International Journal of Biometeorology

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 107–116 | Cite as

Comparative particle recoveries by the retracting rotorod, rotoslide and Burkard spore trap sampling in a compact array

  • W. R. Solomon
  • H. A. Burge
  • J. R. Boise
  • M. Becker


An array comprising 4 intermittent (retracting) rotorods, 3 (“swingshield”) rotoslides and one Burkard (Hirst) automatic volumetric spore trap was operated on an urban rooftop during 70 periods of 9, 15 or 24 hours in late summer. Standard sampling procedures were utilized and recoveries of pollens as well as spores ofAlternaria, Epicoccum, Pithomyces andGanoderma species compared. Differences between paired counts from each sampler type showed variances increasing with levels of particle prevalence (and deposition). In addition, minimal, non-random, side-to-side and intersampler differences were noted for both impactor types. Exclusion of particles between operating intervals by rotoslides and rotorods was virtually complete. Spore trap recoveries for all particle categories, per m3, exceeded those by both impactors. The greatest (7-fold) difference was noted for the smallest type examined (Ganoderma). For ragweed pollen, an overall spore trap/impactor ratio approached 1.5. Rain effects were difficult to discern but seemed to influence rotoslides least. Overall differences between impactors were quite small but generally favored the rotoslide in this comparison. Our data confirm the relative advantages of suction traps for small particles. Both impactors and spore traps are suited to pollen and large spore collection, and, with some qualification, data from both may be compared.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. BATCHELDER, G. L. (1977): Sampling characteristics of the rotorod, rotoslide, and Andersen machines for atmospheric pollen and spores. Ann. Allergy, 39: 18–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. BENAIM, C. (1973): Staining of biologic airborne particles caught with the rotorod sampler. Ann. Allergy, 31: 618–620.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. BURGE, P. P., BOISE, J. R., RUTHERFORD, J. A. and SOLOMON, W. R. (1977): Comparative recoveries of airborne fungus spores by viable and non-viable modes of volumetric collection. Mycopathologia (Den Haag), 61: 27–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. DINGLE, A. N. (1957): Meteorological considerations in ragweed hay fever research. Fed. Proc., 16: 615–627.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. GREGORY, P. H. (1957): The Microbiology of the Atmosphere. 2nd Ed, Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  6. OGDEN, E.C., and RAYNOR, G. S. (1967): A new sampler for pollen: the rotoslide. J. Allergy, 40: 1–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. OGDEN, E. C., RAYNOR, G. S., HAYES, J. V., LEWIS, D. M. and HAINES, J. H. (1974): Manual for Sampling Airborne Pollen, Hafner Press, New York, 84.Google Scholar
  8. RAYNOR, G. S., (1972): An isokinetic sampler for use on light aircraft. Atoms. Environ., 6: 191–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. RAYNOR, G. S., HAYES, J. V. and OGDEN, E.C. (1970): Experimental data on ragweed pollen dispersion and deposition from point and area sources. Brookhaven Nat. Lab., Upton, New York 50224, (T-564).Google Scholar
  10. RAYNOR, G. S. and OGDEN, E. C. (1970): The swing-shield: an improved shielding device for the intermittent rotoslide sampler. J. Allergy, 45: 329–332.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. SOLOMON, W. R., and MATHEWS, K. P. (1978): Aerobiology and inhalant allergens. (ed. In: Allergy-Principles and Pratice. E. Middleton, Jr., C. E. Reed E. F. Ellis. Mosby Co., St. Louis.Google Scholar
  12. WATSON, H. H. (1954): Errors due to anisokinetic sampling of aerosols. Amer. Ind. Hyg. Ass. Quart., 15: 21–25.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Swets & Zeitlinger B.V. 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. R. Solomon
    • 1
  • H. A. Burge
  • J. R. Boise
  • M. Becker
  1. 1.Section of Allergy, Dept. of Internal Medicine, (Medical School) and Dept. of Epidemiology (School of Public Health)University of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations