Advertisement

Health Care Analysis

, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp 119–123 | Cite as

Paper one: The distinction between prospective and retrospective responsibility

  • Henk ten Have
Discussion Responsibilities And Rationalities: Should The Patient Be Blamed?

Keywords

Public Health Retrospective Responsibility 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Nota 2000. Over de ontwikkeling van gezondheidsbeleid: feiten, beschouwingen — beleidsvoornemens. (1986). Staatsuitgeverij, Den Haag, 10.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lalonde, M. (1974).A New Perspective on the Health of Canadians, Ottawa, Government of Canada.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Leeuw, E. de. (1989).The Sane Revolution. Health Promotion: Backgrounds, Scope, Purpose, Van Gorcum, Assen/Maastricht.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rouwenhorst, W. (1981).Om onze gezondheid: de rol van gezondheidsvoorlichting en—opvoeding, Samson, Alphen aan den Rijn.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nordenfelt, L. (1987).On the Nature of Health. An Action-Theoretic Approach, Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Green, L. W., Kreuter, M. W., Deeds, S. G. and Partridge, K. B. (1980).Health Education Planning. A Diagnostic Approach, Mayfield, Palo Alto, California.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kok, G. J. (1986).Gezondheidsmotivering. GVO als wetenschapsgebied, Rede Rijksuniversiteit Limburg, Maastricht.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Agich, G. J. (1982). The concept of responsibility in medicine. In,Responsibility in Health Care, ed. by G. J. Agich, Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Frankena, W. K. (1973).Ethics, Englewood Cliffs NJ, Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Beaufort, I. D. de. (1991). Eigen schuld, dikke bult: een pijnlijke kwestie? In,Kiezen en delen. Achtergrondstudies in opdracht van de commissie Keuzen in de zorg, DOP, Den Haag6, 1–28.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Have, H. A. M. J. ten. (1987). Ethische aspecten van GVO. In,Gezondheidsvoorlichting en—Opvoeding. Van analyse tot effecten, ed. by V. Damoiseaux, F. M. Gerards, G. J. Kok and F. Nijhuis, Van Gorcum, Assen/Maastricht.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Have, H. A. M. J. ten. (1993). Ethiek. In,Gezondheidsvoorlichting en gedragsverandering, ed. by V. Damoiseaux, H. T. van der Molen and G. J. Kok, Van Gorcum/Open Universiteit, Assen/Heerlen.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henk ten Have
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Ethics, Philosophy and History of Medicine, School of Medical SciencesCatholic University of NiimegenNijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations