems, Haren. (In Dutch).Google Scholar
  4. DAVIS, J.C., 1986. Statistics and data analysis in Geology (second ed.). John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  5. DUDOK VAN HEEL, H.C., H. SMIT and S. WIERSMA, 1992. Densities, biomass and species composition of macrobenthos in the Lower Rhine (The Netherlands). Rijkswaterstaat, RIZA, Lelystad. Rep. 91.051. (in Dutch with English summary).Google Scholar
  6. HÅKANSON, L. and M. JANSSON, 1983. Principles of lake sedimentology. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  7. HARGRAVE, B.T., 1972. Aerobic decomposition of sediment and detritus as a function of particle surface area and organic content. Limnol. Oceanogr., 17: 583–596.Google Scholar
  8. HEINIS, F., 1991. The relation between oxygen regimes and distribution patterns of the larvae of Chironomidae. Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol., 24: 2924.Google Scholar
  9. HEINIS, F. and T. CROMMENTUIJN, (1992). Behaviourial responses to changing oxygen concentrations of deposit feeding chironomid larvae (Diptera) of littoral and profundal habitats. Arch. Hydrobiol., 124: 173–185.Google Scholar
  10. HEINIS, F. and W.R. SWAIN, 1986. Impedance conversion as a method of research for assessing behaviourial responses of aquatic invertebrates. Hydrobiol. Bull., 19: 183–192.Google Scholar
  11. JOHNSON, R.K., 1984. Distribution ofChironomus plumosus andCh. anthracinus with respect to sediment parameters in mesotrophic Lake Erken. Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol., 22: 750–758.Google Scholar
  12. JOHNSON, R.K., 1985. Feeding efficiencies ofChironomus plumosus (L.) andC. anthracinus Zett. (Diptera: Chironomidae) in mesotrophic Lake Erken. Freshwat. Biol., 15: 605–612.Google Scholar
  13. JOHNSON, R.K., 1986. Life histories and coexistence ofChironomus plumosus L. and C.anthracinus Zett. (Diptera: Chironomidae) andPonthoporeia affinis (Crustacea: Amphipoda) in mesotrophic Lake Erken. Acta Univ. Upps. Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala n. 37.Google Scholar
  14. JOHNSON, 1987. Seasonal variation in diet ofChironomus plumosus (L.) andC. anthracinus Zett. (Diptera: Chironomidae) in mesotrophic Lake Erken. Freshwat. Biol., 17: 525–532.Google Scholar
  15. JOHNSON, R.K. and B. PEJLER, 1987. Life histories and coexistence of the two profundalChironomus species in Lake Erken, Sweden. Ent. Scand. Suppl., 29: 233–238.Google Scholar
  16. JOHNSON, R.K., B. BOSTRÖM and W. VAN DE BUND, 1989. Interactions betweenChironomus plumosus (L.) and the microbial community in surficial sediments of a shallow, eutrophic lake. Limnol. Oceanogr., 34: 992–1003.Google Scholar
  17. KAJAK, Z., 1977. Factors influencing benthos biomass in shallow lake environments. Ekologia Polska, 25: 421–429.Google Scholar
  18. KALUGINA, N.S., 1970. A new species of the genusLipiniella (Diptera: Chironomidae). Zool. Zh., 49: 1034–1038.Google Scholar
  19. KIKNADZE, I., I. KERKIS, A. SHILOVA and M. FILIPPOVA, 1989. A review of the species of the genusLipiniella Shilova (Diptera). I.L. arenicola Shil. andL. moderata Kalug. In: G.Y. Dévai, ed., Advances in Chironomidology. Acta Biol. Debr. Oecol. Hung., 2: 115–128.Google Scholar
  20. KLINK, A.G., 1989. The Lower Rhine: Palaeoecological Analysis. In: G.E. Petts ed., Historical change of large alluvial rivers: Western Europe: 183–201. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  21. LINDEGAARD, C. and P.M. JÓNASSON, 1979. Abundance, population dynamics and production of zoobenthos in Lake Myvatn, Iceland. Oikos, 32: 202–227.Google Scholar
  22. MOLLER PILLOT, H.K.M., and R.F.M. BUSKENS, 1990. The larvae of the Dutch Chironomidae (Diptera) Part C: Autecology and dispersal. Ned. Faunistische Mededelingen, 1C: 1–85. European Invertebrate Survey, P.O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands (in Dutch).Google Scholar
  23. MOSS, B., 1980. Ecology of fresh waters. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford. 332 pp.Google Scholar
  24. RYSER, H.M., A. SCHOLL and W. WÜLKER, 1983. Revision der GattungChironomus (Diptera) VII:C. muratensis undC. nudiventris. Geschwischter Arten aus derplumosus Gruppe. Rev. Suisse Zool., 90: 299–316.Google Scholar
  25. SHILOVA, A.I., 1961. New genus and species of tendipedids (Diptera: Tendipedidae)Lipiniella SHILOVA, gen. n. Bill. Inst. biol. Vodokhran., 11: 19–23. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  26. SHILOVA, A.I., 1976. Chironomids of the Rybinsk reservoirs. Izd. Nauka, Leningrad, 249 pp (in Russian).Google Scholar
  27. SHILOVA, A.I., I.E. KERKIS and I.I. KIKNADZE, 1992. A review of the species of the genusLipiniella Shilova (Diptera, Chironomidae) II:L. prima sp. n. Neth. J. Aquat. Ecol., 26: 197–202.Google Scholar
  28. SMIT, H., P. KLAREN and W. SNOEK, 1991.Lipiniella arenicola Shilova (Diptera: Chironomidae) on a sandy flat in the Rhine-Meuse estuary: Distribution, population structure, biomass and production of larvae in relation to periodical drainage. Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol., 24: 2918–2923.Google Scholar
  29. SWEERTS, J.-P.R.A., 1990. Oxygen consumption processes, mineralisation and nitrogen cycling at the sediment-water interface of North temperate lakes. PhD thesis, University of Groningen, 136 pp.Google Scholar
  30. VAN NES, E.H. and H. SMIT. Multivariate analysis of macrozoobenthos in Lake Volkerak-Zoommeer (The Netherlands) before and after embankment. (accepted) Arch. Hydrobiol.Google Scholar
  31. VAN URK, G., F. KERKUM and H. SMIT, 1991. Life cycle patterns, density and frequency of deformities inChironomus larvae (Diptera: Chironomidae) over a contaminated sediment gradient. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 49: 2291–2299.Google Scholar
  32. VERDONSCHOT, P.F.M., 1990. Ecological characterisation of surface waters in the province of Overijssel (The Netherlands). PhD Thesis, Agricultural University Wageningen, 255 p.Google Scholar
  33. WALSHE, B.M., 1951. The feeding habits of certain chironomid larvae (subfamily Tendipedinae). Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 121: 63–79.Google Scholar
  34. WEINBERG, S., 1976. Submarine day light and ecology. Mar. Biol., 37: 291–304.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Netherlands Hydrobiological Society 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henk Smit
    • 1
  • Floor Heinis
    • 2
  • Ronald Bijkerk
    • 3
  • Frans Kerkum
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Inland Water Management and Waste Water TreatmentLelystadThe Netherlands
  2. 2.AquaSenseAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.RDD Aquatic EcosystemsHarenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations