Lie superalgebras

D. V. Alekseevskii, D. A. Leites, and I. M. Shchepochkina, “Examples of simple, infinite-dimensional Lie superalgebras of vector fields,” Dokl. Bolg. Akad. Nauk,33, No. 9, 1187–1190 (1980).Google Scholar

A. A. Beilinson, “Coherent sheaves on Pⁿ and problems of linear algebra,” Funkts. Anal. Prilozhen.,12, No. 3, 68–69 (1978).Google Scholar

A. A. Beilinson, “The derived category of coherent sheaves on Pⁿ,” in: Vopr. Teor. Grupp i Gomol. Algebry (Yaroslavl'), No. 2, 42–54 (1979).Google Scholar

F. A. Berezin, “Representations of the supergroup U(p, q),” Funkts. Anal. Prilozhen.,10, No. 3, 70–71 (1976).Google Scholar

F. A. Berezin, Introduction to Algebra and Analysis in Commuting and Anticommuting Variables [in Russian], Moscow State Univ. (1983).Google Scholar

F. A. Berezin and D. A. Leites, “Supermanifolds,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR,224, No. 3, 505–508 (1975).Google Scholar

I. N. Bernshtein, I. M. Gel'fand, and S. I. Gel'fand, “Algebraic bundles on Pⁿ and problems of linear algebra,” Funkts. Anal. Prilozhen.,12, No. 3, 66–68 (1978).Google Scholar

I. N. Bernshtein and D. A. Leites, “Integral forms and the Stokes formula on supermanifolds,” Funkts. Anal. Prilozhen.,11, No. 1, 55–56 (1977).Google Scholar

I. N. Bernshtein and D. A. Leites, “Irreducible representations of finite-dimensional Lie superalgebras of the series W,” in: Vopr. Teorii Grupp i Gomol. Algebry (Yaroslavl'), No. 2, 187–193 (1979).Google Scholar

I. N. Bernshtein and D. A. Leites, “A formula for the characters of irreducible finite-dimensional representations of Lie superalgebras of the series H and sl,” Dokl. Bolg. Akad. Nauk,33, No. 8, 1049–1051 (1980).Google Scholar

I. N. Bernshtein and D. A. Leites, “Invariant differential operators and irreducible representations of a Lie algebra of vector fields,” Serdika B"lg. Mat. Spisanie,7, 320–334 (1981).Google Scholar

N. Bourbaki, Lie Groups and Algebras [Russian translation], Mir, Moscow (1978).Google Scholar

Yu. I. Manin (ed.), Geometric Ideas in Physics [Russian translation], Mir, Moscow (1983).Google Scholar

P. Ya. Grozman, “Classification of bilinear invariant operators on tensor fields,” Funkts. Anal. Prilozhen.,14, No. 2, 58–59 (1980).Google Scholar

J. Dixmier, Enveloping Algebras, Elsevier (1977).Google Scholar

V. G. Drinfel'd and Yu. I. Manin, “Yang-Mills fields, instantons, tensor products of instantons,” Yad. Fiz.,29, No. 6, 1646–1654 (1979).Google Scholar

A. A. Zaitsev and L. V. Nikolenko, “Indecomposable representations of the Grassman algebra,” Funkts. Anal. Prilozhen.,4, No. 3, 101–102 (1970).Google Scholar

V. G. Kats, “On the classification of simple Lie superalgebras,” Funkts. Anal. Prilozhen.,9, No. 3, 91–92 (1975).Google Scholar

V. G. Kats, “Classification of simple algebraic supergroups,” Usp. Mat. Nauk,32, No. 3, 214–215 (1977).Google Scholar

V. G. Kats, “Letter to the editor,” Funkts. Anal. Prilozhen.,10, No. 2, 93 (1976).Google Scholar

A. A. Kirillov, Elements of the Theory of Representations [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1972).Google Scholar

A. A. Kirillov, “On invariant differential operators on geometric quantities,” Funkts. Anal. Prilozhen.,11, No. 2, 39–44 (1977).Google Scholar

A. A. Kirillov, “Invariant operators on geometric quantities,” in: Sovremennye Problemy Matematiki, Vol. 16 (Itogi Nauki i Tekh. VINITI Akad. Nauk SSSR), Moscow (1980), pp. 3–29.Google Scholar

A. A. Kirillov, “Orbits of the group of diffeomorphisms of the circle and local Lie superalgebras,” Funkts. Anal. Prilozhen.,15, No. 2, 75–76 (1981).Google Scholar

R. Yu. Kirillova, “Explicit solutions of supered Toda lattices,” in: Zap. Nauchn. Sem. Leningr. Otd. Mat. Inst. AN SSSR,123 (1983), pp. 98–111.Google Scholar

I. A. Kostrikin, “Irreducible graded representations of Lie algebras of Cartan type,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR,243, No. 3, 565–567 (1978).Google Scholar

I. A. Kostrikin, “Representations of height 1 of infinite-dimensional Lie algebras of the series K,” Moscow State Univ., No. 2737-79 Dep (1979).Google Scholar

Yu. Yu. Kochetkov, “Irreducible induced representations of Leites superalgebras,” in: Vopr. Teoriii Grupp i Gomol. Algebry (Yaroslavl'), No. 3, 120–123 (1983).Google Scholar

Yu. Yu. Kochetkov, “Irreducible induced representations of Lie superalgebras of the series SLe(n),” YarGU, No. 3917-83 Dep (1983).Google Scholar

A. N. Leznov and M. V. Savel'ev, Group Methods of Integrating Nonlinear Dynamical Systems [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1984).Google Scholar

D. A. Leites, “Cohomologies of Lie superalgebras,” Funkts. Anal. Prilozhen.,9, No. 4, 75–76 (1975).Google Scholar

D. A. Leites, “Introduction to the theory of supermanifolds,” Usp. Mat. Nauk,35, No. 1, 3–57 (1980).Google Scholar

D. A. Leites, “A formula for the characters of irreducible, finite-dimensional representations of Lie superalgebras of the series C,” Dokl. Bolg. Akad. Nauk,33, No. 8, 1053–1055 (1980).Google Scholar

D. A. Leites, “Formulas for the characters of irreducible, finite-dimensional representations of simple Lie superalgebras,” Funkts. Anal. Prilozhen.,14, No. 2, 35–39 (1980).Google Scholar

D. A. Leites, Irreducible representations of Lie superalgebras of vector fields and invariant differential operators,” Funkts. Anal. Prilozhen.,16, No. 1, 76–78 (1982).Google Scholar

D. A. Leites, “Automorphisms and real forms of Lie superalgebras of vector fields,” in: Vopr. Teorii Grupp i Gomol. Algebry (Yaroslavl') (1983), pp. 126–127.Google Scholar

D. A. Leites, “Representations of Lie superalgebras,” Teor. Mat. Fiz.,52, No. 2, 225–228 (1982).Google Scholar

D. A. Leites, “Irreducible representations of Lie superalgebras of divergence-free vector fields and invariant differential operators,” Serkida B"lg. Mat. Spisanie,8, No. 1, 12–15 (1982).Google Scholar

D. A. Leites, Theory of Supermanifolds [in Russian], Izd. KFAN SSSR, Petrozavodsk (1983).Google Scholar

D. A. Leites, “Clifford algebras as superalgebras and quantization,” Teor. Mat. Fiz.,58, No. 2, 229–232 (1984).Google Scholar

D. A. Leites and M. A. Semenov-Tyan-Shanskii, “Lie superalgebras and integrable systems,” in: Zap. Nauchn. Seminarov Leningr. Otd. Mat. Inst. AN SSSR, Vol. 123, Nauka, Leningrad (1983), pp. 92–97.Google Scholar

D. A. Leites and V. V. Serganova, “Solutions of the classical Yang-Baxter equation for simple Lie superalgebras,” Teor. Mat. Fiz.,58, No. 1, 26–37 (1984).Google Scholar

