Behavioural analysis of the anorectic effects of fluoxetine and fenfluramine
- 29 Downloads
- 28 Citations
Abstract
Two sets of experiments were carried out to compare the effects of fenfluramine and fluoxetine on consummatory and operant behaviour. In food-deprived rats allowed access to a 35% sucrose solution, an initial period of sucrose consumption was followed by a short period of grooming and exploratory behaviour, later superceded by resting. This “behavioural satiety sequence” was advanced by fluoxetine, but disrupted bydl-fenfluramine, which suppressed post-prandial resting, even at sub-anorectic doses. Fluoxetine also elicited resting behaviour following water drinking. However, this did not appear to be a non-specific sedative effect, since fluoxetine increased post-prandial grooming. In rats performing on random interval schedules of food reinforcement, fluoxetine caused proportionally greater decreases in responding on a reinforcement-lean schedule (RI-300s), as compared to a reinforcement-rich schedule (RI-7.5s); this effect is similar to that of a reduction in level of food deprivation. By contrast, fenfluramine reduced responding equally on both schedules. In both paradigms, the effects of fluoxetine were compatible with an increase in postprandial satiety, but the effects of fenfluramine were not.
Key words
Feeding Fluoxetine Fenfluramine Behavioural satiety sequence Post-prandial resting Matching law Random interval reinforcement schedules RatPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Antin J, Gibbs J, Young RC, Smith GP (1975) Cholecystokinin elicits the complete behavioural sequence of satiety in rats. Physiol Psychol 89:784–790Google Scholar
- Booth DA, Gibson EL, Baker BJ (1986) Gastromotor mechanism of fenfluramine anorexia. Appetite [Suppl] 7:57–69Google Scholar
- Blundell JE, (1986) Serotonin manipulations and the structure of feeding behaviour. Appetite [Suppl] 7:39–56Google Scholar
- Blundell JE, Hill AJ (1987) Nutrition, serotonin and appetite: case study in the evolution of a scientific idea. Appetite 8:183–194Google Scholar
- Blundell JE, Latham CJ (1980) Behavioural pharmacology of feeding. In: Silverstone T (ed) Drugs and appetite. Academic Press, London, pp 41–80Google Scholar
- Blundell JE, McArthur RA (1978) Behavioural flux and feeding: continuous monitoring of food intake and food selection, and the video recording of appetitive and satiety sequences for the analysis of drug action. In: Garattini S, Samanin R (eds) Anorectic agents: mechanism of action and tolerance. Raven Press, New York, pp 19–43Google Scholar
- Clifton PG, Barnfield AMC, Philcox L (1989) A behavioural profile of fluoxetine-induced anorexia. Psychopharmacology 97:89–95Google Scholar
- Davison M, McCarthy D (1988) The matching law: a research review. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New YerseyGoogle Scholar
- Fuller RW, Wong DT (1977) Inhibition of serotonin uptake. Fed Proc 36:2154–2158Google Scholar
- Garattini S, Mennini T, Bendotti C, Invernizzi R, Samanin R (1986) Neurochemical mechanism of action of drugs which modify feeding via the serotonergic system. Appetite [Suppl] 7:15–38Google Scholar
- Goudie AJ, Thornton EW, Wheeler TJ (1976) Effect of Lilly 110140, a specific inhibitor of 5-hydroxytryptamine uptake on food intake and on 5-hydroxytryptophan-induced anorexia. J Pharm Pharmacol 28:318–320Google Scholar
- Heyman GM, Monaghan MM (1987) Interpretations of the matching law: new data, methodological issues and literature. J Exp Psychol [Anim Behav Proc] 13:384–394Google Scholar
- Kushner LR, Mook DG (1984) Behavioural correlates of oral and post-ingestive satiety in the rat. Physiol Behav 33:713–718Google Scholar
- Montgomery AMJ, Willner P (1988) Fenfluramine disrupts the behavioural satiety sequence in rats. Psychopharmacology 94:397–401Google Scholar
- Morley MJ, Bradshaw CM, Szabadi E (1984) The effects of pimozide on variable interval performance: a test of the anhedonia hypothesis of the mode of action of neuroleptics. Psychopharmacology 84:531–536Google Scholar
- Morley MJ, Bradshaw CM, Szabadi E (1985) The effect ofd-amphetamine on operant behaviour maintained under variableinterval schedules of reinforcement. Psychopharmacology 87:207–211Google Scholar
- Pinder RM, Brogden RN, Gawyer RR, Speight TM, Avery GS (1975) Fenfluramine: a review of its pharmacological properties and its therapeutic efficacy in obesity. Drugs 10:241–323Google Scholar
- Ruddle HV, Morley MJ, Bradshaw CM, Szabadi E (1984) The effect of pentobarbitone on variable interval performance: analysis in terms of Herrnstein's equation. Psychopharmacology 84:520–525Google Scholar
- Smith GP, Gibbs J (1975) Postprandial satiety. In: Sprague JM, Epstein AN (eds) Progress in psychobiology and physiological psychology, vol. 8. Academic Press, New York, pp 180–242Google Scholar
- Willner P, Towell A, Muscat R (1987) Effects of amphetamine and pimozide on reinforcement and motor parameters in variableinterval performance. J Psychopharmacol 1:140–153Google Scholar
- Willner P, Sampson D, Phillips G, Muscat R (1989) A matching law analysis of the effects of dopamine receptor antagonists. Psychoipharmacology 101:560–567Google Scholar