Prospects

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 448–455 | Cite as

Helping parents to become partners in the education of their handicapped child

  • Hugh S. Taylor
Elements for a Dossier Educating Handicapped Children and Youth

Conclusions

Educators are beginning to seek methods of improving parent-child relationships and school and parent relationships, as the evidence accrues and is assimilated, which shows how much more important is the child's family experience. The handicapped child brings the desirability of successful home and school links into clear focus, as the six-hour school day is clearly inadequate for the needs of many severely handicapped children, who require a consistent programme of developmental experiences from waking to sleeping. The only way in which the trust and confidence imposed by close relationships in the home may be continued in the school is by a mutual effort directed at common goals: the development of the child's capacity to learn and care for himself. Perhaps it is the similarity of the tasks undertaken in home and in school, with the severely and profoundly handicapped child, the severely and profoundly handicapped child, which has shown just how powerful the home-and-school combination can be when working in harmony. There are clearly lessons here for the education system at large. Perhaps the longstanding schism between parents and schools can be bridged in the next decades.

The importance of social abilities, self-help skills and the confidence which all emanate from a successful family life, are emphasized by Smith and Sykes (1981) and others, who show that social competency is perhaps the key factor in determining vocational and post-school success for handicapped students. These competencies and confidence cannot come from school alone. The initiatives alluded to in this article, and described in full in the literature cited, show that schools have come a long way from believing that they alone can cope.

Keywords

Education System Family Life Social Competency Common Goal Handicapped Child 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Akehurst, J. 1980.Grief: A Family's Response to Impairment. Melbourne, Royal Victorian Institute for the Blind, 1980.Google Scholar
  2. Bergstrom, J.;Burdon, J. 1981. Parents as Educators: Innovative Options to Involve Educators, Parents and the Community.Australian Journal of Early Childhood, Vol. 6, No. 1, March, pp. 16–23.Google Scholar
  3. Bernstein, B., 1961. Social Structure, Language and Learning.Educational Research, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 63–6.Google Scholar
  4. Craft, R.;Cohen, L.;Raynor, D. (eds.). 1972.Linking Home and School. London, Longmans.Google Scholar
  5. Illich, Ivan, 1980.The Disabling Professions. Salem, N.H., Merrimack Book Services.Google Scholar
  6. Jan, J. E.;Freeman, R. D.;Scott, E. P. 1977.Visual Impairmment in Children and Adolescents. New York, Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
  7. Langdon, J. 1969. A Matter of Concern.New Beacon, Vol. 52, No. 612, pp. 282–6.Google Scholar
  8. Lowenfeld, B. 1976.Our Blind Children-Growing and Learning with Them. 3rd ed. Springfield, Ill., C. C. Thomas.Google Scholar
  9. Newell, P. 1981. The Case of the Missing Provision.The Time Educational Supplement, 11 January, p. 19.Google Scholar
  10. Pine Brook Report. 1954.National Work Session on the Education of the Blind with the Sighted. New York, American Foundation for the Blind. (Group Report, 2).Google Scholar
  11. Pritchard, D. G. 1963.The Handicapped 1760–1960. London, Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  12. Rees, R. 1980. On Being Informed: Parent Attitudes to Services for Children with Special Needs.Australian Journal of Special Education, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 26–33.Google Scholar
  13. Scott, E. P.;Jan, J. E.;Freeman, R. D. 1977.Can't your Child See? A Guide for Parents and Professionals. Baltimore, University Park Press.Google Scholar
  14. Shearer, Ann. 1981. Keeping Kids under Lock and Key.Guardian, 15 April, p. 17.Google Scholar
  15. Smith, H. M. T.;Sykes, S. C. 1981. Parents' Views on the Development of Social Competencies in their Mildly Intellectually Handicapped Adolescents.Australian Journal of Developmental Disabilities, vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 17–26.Google Scholar
  16. Taylor, H. S. 1981. A Survey of Children under Six Years of Age Identified by Agencies Serving Visually Impaired Children in Melbourne, 1979–80.Special, Vol. 16, No. 1.Google Scholar
  17. Taylor, T. 1977. A New Partnership.Times Educational Supplement, 23 September, pp. 7–9.Google Scholar
  18. Taylor, W. 1972. Family, School and Society. In: R. Craft, L. Cohen and D. Raynor (eds.),Linking Home and School. London, Longmans.Google Scholar
  19. Vernon, M. D. (ed.). 1972.The Education of the Visually Handicapped. London, HMSO. (Report of Committee of Inquiry.).Google Scholar
  20. Warnock, H. M. (ed.) 1978.Special Educational Needs: Report of the Committee of Enquiry into the Education of Handicapped Children and Young People. London, HMSO.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Unesco 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hugh S. Taylor
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.UK
  2. 2.Burwood State CollegeAustralia

Personalised recommendations