D. A. Leites and B. L. Feigin, “Kac-Moody superalgebras,” in: Teoretiko-gruppovye Metody v Fizike [in Russian], Vol. 1, Nauka, Moscow (1983), pp. 274–278.Google Scholar

D. A. Leites and B. L. Feigin, “New Lie superalgebras of string theories,” in: Teoretiko-gruppovye Metody v Fizike [in Russian], Vol. 1, Nauka, Moscow, pp. 269–273.Google Scholar

Yu. I. Manin, Gauge Fields and Complex Geometry [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1984), pp. 3–80.Google Scholar

Yu. I. Manin, “Holomorphic supergeometry and Yang-Mills superfields,” in: Sovremennye Problemy Matematiki, Vol. 24 (Itogi Nauki i Tekh. VINITI AN SSSR), Moscow (1984).Google Scholar

M. S. Marinov, “Relativistic strings and dual models of strong interactions,” Usp. Fiz. Nauk,121, No. 3, 377–425 (1977).Google Scholar

M. V. Mosalova, “On functions of noncommuting operators generating graded Lie algebras,” Mat. Zametki,29, No. 1, 35–44 (1980).Google Scholar

V. I. Ogievetskii, “Geometry of supergravitation,” in: Problemy Kvantovoi Teorii Polya, JINR, Dubna (1981), pp. 187–200.Google Scholar

V. I. Ogievetskii and L. Mezinchesku, “Symmetries between bosons and fermions and superfields,” Usp. Fiz. Nauk,117, No. 4, 637–683 (1975).Google Scholar

V. S. Retakh, “Massa operations in Lie superalgebras and differentials of the Quillen spectral sequence,” Funkts. Anal. Prilozhen.,12, No. 4, 91–92 (1978).Google Scholar

V. S. Retakh and B. L. Feigin, “On cohomologies of some Lie algebras and superalgebras of vector fields,” Usp. Mat. Nauk,37, No. 2, 233–234 (1982).Google Scholar

A. N. Rudakov, “Irreducible representations of infinite-dimensional Lie algebras of Cartan type,” Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Mat.,38, No. 3, 835–866 (1974).Google Scholar

A. N. Rudakov, “Irreducible representations of finite-dimensional Lie algebras of the series S and H,” Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Mat.,39, No. 3, 496–511 (1975).Google Scholar

V. V. Serganova, “Real forms of Kac-Moody superalgebras,” in: Teoretiko-gruppovye Metody v Fizike [in Russian], Vol. 1, Nauka, Moscow (1983), pp. 279–282.Google Scholar

V. V. Serganova, “Classification of simple real Lie superalgebras and symmetric superspaces,” Funkts. Anal. Prilozhen.,17, No. 3, 46–54 (1983).Google Scholar

V. V. Serganova, “Automorphisms and real forms of the superalgebras of string theories,” Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Mat.,48, No. 2 (1984).Google Scholar

A. N. Sergeev, “Invariant polynomial functions on Lie superalgebras,” Dokl. Bolg. Akad. Nauk,35, No. 5, 573–576 (1982).Google Scholar

A. A. Slavnov, “Supersymmetric gauge theories and their possible applications to weak and electromagnetic interactions,” Usp. Fiz. Nauk,124, No. 3, 487–508 (1978).Google Scholar

Group-Theoretic Methods in Physics [in Russian], Vols. 1, 2, Nauka, Moscow (1983).Google Scholar

B. L. Feigin and D. B. Fuks, “Verma modules over a Virasoro algebra,” Funkts. Anal. Prilozhen.,17, No. 3, 91–92 (1982).Google Scholar

D. Fridman and P. van N'yuvenkheizen, “Supergravitation and unification of the laws of physics,” Usp. Fiz. Nauk,128, No. 1, 135–156 (1979).Google Scholar

D. B. Fuks, Cohomologies of Infinite-Dimensional Lie Algebras [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1984).Google Scholar

Kh'eu NguenVan, “On the theory of representations of the superalgebra of extended supersymmetry,” Ob"edin. Inst. Yad. Issled., Dubna, Soobshch., No. P2-82-819 (1982).Google Scholar

A. V. Shapovalov, “Real irreducible representations of Hamiltonian Lie superalgebras,” No. 3448-80 Dep, Moscow State Univ. (1980).Google Scholar

A. V. Shapovalov, “Finite-dimensional irreducible representations of Hamiltonian Lie superalgebras,” Mat. Sb.,107, No. 2, 259–274 (1978).Google Scholar

A. V. Shapovalov, “Invariant differential operators and irreducible representations of finite-dimensional Hamiltonian and Poisson Lie superalgebras,” Serdika B"lg. Mat. Spisanie,7, No. 4, 337–342 (1981).Google Scholar

G. S. Shmelev, “Differential operators invariant relative to the Lie superalgebra H (2¦ 2; λ) and its irreducible representations,” Dokl. Bolg. Akad. Nauk,35, No. 3, 287–290 (1982).Google Scholar

G. S. Shmelev, “Invariant operators in symplectic superspace,” Mat. Sb.,112, No. 4, 21–38 (1983).Google Scholar

G. S. Shmelev, “Irreducible representations of infinite-dimensional Hamiltonian and Poisson Lie superalgebras and invariant differential operators,” Serdika B"lg. Mat. Spisanie,8, No. 4, 408–417 (1982).Google Scholar

G. S. Shmelev, “Irreducible representations of Poisson Lie superalgebras and invariant differential operators,” Funkts. Anal. Prilozhen.,17, No. 1, 91–92 (1983).Google Scholar

G. S. Shmelev, “Classification of indecomposable finite-dimensional representations of the Lie superalgebra W(0, 2),” Dokl. Bolg. Akad. Nauk,35, No. 8, 1025–1027 (1982).Google Scholar

I. M. Shchepochkina, “Exceptional simple infinite-dimensional Lie superalgebras,” Dokl. Bolg. Akad. Nauk,36, No. 3, 313–314 (1983).Google Scholar

Ademollo et al., “Dual string models, part 1,” Nucl. Phys.,B111, 1, 77–100 (1976); Part 2, Nucl. Phys.,B114, 2, 297–316 (1976).Google Scholar

Ademollo et al., “Supersymmetric strings and colour confinement,” Phys. Lett.,B62, 1, 105–110 (1976).Google Scholar

A. B. Balantekin and I. Bars, “Dimension and character formulas for Lie supergroups,” J. Math. Phys.,22, No. 6, 1149–1162 (1981).Google Scholar

A. B. Balantekin, “Representations of supergroups,” J. Math. Phys.,22, No. 8, 1810–1818 (1981).Google Scholar

A. B. Balantekin and I. Bars, “Branching rules for the supergroups SU(N/M) from those of SU(N+M),” J. Math. Phys.,23, No. 7, 1239–1247 (1982).Google Scholar

I. Bars, B. Morel, and H. Ruegg, “Kac-Dynkin diagrams and supertableaux,” J. Math. Phys.,24, No. 4, 201D–2262 (1983).Google Scholar

A. Beillinson and J. Bernstein, “Localisation de of modules,” C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris,292, No. 1, I-15–I-18 (1981).Google Scholar

A. Berele and A. Regev, “Hooke-Young diagrams, combinatorics, and representations of Lie superalgebras,” Bull. (New Series) Am. Math. Soc.,8, No. 2, 337–339 (1983).Google Scholar

F. A. Berezin, “The construction of Lie supergroups U(p, q) and C(m, n),” ITEP-76, Moscow, ITEP (1977).Google Scholar

F. A. Berezin, “The radial parts of the Laplace operators on the Lie supergroups U(p, q) and C(m, n),” ITEP-75, Moscow, ITEP (1977).Google Scholar

F. A. Berezin, “Lie superalgebras,” ITEP-66, Moscow, ITEP (1977).Google Scholar

F. A. Berezin, “The Laplace-Casimir operators (general theory),” ITEP (1977).Google Scholar

F. A. Berezin and V. N. Tolstoy, “The group with Grassman structure VOSp(1, 2),” Commun. Math. Phys.,78, No. 3, 409–428 (1981).Google Scholar

J. N. Bernstein and D. A. Leites, “The superalgebra Q(n), the odd trace, and the odd determinant,” Dokl. Bolg. Akad. Nauk,35, No. 3, 285–286 (1982).Google Scholar

J. Blank et al., “Boson-fermion representations of Lie superalgebras. The example of osp(1, 2),” J. Math. Phys.,23, No. 3, 350–353 (1982).Google Scholar

R. Blok, “Classification of the irreducible representations of S1(2, C),” Bull. Am. Math. Soc. (New Series),1, No. 1, 247–250 (1979).Google Scholar

J. L. Brylinski and M. Kashiwara, “Kazhdan-Lusztig conjecture and holonomic systems,” Invent. Math.,64, 387 (1981).Google Scholar

L. Corwin, Y. Ne'eman, and S. Sternberg, “Lie algebras in mathematics and physics,” Rev. Mod. Phys.,47, 573–604 (1975).Google Scholar

D. Z. Djokovic, “Superlinear algebras or two-graded algebraic structures,” Can. J. Math.,30, No. 6, 1336–1344 (1978).Google Scholar

V. V. Deodhar, O. Gabber, and V. G. Kac, “Structure of some categories of representations of infinite-dimensional Lie algebras,” Adv. Math.,45, 92–116 (1982).Google Scholar

I. B. Frenkel, “Spinor representation of affine Lie algebras,” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA Phys. Sci.,77, No. 11, 6303–6306 (1980).Google Scholar

I. B. Frenkel and V. G. Kac, “Basic representations of affine Lie algebras and dual resonance models, Invent. Math.,62, No. 1, 23–30 (1980).Google Scholar

F. Cursey and L. Marchildon, “The graded Lie groups SU(2, 2/1) and OSp(1/4),” J. Math. Phys.,19, No. 5, 942–951 (1978).Google Scholar

S. Helgason, Differential Geometry, Lie Groups, and Symmetric Spaces, Academic Press, New York (1978).Google Scholar

L. Hlavaty and J. Niederle, “Casimir operators of the simplest supersymmetry superalgebras,” Lett. Math. Phys.,4, No. 4, 301–306 (1980).Google Scholar

J. W. B. Hughes, “SU(2) shift operators and representations of Spl(2, 1),” Group Theor. Math. Phys., Kiryat Anavim, 1979, Bristol, e.a., pp. 320–322.Google Scholar

J. W. B. Hughes, “Representations of osp (2, 1) and the metaplectic representations,” J. Math. Phys., No. 2, 245–250 (1981).Google Scholar

J. P. Hurni and B. Morel, “Irreducible representations of the superalgebras of type II,” J. Math. Phys.,23, No. 12, 2236–2243 (1982).Google Scholar

J. P. Hurni and B. Morel, “Irreducible representations of SU(m/n),” J. Math. Phys.,24, No. 1, 157–163 (1983).Google Scholar

V. G. Kac, “A sketch of Lie superalgebras theory,” Commun. Math. Phys.,53, No. 1, 31–64 (1977).Google Scholar

V. G. Kac, “Lie superalgebras,” Adv. Math.,26, 8–96 (1977).Google Scholar

V. G. Kac, “Infinite-dimensional algebras, Dedekind's η-function, classical Moebius function, and the very strange formula,” Adv. Math.30, 85–136 (1978).Google Scholar

V. G. Kac, “Representations of classical Lie superalgebras,” Lect. Notes Math.,676, 597–626 (1978).Google Scholar

V. G. Kac, “On simplicity of certain infinite-dimensional Lie algebras,” Bull. Am. Math. Soc,2, No. 2, 311–314 (1980).Google Scholar

V. G. Kac, “An euclidation of ‘Infinite-dimensional algebras ... and the very strange formula,’ E₈ ⁽¹⁾ and the cube root of the modular invariant theory,” Adv. Math.,35, 264–273 (1980).Google Scholar

V. G. Kac, “Some problems on infinite-dimensional Lie algebras and their representations,” Lect. Notes Math.,933, 117–126 (1983).Google Scholar

V. G. Kac, Infinite-Dimensional Lie Algebras. An Introduction, Birkhauser, New York (1983).Google Scholar

V. G. Kac, “Classification of simple Z-graded Lie superalgebras and simple Jordan superalgebras,” Commun. Alg.,5, 1375–1400 (1977).Google Scholar

I. Kaplansky, “Superalgebras,” Pac. J. Math.,86, No. 1, 93–98 (1980).Google Scholar

I. Kaplansky, “Some simple Lie algebras of characteristic 2,” Lect. Notes Math.,933, 127–129 (1982).Google Scholar

J. L. Koszul, “Les algebras de Lie gradues de type sl(n, 1) et l'operateur de A. Capelli,” C. R. Acad. Sci.,292, Ser. 1, No. 2, 139–141 (1981).Google Scholar

F. W. Lemiere and J. Patera, “Congruence classes of finite-dimensional representations of simple Lie superalgebras,” J. Math. Phys.,23, No. 8, 1409–1414 (1982).Google Scholar

J. Lukierski, “Graded orthosymplectic geometry and invariant fermionic σ-models,” Lett. Math. Phys.,3, No. 2, 135–140 (1979).Google Scholar

J. Lukierski, “Complex and quaternionic supergeometry,” Supergravity Proc. Workshop, Stony Brook (1975), Amsterdam e.a. (1979), pp. 85–92.Google Scholar

J. Lukierski, “Quaternionic and supersymmetric σ-models,” Lect. Notes Math.,836, 221–245 (1980).Google Scholar

M. Marcu, “The tensor product of two irreducible representations of the Spl(2, 1) superalgebra,” J. Math. Phys.,21, No. 6, 1284–1292 (1980).Google Scholar

M. Marcu, “The representations of spl(2, 1) — an example of representations of basic superalgebras,” J. Math. Phys.,21, No. 6, 1277–1283 (1980).Google Scholar

Y. Ne'eman and J. Tierry-Mieg, “Gange asthenodynamics (SU(2/1)). Classical discussion,” Lect. Notes Math.,836, 318–348 (1980).Google Scholar

Tch. D. Palev, “Canonical realizations of Lie superalgebras: ladder representations of the Lie superalgebra A(m, n),” J. Math. Phys.,22, No. 10, 2127–2131 (1981).Google Scholar

Tch. D. Palev, “Fock space representations of the Lie superalgebra A(o, n),” J. Math. Phys.,21, No. 6, 1293–1298 (1980).Google Scholar

Tch. D. Palev, “On a class of nontypical representations of the Lie superalgebra A(1, 0),” Godishn. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved., Tekh. Fiz., 1979,16, 103–104 (1980).Google Scholar

M. Parker, “Real forms of simple finite-dimensional classical Lie superalgebras,” J. Math. Phys.,21, No. 4, 689–697 (1980).Google Scholar

P. Ramond and J. Schwarz, “Classification of dual model gauge algebras,” Phys. Lett.,B64, No. 1, 75–77 (1976).Google Scholar

V. Rittenberg and M. Schennert, “Elementary construction of graded Lie groups,” J. Math. Phys.,19, No. 3, 709–713 (1978).Google Scholar

V. Rittenberg and M. Schennert, “A remarkable connection between the representations of the Lie superalgebras Osp (1, 2n) and the Lie algebras 0 (2n+1),” Comm. Math. Phys.,83, 1–9 (1982).Google Scholar

V. Rittenberg and D. Wyler, “Sequence of Z₂ ⊕ Z₂-graded Lie algebras and superalgebras,” J. Math. Phys.,19, No. 10, 2193–2200 (1978).Google Scholar

M. Scheunert, “The theory of Lie superalgebras,” Lect. Notes Math.,716 (1979).Google Scholar

A. N. Sergeev, “The centre of enveloping algebra for Lie superalgebra Q(n, C),” Lett. Math. Phys.,7, 177–179 (1983).Google Scholar