Advertisement

Psychopharmacology

, Volume 107, Issue 2–3, pp 211–216 | Cite as

Behavioral economics of drug self-administration

IV. The effects of response requirement on the consumption of and interaction between concurrently available coffee and cigarettes
  • Warren K. Bickel
  • John R. Hughes
  • R. J. De Grandpre
  • Stephen T. Higgins
  • Pamela Rizzuto
Original Investigations

Abstract

In behavioral economics, consumption of a reinforcer is determined by its price and by the price of other available reinforcers. This study examined the effects of price manipulations on the consumption of concurrently available coffee and cigarettes. During fifteen 4-h sessions, coffee and cigarettes were concurrently available according to fixed-ratio (FR) schedules of reinforcement. After consumption stabilized under a fixed ratio 100 for both reinforcers, the response requirement for each reinforcer was varied separately (i.e., FR 100, 1000 and 2500), while the response requirement for the other reinforcer was kept at 100. Increasing the FR value decreased coffee and cigarette consumption to a similar degree. Also, as the price for cigarettes increased (and consumption decreased), coffee consumption decreased; however, as the price of coffee increased, cigarette consumption did not change. These results indicate that for this setting the reinforcing effects of cigarettes and coffee were comparable but interacted asymmetrically. These findings when analyzed and quantified via economic concepts of own-price and cross-price elasticity illustrate the viability of using behavioral economics to examine drug self-administration in a choice paradigm.

Key words

Behavioral economics Drug self-administration Reinforcer interactions Concurrent reinforcers Cigarette smoking Coffee drinking Humans 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allison J (1979) Demand economics and experimental psychology. Behav Sci 24:403–415Google Scholar
  2. Benowitz NL, Hall SM, Gunnard M (1989) Persistent increases in caffeine concentrations in people who stop smoking. BMJ 298:1075–1076PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bickel WK, DeGrandpre RJ, Higgins ST, Hughes JR (1990) Behavioral economics of drug self-administration. I. Functional equivalence of response requirement and drug dose. Life Sci 47:1501–1510CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bickel WK, DeGrandpre RJ, Hughes JR, Higgins ST (1991) Behavioral economics of drug self-administration. II. A unit-price analysis of cigarette smoking. J Exp Anal Behav 55:145–154Google Scholar
  5. Brown CR, Jacob III P, Wilson M, Benowitz NL (1988) Changes in rate and pattern of caffeine metabolism after cigarette abstinence. Clin Pharmacol Ther 43:488–491PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Carroll ME (1985) Concurrent phencyclidine and saccharin access: presentation of an alternative reinforcer reduces drug intake. J Exp Anal Behav 43:131–144PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Carroll ME (1987) Self-administration of orally delivered phencyclidine and ethanol concurrent fixed-ratio schedules in rhesus monkeys. Psychopharmacology 93:1–7Google Scholar
  8. Chait LD, Griffiths RR (1983) Effects of caffeine on cigarette smoking and subjective responses. Clin Pharmacol Ther 34:612–622PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Goldberg SR, Hoffeister F, Shlichting UU, Wuttke W (1971) A comparison of pentobarbital and cocaine self-administration in rhesus monkeys: Effect of dose and fixed-ratio parameter. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 179:277–283PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Griffiths RR, Woodson PP (1988) Reinforcing properties of caffeine: Studies in humans and laboratory animals. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 29:419–427Google Scholar
  11. Griffiths RR, Bigelow GE, Henningfield JE (1980) Similarities in animal and human drug-taking behavior. In: Mello MK (ed) Advances in substance abuse, vol 1. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp 1–90Google Scholar
  12. Griffiths RR, Bigelow GE, Liebson I (1976) Facilitation of human tobacco self-administration by ethanol: a behavioral analysis. J Exp Anal Behav 25:279–292PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Griffiths RR, Henningfield JE, Bigelow GE (1982) Human cigarette smoking: manipulation of number of puffs per bout, interbout interval and nicotine dose. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 220:256–265PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Griffiths RR, Bigelow GE, Liebson IA (1989) Reinforcing effect of caffeine in coffee and capsules. J Exp Anal Behav 52:127–140PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Henningfield JE, Goldberg SR (1983) Nicotine as a reinforcer in human subjects and laboratory animals. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 19:989–992CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Henningfield JE, Griffiths RR (1981) Cigarette smoking and subjective response: effects ofd-amphetamine. Clin Pharmacol Ther 30:497–505PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Higgins ST, Delaney DD, Budney AJ, Bickel WK, Hughes J, Foerg F, Fenwick J (1991) A pilot study of a behavioral approach to achieving initial abstinance from cocaine. Am J Psychiatry (in press)Google Scholar
  18. Hughes JR, Higgins ST, Bickel WK (1988) On the use of the term “property” to refer to the behavioral effects of drugs. Psychopharmacology 96:557Google Scholar
  19. Hursh SR (1980) Economic concepts for the analysis of behavior. J Exp Anal Behav 34:219–238Google Scholar
  20. Hursh SR (1984) Behavioral economics. J Exp Anal Behav 42:435–452Google Scholar
  21. Hursh SR, Bauman RA (1987) The behavioral analysis of demand. In: Green L, Kagel JH (eds) Advances in behavioral economics, vol 1. Ablex, Norwood, NJ, pp 117–165Google Scholar
  22. Hursh SR, Raslear TG, Shurtleff D, Bauman R, Simmons L (1988) A cost-benefit analysis of demand for food. J Exp Anal Behav 50:419–440Google Scholar
  23. Istvan J, Matarazzo JD (1984) Tobacco, alcohol, and caffeine use: a review of their interrelationships. Psychol Bull 95:301–326CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mansfield E (1988) Microeconomics: theory/applications, 6th edn. W. W. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Marshall WR, Epstein LH, Green SB (1980) Coffee and cigarette smoking: 1. Coffee, caffeine and cigarette smoking behavior. Addict Behav 5:389–394Google Scholar
  26. Nellis MJ, Emurian HH, Brady JV, Ray RL (1982) Behavior analysis of cigarette smoking. Pav J Biol Sci 17:140–149Google Scholar
  27. Ossip DJ, Epstein LH (1981) Relative effects of nicotine and coffee on cigarette smoking. Addict Behav 6:35–39Google Scholar
  28. Samson HH, Lindberg K (1984) Comparison of sucrose-sucrose to sucrose-ethanol concurrent responding in the rat: reinforcement schedule and fluid concentration effects. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 20:973–977Google Scholar
  29. Samuelson PA, Nordhaus WD (1985) Economics, 12th edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Schuster CR (1986) Implications of laboratory research for the treatment of drug dependence. In: Goldberg SR, Stolerman IP (eds) Behavioral analysis of drug dependence Academic Press, New York, pp 357–385Google Scholar
  31. Vuchinich RE, Tucker JA (1988) Contributions from behavioral theories of choice as a framework to an analysis of alcohol abuse. J Abnorm Psychol 92:408–416Google Scholar
  32. Young AM, Herling S (1986) Drugs as reinforcers: studies in laboratory animals. In: Goldberg SR, Herling IP (eds) Behavioral analysis of drug dependence. Academic Press, Orlando, FL, pp 9–67Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Warren K. Bickel
    • 1
  • John R. Hughes
    • 1
  • R. J. De Grandpre
    • 1
  • Stephen T. Higgins
    • 1
  • Pamela Rizzuto
    • 1
  1. 1.University of VermontBurlingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations