Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Drug tasting may confound human drug discrimination studies

Abstract

Unpublished observations suggested that some subjects in human drug discrimination studies acquired a drug versus placebo discrimination by tasting the capsule contents. To evaluate the prevalence of this behavior and to develop approaches to circumvent this problem, 30 normal human subjects participated in a drug discrimination study in which the study capsule (i.e., lactose and lactose + quinine) could be discriminated by tasting the capsule contents but were otherwise pharmacologically indistinguishable. Twenty percent of the subjects significantly discriminated between the capsules; this discrimination was disrupted by employing thorough mouth checks following capsule administration. Based on these findings, we recommend that human drug discrimination studies incorporate procedures that minimize the possibility of drug tasting by requiring consumption of sufficient fluid in combination with rigorous mouth checks to ensure capsule swallowing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Costa PT Jr, McCrae RR (1985) The NEO personality inventory manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, Fla.

  2. Evans SM, Griffiths RR (1991) Dose-related caffeine discrimination in normal volunteers: individual differences in subjective effects and self-reported cues. Behav Pharmacol 2:345–356

  3. Kamien JB, Bickel WK, Hughes JR, Higgins ST, Smith B (1993) Drug discrimination by humans compared to nonhumans: current status and future directions. Psychopharmacology 111:259–270

  4. Mumford GK, Evans SM, Kaminski BJ, Preston KL, Sannerud CA, Silverman K, Griffiths RR (1994) Discriminative stimulus and subjective effects of theobromine and caffeine in humans. Psychopharmacology 115:1–8

  5. Oliveto AH, Bickel WK, Hughes JR, Terry SY, Higgins ST, Badger GJ (1993) Pharmacological specificity of the caffeine discriminative stimulus in humans: effects of theophylline, methylphenidate and buspirone. Behav Pharmacol 4:237–246

  6. Preston KL, Bigelow GE (1991) Subjective and discriminative effects of drugs. Behav Pharmacol 2:293–313

  7. Silverman K, Griffiths RR (1992) Low-dose caffeine discrimination and self-reported mood effects in normal volunteers. J Exp Anal Behav 57:91–107

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to R. R. Griffiths.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abreu, M.E., Griffiths, R.R. Drug tasting may confound human drug discrimination studies. Psychopharmacology 125, 255–257 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02247336

Download citation

Key words

  • Drug discrimination
  • Compliance
  • Confound
  • Tasting
  • Quinine
  • Cheating
  • Humans