Footshock-induced freezing behavior in rats as a model for assessing anxiolytics
- 227 Downloads
A number of chemically distinct anxiolytics were examined for effects on defensive behavior (foot-shock-induced freezing) in rats. Central nervous system acting drugs which are not anxiolytics were also studied. Animals were injected with a drug or vehicle (IP) prior to being placed in a chamber with a grid floor through which two footshocks were delivered. Behavior was observed during the pre-shock period (2 min) and for 4 min after the second footshock. The effects of the following drugs on the duration of footshock-induced freezing were studied: diazepam (DZP); 2-amino-4,5-(1,2-cyclohexyl)-7 phosphonoheptonic acid (NPC 12626); 3-((+/−)-2-carboxypiperazine-4-yl)-propyl-1-phosphonic acid (CPP); [(+)-5-methyl-10-11,dihydroxy-5H-dibenzo(a,d)cyclohepten-5,10-imine (MK-801); buspirone hydrochloride (BUS);dl-amphetamine sulfate (AMP); haloperidol (HAL); ethyl-β-carboline-3 carboxylate (β-CCE). Compounds which reduced the duration of footshock-induced freezing included DZP, BUS, and the competitive NMDA antagonists NPC 12626 and CPP. The non-competitive NMDA antagonist, MK-801, had no effect on the response. The highest dose of amphetamine tested also reduced footshock-induced freezing. However, amphetamine-treated animals did not locomote or rear after footshock, suggesting fear of the environment. Animals injected with DZP, NPC 12626, CPP or buspirone spent at least 1.4 of the 4 post shock minutes locomoting. Haloperidol had no effect on freezing at the doses tested. β-CCE tended to increase the duration of footshock-induced freezing. With the exception of buspirone, none of the compounds which reduced freezing were analgesic in a hot plate test, suggesting that analgesia was not the cause of reduced freezing. Foot-shock-induced freezing is a simple test which may be useful for detecting the anxiolytic potential of drugs from a number of different classes.
Key wordsAnxiety model Defensive behavior Anxiolytic NPC 12626 Fear behavior
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Abbott A (1987) Can animal model really predict anxiety? TIPS 8:157–158Google Scholar
- Bolles RC (1970) Species-specific defensive reactions and avoidance learning. Psychol Rev 71:32–48Google Scholar
- Bouton ME, Bolles RC (1980) Conditioned fear assessed by freezing and by the suppression of three different baselines. Anim Learn Behav 8:429–434Google Scholar
- Conti L, Costello D, Loftus R., Martin L, White M, Abreu ME (1989) Effect of chronic CRF administration: behavioral, hormonal and receptor changes. Soc Neurosci Abstr 15:424.2Google Scholar
- Ferkany JW, Kyle DJ, Willetts J, Rzeszotarski WJ, Guzewska ME, Ellenberger SR, Jones SM, Sacaan AI, Snell LD, Borosky S, Jones BE, Johnson KM, Balster RL, Burchette K, Kawaski K, Hock DB, Dingledine R (1989) Pharmacological profile of NPC 12626, a novel, competitive antagonist for NMDA receptors. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 250:100–107PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ferkany JW, Kyle DJ, Ellenberger WP, Narayanan BA, Hudkins R, Rzeszotarski WJ, Conti L, Enna SJ (1990) Pharmacological profile of novel cyclic analogs of 2-amino-7-phosphonoheptanoic acid. WONIEP VI PROCEEDINGS (in press)Google Scholar
- Ives JL, Heym J (1989) Antidepressant agents. In: Berger Annual reports in medicinal chemistry. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar