Advertisement

Journal of Nonverbal Behavior

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 65–80 | Cite as

Lie experts' beliefs about nonverbal indicators of deception

  • Aldert Vrij
  • Gün R. Semin
Article

Abstract

Beliefs about behavioral clues to deception were investigated in 212 people, consisting of prisoners, police detectives, patrol police officers, prison guards, customs officers, and college students. Previous studies, mainly conducted with college students as subjects, showed that people have some incorrect beliefs about behavioral clues to deception. It was hypothesized that prisoners would have the best notion about clues of deception, due to the fact that they receive the most adequate feedback about successful deception strategies. The results supported this hypothesis.

Keywords

College Student Social Psychology Police Officer Custom Officer Patrol Police 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Burgoon, J. K., Kelly, D. L., Newton, D. A., & Keely-Dyreson, M. P. (1989). The nature of arousal and nonverbal indices.Human Communication Research, 16, 217–255.Google Scholar
  2. DePaulo, B. M. (1988). Nonverbal aspects of deception.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 12, 153–162.Google Scholar
  3. DePaulo, B. M. (1992). Nonverbal behavior and self-presentation.Psychological Bulletin, 111, 203–243.Google Scholar
  4. DePaulo, B. M., & Kirkendol, S. E. (1989). The motivational impairment effect in the communication of deception. In J. C. Yuille (Ed.),Credibility assessment (pp. 51–70). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. DePaulo, B. M., & Pfeifer, R. L. (1986). On-the-job experience and skill at detecting deception.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 249–267.Google Scholar
  6. DePaulo, B. M., Stone, J. L., & Lassiter, G. D. (1985). Deceiving and detecting deceit. In B. R. Schenkler (Ed.),The self and social life (pp. 323–370). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  7. Ekman, P. (1989). Why lies fail and what behaviors betray a lie. In J. C. Yuille (Ed.),Credibility assessment (pp. 71–82). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1972). Hand movements.Journal of Communication, 22, 353–374.Google Scholar
  9. Ekman, P., & O'Sullivan, M. (1991). Who can catch a liar?American Psychologist, 46, 913–920.Google Scholar
  10. Goldman-Eisler, F. (1968).Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  11. Höfer, E., Köhnken, G., Hanewinkel, R., & Brühn, C. (1992).Diagnostik und attribution von glaubwürdigkeit. Kiel: Final report to the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, KO 882/4-2.Google Scholar
  12. Knapp, M. L., Hart, R. P., & Dennis, H. S. (1974). An exploration of deception as a communication construct.Human Communication Research, 1, 15–29.Google Scholar
  13. Köhnken, G. (1987). Training police officers to detect deceptive eyewitness statements: Does it work?Social Behaviour, 2, 1–17.Google Scholar
  14. Köhnken, G. (1989). Behavioral correlates of statement credibility: Theories, paradigms and results. In H. Wegener, F. Lösel, & J. Haisch (Eds.),Criminal behavior and the justice system: Psychological perspectives (pp. 271–289). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  15. Köhnken, G. (1990).Glaubwürdigkeit: Untersuchungen zu einem psychologischen konstrukt. München: Psychologie Verlags Union.Google Scholar
  16. Kraut, R. E. (1978). Verbal and nonverbal cues in the perception of lying.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 380–391.Google Scholar
  17. Kraut, R. E., & Poe, D. (1980). On the line: The deception judgments of customs inspectors and laymen.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 380–391.Google Scholar
  18. Riggio, R. E., & Friedman, H. S. (1983). Individual differences and cues to deception.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 899–915.Google Scholar
  19. Siegman, A. W. (1985). Expressive correlates of affective states and traits. In A. W. Siegman & S. Feldstein (Eds.),Multichannel integrations of nonverbal behavior (pp. 37–68). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  20. Vrij, A. (1991).Misverstanden tussen politie en allochtonen: sociaal-psychologische aspecten van verdacht zijn. Amsterdam: VU Uitgeverij.Google Scholar
  21. Vrij, A., Foppes, J. H., Volger, D. M., & Winkel, F. W. (1992). Moeilijk te bepalen wie de waarheid spreekt: non-verbaal gedrag belangrijkste indicator.Algemeen Politie Blad, 141, 13–15.Google Scholar
  22. Vrij, A., & Winkel, F.W. (1992). Crosscultural police-citizen interactions: The influence of race, beliefs and nonverbal communication on impression formation.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1546–1559.Google Scholar
  23. Vrij, A. (1993a). Credibility judgments of detectives: The impact of nonverbal behavior, social skills and physical characteristics on impression formation.Journal of Social Psychology, 133, 601–612.Google Scholar
  24. Vrij, A. (1993b).Objectieve en subjectieve indicatoren van misleiding. Den Haag: Ministerie van Justitie, Recherche Advies Commissie.Google Scholar
  25. Vrij, A. (1994). The impact of information and setting on detection of deception by police detectives.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 18, 117–137.Google Scholar
  26. West, I. (1992, March).Decision making in the detection of deception. Paper presented at the British Psychological Society, Division of Criminological and Legal Psychology, Harrogate, England.Google Scholar
  27. Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B. M., & Rosenthal, R. (1981). Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 14 (pp. 1–59). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  28. Zuckerman, M., & Driver, R. E. (1985). Telling lies: Verbal and nonverbal correlates of deception. In A. W. Siegman & S. Feldstein (Eds.),Multichannel integrations of nonverbal behavior (pp. 129–147). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aldert Vrij
    • 1
  • Gün R. Semin
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of PortsmouthPortsmouthUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations