Psychopharmacology

, Volume 110, Issue 1–2, pp 5–12 | Cite as

Autoshaping i.v. cocaine self-administration in rats: effects of nondrug alternative reinforcers on acquisition

  • Marilyn E. Carroll
  • Sylvie T. Lac
Original Investigations

Abstract

The purpose of this experiment was to examine the effects of a nondrug alternative reinforcer and feeding conditions on the acquisition of cocaine self-administration. Rats were autoshaped to press a lever that resulted in a 0.2 mg/kg IV cocaine infusion. Responses on the lever were monitored during six consecutive autoshaping sessions that occurred each day. A retractable lever was inserted into the operant chamber on a random time 60 s schedule 10 times per session for six sessions that began each hour. Each day the six autoshaping sessions were followed by a 6-h cocaine self-administration session. During self-administration the lever remained extended, and each response on the lever resulted in a cocaine infusion (0.2 mg/kg). The criterion for acquisition of cocaine-reinforced behavior was met when there were 5 consecutive days during which the mean number of infusions during the 6-h self-administration session was at least 100. This procedure was repeated daily until the criterion was met or 30 days elapsed. The rats were also trained to respond on lick-operated automatic drinking devices that delivered 0.05 ml water or a glucose and saccharin solution (G+S) contingent upon each lick response. Five groups of 12–14 rats were compared. The first four groups constituted a 2 × 2 factorial design whereby either G+S or water was available in the home cage for 3 weeks before autoshaping began and G+S or water was available in the operant chamber during autoshaping. These groups were limited to 20 g food per day and all had free access to water. A fifth group had only water available in the home cage and operant chamber, and they had unlimited access to food but no G+S. The results indicated that access to the G+S solution in the operant chamber substantially delayed autoshaping, and a large percentage of these rats did not meet the autoshaping criterion within 30 days. The data from groups that had G+S in the home cage were very similar to those that had only water in the home cage; thus, a history of access to G+S did not interfere with acquisition of cocaine self-administration. Autoshaping in the group that had free access to food was highly variable, but a high positive correlation was found between the amount of food consumed and the number of days taken to meet the acquisition criterion. When the rats from the group that consumed over 20 g were compared to the rats in another group that were limited to 20 g and had no G+S, it was found that the increased food intake markedly decreased the rate of acquisition of cocaine self-administration. These findings indicate that acquisition of cocaine-reinforced behavior is delayed or prevented in environments enriched with nondrug alternative reinforcers such as food and a preferred liquid.

Key words

Acquisition Autoshaping Cocaine Drinking behavior Food deprivation Glucose and saccharin (G+S) Intravenous Rats Self administration 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beardsley PM, Meisch RA (1981) A precision drinking device for rats tested with water, etonitazene, and ethanol. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 14:871–876Google Scholar
  2. Brown PL, Jenkins HM (1968) Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck. J Exp Anal Behav 11:1–8Google Scholar
  3. Carroll ME (1985a) Concurrent phencyclidine and saccharin access: presentation of an alternative reinforcer reduced drug intake. J Exp Anal Behav 43:131–144Google Scholar
  4. Carroll ME (1985b) The role of food deprivation in the maintenance and reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior in rats. Drug Alcohol Depend 16:95–109Google Scholar
  5. Carroll ME, Boe IN (1982) Increased intravenous drug self-administration during deprivation of other reinforcers. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 17:563–567Google Scholar
  6. Carroll ME, Carmona G (1991) Effects of food FR and food deprivation on disruption in food-maintained performance of monkeys during phencyclidine withdrawal Psychopharmacology 104:143–149Google Scholar
  7. Carroll ME, Meisch RA (1984) Increased drug-reinforced behavior due to food deprivation. In: Thompson T, Dews PB, Barrett JE (eds) Advances in behavioral pharmacology, vol IV. Academic Press, New York, pp 47–88Google Scholar
  8. Carroll ME, Santi PA, Rudell RL (1981) A microcomputer system for the control of behavioral experiments. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 14:415–417Google Scholar
  9. Carroll ME, Lac ST, Nygaard SL (1989) A concurrently available nondrug reinforcer prevents the acquisition or decreases the maintenance of cocaine-reinforced behavior. Psychopharmacology 97:23–29Google Scholar
  10. Carroll ME, Lac ST, Asencio M, Kragh R (1990) Fluoxetine reduces intravenous cocaine self-administration in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 35:237–244Google Scholar
  11. Carroll ME, Carmona GG, May SA (1991) Modifying drug-reinforced behavior by altering the economic conditions of the drug and a nondrug reinforcer. J Exp Anal Behav 56:361–376Google Scholar
  12. Cox DR, Oakes D (1984) Analysis of survival data. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. De Vry J, Donselaar I, Van Ree JM (1989) Food deprivation and acquisition of intravenous cocaine self-administration in rats: effect of naltrexone and haloperidol. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 251:735–740Google Scholar
  14. Horger BA, Wellman PJ, Morien A, Davies BT, Schenk S (1991) Caffeine exposure sensitizes rats to the reinforcing effects of cocaine. Neuro Report 2:53–56Google Scholar
  15. Johanson CE, Balster RL (1978) A summary of the results of a drug self-administration study using substitution procedures in rhesus monkeys. Bull Narc 30:43–54Google Scholar
  16. Messing RB, Kleven MS, Sparber SB (1986) Delaying reinforcement in an autoshaping task generates adjunctive and superstitious behaviors. Behav Proc 13:327–339Google Scholar
  17. Piazza PV, Deminiere JM, Le Moal M, Simon H (1989) Factors that predict individual vulnerability to amphetamine self-administration. Science 245:1511–1513Google Scholar
  18. Piazza PV, Deminiere JM, Le Moal M, Simon H (1990) Stress-and pharmacologically-induced behavioral sensitization increases vulnerability to acquisition of amphetamine self-administration. Brain Res 514:22–26Google Scholar
  19. Ramsey NF (1991) Cocaine dependence: Factors in the initiation of self-administration in rats. Thesis published by Rudolph Magnus Institute, University of Utrecht, the Netherlands, pp 137–148Google Scholar
  20. Ramsey NF, Van Ree JM (1990) Chronic pretreatment with naltrexone facilitates acquisition of intravenous cocaine self-administration in rats. Eur Neuropsychopharm 1:55–61Google Scholar
  21. Smith JC, Foster DF (1980) Some determinants of intake of glucose and saccharin solutions. Physiol Behav 25:127–133Google Scholar
  22. Smith JC, Williams DP, Jue SS (1976) Rapid oral mixing of glucose and saccharin by rats. Science 191:304–305Google Scholar
  23. Sparber SB, Bollweg GL, Messing RB (1991) Food deprivation enhances both autoshaping and autoshaping by a latent inhibition procedure. Behav Proc 23:59–74Google Scholar
  24. Thompson T, Pickens R (1970) Stimulant self-administration by animals: some comparisons with opiate self-administration. Fed Proc 29:6–12Google Scholar
  25. Valenstein ES, Cox VC, Kakolewski JW (1967) Polydipsia elicited by the synergistic action of a saccharin and glucose solution. Science 157:552–554Google Scholar
  26. Weeks JR (1972) Long term intravenous infusion. In: Myers RD (ed) Methods in psychobiology, vol 2. Academic Press, London, pp 166–168Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marilyn E. Carroll
    • 1
  • Sylvie T. Lac
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of Minnesota Medical SchoolMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations