Advertisement

Journal of Adult Development

, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp 99–112 | Cite as

The relations of generative concern and generative action to personality traits, satisfaction/happiness with life, and ego development

  • Ed de St. Aubin
  • Dan P. McAdams
Article

Abstract

This research examined the relations that generative concern and generative action have to personality traits, satisfaction/happiness with life, and ego development. Generative concern is a general personality tendency or interest in caring for younger and anticipated individuals, while generative action addresses actual physical behaviors that promote the well-being of future generations. Two samples (79 and 152 adults) were employed. Generative concern scores were significantly related to scores for extraversion, openness, emotional stability (non-neuroticism), and agreeableness as well as to two agentic traits (achievement, dominance) and two communal traits (affiliation, nurturance). Generative action was significantly related to extraversion and openness. Generative concern but not generative action was found, as predicted, to be positively related to one's life satisfaction/happiness. Further, one's level of ego development determined, in part, the relation that generative concern had to satisfaction/happiness with life. Given that a subject scored high in ego development, his or her level of satisfaction/happiness varied as a function of generative concern such that those who scored low on generative concern were significantly less satisfied/happy than those that scored high on generative concern. The results are discussed within the context of the recently proposed theory of generativity.

Key words

Generativity adult personality ego development satisfaction with life 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, S. A., Russell, C. S., & Schumm, W. R. (1983). Perceived marital quality and family life cycle categories: A further analysis.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 127–139.Google Scholar
  2. Baumeister, R. F. (1991).Meanings in life. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, E. (1973).The denial of death. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bellah, R. N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swindler, A., & Tipton, S. M. (1991).The good society. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  5. Browning, D. S. (1975).Generative man: Psychoanalytic perspectives. New York: Dell.Google Scholar
  6. Buss, A. H. (1989). Personality as traits.American Psychologist, 44, 1378–1388.Google Scholar
  7. Conley, J. J. (1985). Longitudinal stability of personality traits: A multitrait-multimethod-multi-occasion analysis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1266–1282.Google Scholar
  8. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1985a). Concurrent validation after 20 years: Implications of personality stability for its assessment. In J. N. Butcher & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.),Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 4, pp. 31–54). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1985b).The NEO Personality Inventory manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  10. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1988). Personality in Adulthood: A six-year longitudinal study of self-reports and spouse ratings on the NEO personality inventory.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 853–863.Google Scholar
  11. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larson, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale.Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–76.Google Scholar
  12. Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. In M. R. Rosenzweig & L. W. Porter (Eds.),Annual review of psychology (Vol. 41, pp. 417–440). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews, Inc.Google Scholar
  13. Digman, J. M., & Takemoto-Chock, N. K. (1981). Factors in the natural language of personality: Re-analysis, comparison, and interpretation of six major studies.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 16, 149–170.Google Scholar
  14. Erikson, E. H. (1987). The dream specimen of psychoanalysis. In S. Schlein (Ed.),A way of looking at things: Selected papers from 1930 to 1980 Erik H. Erikson. New York: Norton. (Work originally published inThe Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 2, 5–56.)Google Scholar
  15. Erikson, E. H. (1958).Young man Luther: A study in psychoanalysis and history. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  16. Erikson, E. H. (1963).Childhood and society. (2nd ed). New York: Norton. (Work originally published in 1950.)Google Scholar
  17. Erikson, E. H. (1964).Insight and responsibility. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  18. Erikson, E. H. (1969).Gandhi's truth: On the origins of militant nonviolence. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  19. Erikson, E. H. (1975).Life history and the historical moment. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  20. Erikson, E.H. (1982).The life cycle completed. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  21. Eysenck, H. J. (1990). Genetic and environmental contributions to individual differences: The three major dimensions of personality.Journal of Personality, 58, 245–262.Google Scholar
  22. Glenn, N. D., & McLanahan, S. (1982). Children and marital happiness: A further specification of the relationship.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 63–72.Google Scholar
  23. Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. In L. Wheeler (Ed.),Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 141–166). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Hauser, S. T. (1976). Loevinger's model and measure of ego development: A critical review.Psychological Bulletin, 80, 928–955.Google Scholar
  25. Hawley, G. A. (1986).Construction and validation of an Eriksonian measure of psychosocial development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
  26. Jackson, D. N. (1974).The Personality Research Form. Port Huron, MI: Research Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  27. Jackson, D. N. (1976).Jackson Personality Inventory manual. Goshen, NY: Research Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  28. Jacques, E. (1965). Death and the midlife crisis.International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 46, 502–514.Google Scholar
