, Volume 120, Issue 1, pp 10–20 | Cite as

Fluctuations in nucleus accumbens dopamine concentration during intravenous cocaine self-administration in rats

  • R. A. Wise
  • K. Leeb
  • D. Pocock
  • P. Newton
  • B. Burnette
  • J. B. JusticeJr
Original Investigation


Fluctuations in extracellular dopamine and DOPAC levels in nucleus accumbens septi (NAS) were monitored in 1-min microdialysis samples taken from rats engaged in intravenous cocaine self-administration. For four rats the dose per injection was fixed at 2.0 mg/kg; for four others the dose per injection was varied irregularly, from one response to the next, between three levels (0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 mg/kg). Regardless of the dosing regimen, extracellular dopamine levels were tonically elevated by 200–800% within the cocaine self-administration periods, fluctuating phasically within this range between responses. In the fixed dose condition, the phasic increases following each injection (and the phasic decreases preceding them) averaged approximately 50% of the mean tonic elevation. Phasic fluctuations in dopamine levels remained time-locked to lever-presses even when response rate was irregular, because of the variable dose condition. In the variable dose condition greater increases in dopamine and longer inter-response times followed injections of the higher doses; dopamine fluctuations were consistent with the multiple-infusion pharmacokinetics of cocaine. DOPAC levels showed a slow tonic depression during cocaine self-administration, but individual injections were not associated with discernible phasic fluctuations of DOPAC. These data are consistent with the hypothesis that falling dopamine levels trigger successive responses in the intravenous cocaine self-administration paradigm, but inconsistent with the notion that extracellular dopamine levels are depleted at the times within sessions when the animal initiates drug-seeking responses.

Key words

Cocaine Self-administration Dopamine Microdialysis 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Apicella P, Scarnati E, Ljungberg T, Schultz W (1992) Neuronal activity in monkey striatum related to the expectation of predictable environmental events. J Neurophysiol 68:945–960Google Scholar
  2. Baxter BL, Gluckman MI, Stein L, Scerni RA (1974) Self-injection of apomorphine in the rat: positive reinforcement by a dopamine receptor stimulant. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2:387–391Google Scholar
  3. Bozarth MA, Wise RA (1985) Toxicity associated with long-term intravenous heroin and cocaine self-administration in the rat. JAMA 254:81–83Google Scholar
  4. Carder B, Berkowitz K (1970) Rats' preference for earned in comparison with free food. Science 167:1273–1274Google Scholar
  5. Carelli RM, King VC, Hampson RE, Deadwyler SA (1993) Firing patterns of nucleus accumbens neurons during cocaine self-administration in rats. Brain Res 626:14–22Google Scholar
  6. Carlsson A (1993) On the neuronal circuitries and neurotransmitters involved in the control of locomotor activity. J Neural Transm Suppl 40:1–12Google Scholar
  7. Chang JY, Sawyer SF, Lee RS, Woodward DJ (1994) Electrophysiological and pharmacological evidence for the role of the nucleus accumbens in cocaine self-administration in freely moving rats. J Neurosci 14:1224–1244Google Scholar
  8. Church WH, Justice JB, Byrd LD (1987) Extracellular dopamine in rat striatum following uptake inhibition by cocaine, nomifensine and benztropine. Eur J Pharmacol 139:345–348Google Scholar
  9. Dackis CA, Gold MS (1985) New concepts in cocaine addiction: the dopamine depletion hypothesis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 9:469–477Google Scholar
  10. Devine DP, Leone, P, Wise, RA (1993) Surgical preparation of striatal tissue facilitates early sampling in microdialysis and reveals an index of neuronal damage. J Neurochem 61:1246–1254Google Scholar
  11. de Wit H, Wise RA (1977) Blockade of cocaine reinforcement in rats with the dopamine receptor blocker pimozide but not with the noradrenergic blockers phentolamine or phenoxybenzamine. Can J Psychol 31:195–203Google Scholar
  12. Di Chiara G, Imperato A (1988) Drugs of abuse preferentially stimulate dopamine release in the mesolimbic system of freely moving rats. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:5274–5278Google Scholar
  13. Ettenberg A, Laferriere A, Milner PM, White N (1981) Response involvement in brain stimulation reward. Physiol Behav 27:641–647Google Scholar
  14. Gerber GJ, Wise RA (1989) Pharmacological regulation of intravenous cocaine and heroin self-administration in rats: a variable dose paradigm. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 32:527–531Google Scholar
  15. Gonon F, Buda M, Cespuglio R, Jouvet M, Pujol JF (1980) In vivo electrochemical detection of catechols in the neostriatum of anaesthetized rats: dopamine or DOPAC? Nature 286:902–904Google Scholar
  16. Gratton A, Wise RA (1994) Drug- and behavior-associated changes in dopamine-related electrochemical signals during intravenous cocaine self-administration in rats. J Neurosci (in press)Google Scholar
  17. Gratton A, Wise RA, Kiyatkin EA (1992) Chronoamperometric measurements of dopamine levels in rat nucleus accumbens during cocaine self-administration. Soc Neurosci Abstr 18:1076Google Scholar
  18. Heikkila RE, Orlansky H, Cohen G (1975) Studies on the distinction between uptake inhibition and release of (3H) dopamine in rat brain tissue slices. Biochem Pharmacol 24:847–852Google Scholar
  19. Heimer L, Zahm DS, Churchill L, Kalivas PW, Wohltmann C (1991) Specificity in the projection patterns of the accumbal core and shell in the rat. Neuroscience 41:89–125Google Scholar
  20. Hurd YL, Kehr J, Ungerstedt U (1988) In vivo microdialysis as a technique to monitor drug transport: correlation of extracellular cocaine levels and dopamine overflow in the rat brain. J Neurochem 51:1314–1316Google Scholar
  21. Hurd JL, Weiss F, Koob GF, Anden N-E, Ungerstedt U (1989) Cocaine reinforcement and extracellular dopamine overflow in rat nucleus accumbens: an in vivo microdialysis study. Brain Res 498:199–203Google Scholar
  22. Hurd YL, Weiss F, Koob GF, Ungerstedt U (1990) The influence of cocaine self-administration on in vivo dopamine and acetylcholine neurotransmission in rat caudate-putamen. Neurosci Lett 109:227–233Google Scholar
  23. Iglauer C, Llewellyn ME, Woods JH (1976) Concurrent schedules of cocaine injection in rhesus monkeys: dose variations under independent and non-independent variable-interval procedures. Pharmacol Rev 27:367–383Google Scholar
  24. Johanson CE, Balster RL, Bonese K (1976) Self-administration of psychomotor stimulant drugs: the effects of unlimited access. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 4:45–51Google Scholar
  25. Kalivas PW, Duffy P (1990) Effect of acute and daily cocaine treatment on extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens. Synapse 5:48–58Google Scholar
  26. Kiyatkin EA, Stein EA (1993) Behavior-associated changes in blood pressure during heroin self-administration. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 46:561–567Google Scholar
  27. Kiyatkin EA, Stein EA (1994) Biphasic changes in mesolimbic dopamine signal during cocaine self-administration. Neuro Report 5:1005–1008Google Scholar
  28. Kiyatkin EA, Wise RA, Gratton A (1993) Drug- and behavior-associated changes in dopamine-related electrochemical signals during intravenous heroin self-administration in rats. Synapse 14:60–72Google Scholar
  29. Koob GF, Stinus L, Le Moal M, Bloom FE (1989) Opponent process theory of motivation: neurobiological evidence from studies of opiate dependence. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 3:135–140Google Scholar
  30. Lyness WH, Friedle NM, Moore KE (1979) Destruction of dopaminergic nerve terminals in nucleus accumbens: effect ond-amphetamine self-administration. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 11:553–556Google Scholar
  31. Lyness WH, Friedle NM, Moore KE (1981) Increased self-administration ofd-amphetamine after destruction of 5-hydroxytryptaminergic nerves. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 12:937–941Google Scholar
  32. Mark GP, Smith SE, Rada PV, Hoebel BG (1994) An appetitively conditioned taste elicits a preferential increase in mesolimbic dopamine release. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 48:651–660Google Scholar
  33. Mitchell JB, Gratton A (1991) Opioid modulation and sensitization of dopamine release elicited by sexually relevant stimuli: a high-speed chronoamperometric study in freely moving rats. 551:20–27Google Scholar
  34. Newton AP, Justice JB (1994) Microdialysis with one minute sampling intervals: following rapid changes of extracellular dopamine. Anal Chem (in press)Google Scholar
  35. Pan H-T, Menacherry S, Justice JB (1991) Differences in the pharmacokinetics of cocaine in naive and cocaine-experienced rats. J Neurochem 56:1299–1306Google Scholar
  36. Parsons LH, Koob GF, Weiss F (1993) Extracellular serotonin and dopamine in the nucleus accumbens following unlimited-access to cocaine self-administration. Soc Neurosci Abstr 19:1856Google Scholar
  37. Pettit HO, Justice JB (1989) Dopamine in the nucleus accumbens during cocaine self-administration as studied by in vivo microdialysis. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 34:899–904Google Scholar
  38. Pettit HO, Justice JB (1991) Effect of dose on cocaine self-administration behavior and dopamine levels in the nucleus accumbens. Brain Res 539:94–102Google Scholar
  39. Pfaus JG, Damsma G, Nomikos GG, Wenkstern DG, Blaha CD, Phillips AG, Fibiger HC (1990) Sexual behavior enhances central dopamine transmission in the male rat. Brain Res 530:345–348Google Scholar
  40. Pickens R, Harris WC (1968) Self-administration ofd-amphetamine by rats. Psychopharmacology 12:158–163Google Scholar
  41. Pickens R, Thompson T (1968) Cocaine-reinforced behavior in rats: effects of reinforcement magnitude and fixed-ratio size. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 161:122–129Google Scholar
  42. Porrino LJ, Esposito RU, Seeger TF, Crane AM, Pert A, Sokoloff L (1984) Metabolic mapping of the brain during rewarding self-stimulation. Science 224:306–309Google Scholar
  43. Risner ME, Jones BE (1976) Role of noradrenergic and dopaminergic processes in amphetamine self-administration. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 5:477–482Google Scholar
  44. Risner ME, Jones BE (1980) Intravenous self-administration of cocaine and norcocaine by dogs. Psychopharmacology 71:83–89Google Scholar
  45. Roberts DCS, Corcoran ME, Fibiger HC (1977) On the role of ascending catecholaminergic systems in intravenous self-administration of cocaine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 6:615–620Google Scholar
  46. Roberts DCS, Koob GF, Klonoff P, Fibiger HC (1980) Extinction and recovery of cocaine self-administration following 6-OHDA lesions of the nucleus accumbens. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 12:781–787Google Scholar
  47. Schwartz JC, Diaz J, Griffon N, Levesque D, Martres MP, Sokoloff P (1994) Multiple dopamine receptors: the D3 receptor and actions of substances of abuse. Experientia 71:81–92Google Scholar
  48. Smith JE, Co C, Freeman ME, Lane JD (1982) Brain neurotransmitter turnover correlated with morphine-seeking behavior in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 16:509–519Google Scholar
  49. Sokoloff P, Giros B, Martres MP, Andrieux M, Besancon R, Pilon C, Bouthenet ML, Souil E, Schwartz JC (1992) Localization and function of the D3 dopamine receptor. Arzneimittelforschung 42[2A]:224–230Google Scholar
  50. Solomon RL, Corbit JD (1974) An opponent-process theory of motivation: I. Temporal dynamics of affect. Psychol Rev 81:119–145Google Scholar
  51. Swanson LW (1992) Brain maps: structure of the rat brain. Elsevier, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  52. Voorn P, Gerfen CR, Groenewegen HJ (1989) Compartmental organization of the ventral striatum of the rat; immunohistochemical distribution of enkephalin, substance P, dopamine, and calcium binding protein. J Comp Neurol 289:189–201Google Scholar
  53. Weiss F, Hurd YL, Ungerstedt U, Markou A, Plotsky PM, Koob GF (1992) Neurochemical correlates of cocaine and ethanol self-administration. Ann NY Acad Sci 654:220–241Google Scholar
  54. Wilson MC, Schuster CR (1972) The effects of chlorpromazine on psychomotor stimulant self-administration in the rhesus monkey. Psychopharmacologia 26:115–126Google Scholar
  55. Wise RA (1987) Intravenous drug self-administration: a special case of positive reinforcement. In: Bozarth MA (ed) Methods of assessing the reinforcing properties of abused drugs. Springer, New York, pp 117–141Google Scholar
  56. Wise RA, Yokel RA, Hansson P, Gerber GJ (1977) Concurrent intracranial self-stimulation and amphetamine self-administration in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 7:459–461Google Scholar
  57. Woolverton WL, Goldberg LI, Ginos J (1984) Intravenous self-administration of dopamine receptor agonists by rhesus monkeys. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 230:678–683Google Scholar
  58. Yokel RA (1987) Intravenous self-administration: response rates, the effects of pharmacological challenges, and drug preferences. In: Bozarth MA (ed) Methods of assessing the reinforcing properties of abused drugs. Springer, New York, pp 1–33Google Scholar
  59. Yokel RA, Pickens R (1973) Self-administration of optical isomers of amphetamine and methylamphetamine by rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 187:27–33Google Scholar
  60. Yokel RA, Pickens R (1974) Drug level ofd- andl-amphetamine during intravenous self-administration. Psychopharmacology 34:255–264Google Scholar
  61. Yokel RA, Wise RA (1975) Increased lever-pressing for amphetamine after pimozide in rats: implications for a dopamine theory of reward. Science 187:547–549Google Scholar
  62. Yokel RA, Wise RA (1976) Attenuation of intravenous amphetamine reinforcement by central dopamine blockade in rats. Psychopharmacology 48:311–318Google Scholar
  63. Yokel RA, Wise RA (1978) Amphetamine-type reinforcement by dopaminergic agonists in the rat. Psychopharmacology 58:289–296Google Scholar
  64. Zetterström T, Herrera-Marschitz U, Ungerstedt U (1981) Simultaneous estimation of dopamine release and rotational behaviour induced byd-amphetamine in 6-OH-DA denervated rats. Neurosci Lett Suppl 7:27–32Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. A. Wise
    • 1
    • 2
  • K. Leeb
    • 1
    • 2
  • D. Pocock
    • 1
  • P. Newton
    • 3
  • B. Burnette
    • 3
  • J. B. JusticeJr
    • 3
  1. 1.Center for Studies in Behavioral NeurobiologyConcordia UniversityMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyConcordia UniversityMontrealCanada
  3. 3.Department of ChemistryEmory UniversityAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations