This prospective, randomized, controlled study was undertaken to compare primary repair or anastomosis with intracolonic bypass vs. ostomy in severe colon and intraperitoneal rectal injury. Patients were randomized at surgery following confirmation of injury. Data collected included demographics, mechanism and location of injury, trauma score (TS), injury severity score (ISS), penetrating abdominal trauma index (PATI), complications, length of hospital stay, and hospital charges. Twenty-two patients were studied: 11 with intracolonic bypass and 11 controls. The experimental and control groups were statistically similar in demographics and mechanism of injury, severity of injury (TS=13.8 vs. 12.8; ISS=27.5 vs. 24.2; PATI=40.5 vs. 35.0), and complication rate. Length of stay (12.2 days vs. 20.7 days) and charges $27,885 vs. $53,599) tended to be greater in controls, and the comparison did not include subsequent colostomy closure. This study supports intracolonic bypass as a safe alternative to ostomy in severe colon and intraperitoneal rectal trauma.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Ogilvie WH. Abdominal wounds in the western desert. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1944;78:225–38.
Burch JM, Brock JC, Gevirtzman L,et al. The injured colon. Ann Surg 1986;230:701–11.
Williams RA, Csepanyl E, Hiatt J,et al. Analysis of morbidity, mortality, and cost of colostomy closure in traumatic compared with nontraumatic colorectal disease. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:164.
Tucker JW, Fey WP. The management of perforating injuries of the colon and rectum in civilian practice. Surgery 1954;35:213–20.
Stone HH, Fabian TC. Management of perforating colon trauma. Ann Surg 1979;190:430–5.
Chappuis CW, Frey DJ, Dietzen CD, Panetta TP, Buechter KJ, Cohn I. Management of penetrating colon injuries. Ann Surg 1991;213:492–8.
Flint LM, Vitale GC, Richardson JD, Polk HC. The injured colon: relationships of management to complications. Ann Surg 1981;193:619–22.
Shannon FL, Moore EE. Primary repair of the colon: when is it a safe alternative? Surgery 1985;98:851–7.
George SM, Fabian TC, Voeller GR. Primary repair of colon wounds: a prospective trial in non selected patients. Ann Surg 1989;209:728–34.
Nallathambi MN, Ivatury RR, Shah PM, Gaudino J, Stahl WM. Aggressive definitive management of penetrating colon injuries: 136 cases with a 3.7 percent mortality. J Trauma 1984;24:500–5.
Ger R, Ravo B. Prevention and treatment of intestinal dehiscence by an intraluminal bypass graft. Br J Surg 1984;71:726–9.
Ravo B. The intracolonic bypass procedure. Int J Colorectal Dis 1987;2:1–5.
Ravo B. Colorectal anastomosis healing and intracolonic bypass procedure. Surg Clin North Am 1988;68:1267–94.
Ravo B, Ger R. Temporary colostomy—an outmoded procedure? Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:904–7.
Ravo B, Mishrick A, Addei K,et al. The treatment of perforated diverticulitis by one stage intracolonic bypass procedure. Surgery 1987;102:771–6.
Champion HR, Sacco WJ, Carnazzo AZ. Trauma score. Crit Care Med 1981;9:672–6.
Baker SP, O'Neill B, Haddon W, Long WG. The injury severity score. J Trauma 1974;14:177–96.
Moore EE, Dunn EL, Moore JB. Penetrating abdominal trauma index. J Trauma 1981;21:439–45.
Parks SE, Hastings PR. Complications of colostomy closure. Am J Surg 1985;149:672–5.
This study was done at Grant Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio. Product and administrative support was provided by Deknatel, Inc., Fall River, Massachusetts.
About this article
Cite this article
Falcone, R.E., Wanamaker, S.R., Santanello, S.A. et al. Colorectal trauma: Primary repair or anastomosis with intracolonic bypass vs. ostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 35, 957–963 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02253498
- Colorectal injury
- Primary repair
- Intracolonic bypass