  29. John, O. P. (1989). Towards a taxonomy of personality descriptors. In D. M. Buss and N. Cantor (Eds.),Personality psychology: Recent trends and emerging directions. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  30. John, O. P. (1990). The “Big Five” taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. In L. Pervin (Ed.),Handbook of personality theory and research (pp. 66–100). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  31. Kotre, J. (1984).Outliving the self: Generativity and the interpretation of lives. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Lee, L., & Snarey, J. (1988). The relationship between ego and moral development: A theoretical review and empirical analysis. In D. K. Lapsely & F. C. Power (Eds.),Self, ego, and identity: Integrative approaches (pp. 151–178). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  33. Lifton, R. J. (1974). The sense of immortality: On death and the continuity of life. In R. J. Lifton (Ed.),Explorations in Psychohistory (pp. 271–287). New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  34. Lifton, R. J. (1979).The broken connection: On death and the continuity if life. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  35. Loevinger, J. (1966). The meaning and development of ego development.American Psychologist, 21, 195–206.Google Scholar
  36. Loevinger, J. (1976).Ego development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  37. Loevinger, J. (1979). Construct validity of the sentence completion test of ego development.Applied Psychological Measurement, 3, 281–311.Google Scholar
  38. Loevinger, J. (1983). On ego development and the structure of personality.Developmental Review, 3, 339–350.Google Scholar
  39. Loevinger, J. (1984). On the self and predicting behavior. In R. A. Zucker, J. Aronoff, & A. I. Rabin (Eds.),Personality and the prediction of behavior (pp. 43–68). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  40. Loevinger, J. (1985). Revision of the sentence completion test for ego development.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 420–427.Google Scholar
  41. Loevinger, J. (1987).Paradigms of personality. New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  42. Lopata, H. Z. (1971).Occupation: Housewife. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  43. McAdams, D. P. (1985).Power, intimacy, and the life story: Personological inquiries into identity. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  44. McAdams, D. P. (1994).The person: An introduction to personality psychology. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
  45. McAdams, D. P., Diamond, A., de St. Aubin, E. & Mansfield, E. (1995).Stories of commitment: The psychosocial construction of generative lives. Manuscript under revision.Google Scholar
  46. McAdams, D. P., Ruetzel, K., & Foley, J. M. (1986). Complexity and generativity at mid-life: A study of biographical scripts for the future.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 800–807.Google Scholar
  47. McAdams, D. P., & de St. Aubin, E. (1992). A theory of generativity and its assessment through self-report, behavioral acts, and narrative themes in autobiography.Journal of Personality and Social and Social Psychology, 62, 1003–1015.Google Scholar
  48. McAdams, D. P., de St. Aubin, E., & Logan, R. (1993). Generativity among young, midlife, and older adults.Psychology and Aging, 8, 221–230.Google Scholar
  49. McCrae, R. R. (1989). Why I advocate the five factor model: Joint analyses of the NEO-PI with other instruments. In D. M. Buss and N. Cantor (Eds.),Personality psychology: Recent trends and emerging directions. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  50. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1987). Validation of the five factor model of personality across instruments and observers.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81–90.Google Scholar
  51. Murray, H. A. (1938).Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Nestor, T. (1988).Celibacy and generativity. Unpublished master's thesis, Loyola University, Chicago.Google Scholar
  53. Norman, W. T. (1963). Towards an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 574–583.Google Scholar
  54. Ochse, R., & Plug, C. (1986). Cross-cultural investigation of the validity of Erikson's theory of personality development.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1240–1252.Google Scholar
  55. Peterson, B. E., & Stewart, A. J. (1990). Using personal and fictional documents to assess psychosocial development: A case study of Vera Brittain's generativity.Psychology and Aging, 5, 400–411.Google Scholar
  56. Peterson, B. E., & Stewart, A. J. (1994).Antecedents and contexts of generativity motivation at midlife. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  57. Raskin, R. N., & Hall, C. J. (1979). A narcissistic personality inventory.Psychological Reports, 45, 590.Google Scholar
  58. Raskin, R. N., & Hall, C. J. (1981). The Narcissistic Personality Inventory: Alternate form reliability and further evidence of construct validity.Journal of Personality Assessment, 45, 159–162.Google Scholar
  59. Redmore, C., & Waldman, K. (1975). Reliability of a sentence completion measure of ego development.Journal of Personality Assessment, 39, 236–243.Google Scholar
  60. Roszanafszky, J. (1981). The relationship of level of ego development to Q-sort personality ratings.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 99–120.Google Scholar
  61. Ryff, C. D., & Heincke, S. G. (1983). Subjective organization of personality in adulthood and aging.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 807–816.Google Scholar
  62. Ryff, C. D., & Migdal, S. (1984). Intimacy and generativity: Self perceived transitions.Signs, 9, 470–481.Google Scholar
  63. de St. Aubin, E. (1992, May). Generative commitment: Its role within personality, its measurement, and its relation to the concern, action and narration components of generativity. In E. de St. Aubin (Chair),Emerging perspectives in adult personality development: Research concerning generativity. Symposium conducted at the Midwestern Psychological Convention, Chicago.Google Scholar
  64. Stewart, A. J., Franz, C., & Layton, L. (1988). The changing self: Using personal documents to study lives.Journal of Personality, 56, 41–47.Google Scholar
  65. Vaillant, G. E. (1977).Adaptation to life. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  66. Vaillant, G. E. (1993).The wisdom of the ego. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Vaillant, G. E., & Milofsky, E. (1980). The natural history of male psychological health: IX. Empirical evidence for Erikson's model of the life cycle.American Journal of Psychiatry, 137, 1348–1359.Google Scholar
  68. Van de Water, D. (1987).Present and future in generativity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Loyola University, Chicago.Google Scholar
  69. Van de Water, D., & McAdams, D. P. (1989). Generativity and Erikson's “belief in the species.”Journal of Research in Personality, 23, 435–449.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ed de St. Aubin
    • 2
  • Dan P. McAdams
    • 1
  1. 1.Northwestern UniversityEvanston
  2. 2.Human DevelopmentUniversity of Wisconsin—Green BayGreen Bay

Personalised recommendations