, Volume 112, Issue 4, pp 503–510

Voluntary consumption of ethanol in 15 inbred mouse strains

  • J. K. Belknap
  • J. C. Crabbe
  • E. R. Young
Original Investigations


To determine genetic differences in ethanol consumption, 15 commonly used inbred strains of mice were given ad libitum two-bottle choice between ethanol, 0.2% saccharin, or ethanol plus saccharin in one bottle versus tap water in the other bottle. Three different concentrations of ethanol were used: 3%, 6% and 10% (v/v). Of the 15 strains, the C57BL/6J, C57BR/cdJ and C57L/J strains showed the most consistent higher intake of ethanol either with or without 0.2% saccharin. In marked contrast, the DBA/1J and DBA/2J strains consistently showed the lowest intake. Consumption of 3% ethanol without saccharin was highly genetically correlated with saccharin consumption (r=0.77), suggesting that low concentrations of ethanol may have a sweet taste that affects voluntary consumption. Most strains showed very different patterns of response to ethanol with or without saccharin. Three patterns of strain responses were identified. Some strains avoided higher concentrations of ethanol whether in water or saccharin; some appeared to be sensitive to the ability of saccharin to mask the odor of ethanol; and some may have reduced consumption only when ethanol concentrations were high enough to produce aversive postingestional effects. Whereas earlier studies generally attempted to explain strain differences in consumption by invoking a single mechanism, our results demonstrate that more than one mechanism is necessary to explain the preferential ethanol intake of all strains studied.

Key words

Ethanol Self-administration Alcohol preference Pharmacogenetics Strain differences Inbred strains 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Belknap JK, Deutsch CK (1982) Differential neurosensitivity to three alcohols and phenobarbital in C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice. Behav Genet 12:309–317CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Belknap JK, Belknap ND, Berg J, Coleman RR (1977) Preabsorptive vs. postabsorptive control of ethanol intake in C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice. Behav Genet 7:413–425CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Belknap JK, Coleman RR, Foster K (1978) Alcohol consumption and sensory threshold differences between C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice. Physiol Psychol 6:71–74Google Scholar
  4. Belknap JK, Crabbe JC, Plomin R, McClearn GE, Sampson KE, O'Toole LA, Gora-Maslak G (1992) Single locus control of saccharin intake in BXD/Ty recombinant inbred mice: some methodological implications for RI strain analysis. Behav Genet 22:81–100CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Crabbe JC, Belknap JK (1992) Genetic approaches to drug dependence. TIPS 13:212–219PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Crabbe JC, Janowsky JS, Young ER, Kosobud A, Stack J, Rigter H (1982) Tolerance to ethanol hypothermia in inbred mice: genotypic correlations with behavioral responses Alcohol Clin Exp Res 6:446–458PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Crabbe JC, Phillips TJ, Kosobud A, Belknap JK (1990) Estimation of genetic correlation: interpretation of experiments using selectively bred and inbred animals. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 14:141–151PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Falconer DS (1981) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 3rd edition, Longmans, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Festing MFW (1989) Inbred strains of mice. In: Lyon MF, Searle AG (eds) Genetic variants and strains of the laboratory mouse. Oxford Press, Oxford, pp 636–648Google Scholar
  10. Fuller JL (1964) Measurement of alcohol preference in genetic experiments. J Comp Physiol Psychol 57:85–88PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fuller JL (1974) Single locus control of saccharin preference in mice. J Hered 65:33–36PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Gentry RT (1985) Voluntary consumption of ethanol and its consequences in C57 mice treated with 4-methylpyrazole. Alcohol 2:671–675CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gentry RT, Dole VP (1987) Why does a sucrose choice reduce the consumption of alcohol in C57BL/6J mice? Life Sci 40:2191–2194CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gora-Maslak G, McClearn GE, Crabbe JC, Phillips TJ, Belknap JK, Plomin R (1991) Use of recombinant inbred strains to identify quantitative trait loci in pharmacogenetic research. Psychopharmacology 104:413–424PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gosnell BA, Krahn DD (1992) The relationship between saccharin and alcohol intake in rats. Alcohol 9:203–206CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kampov-Polevoy AB, Kasheffskaya OP, Sinclair JD (1990) Initial acceptance of ethanol: gustatory factors and patterns of alcohol drinking. Alcohol 7:83–86CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kiefer SW, Bice PJ, Orr MR, Dopp JM (1990) Similarity of taste reactivity responses to alcohol and sucrose mixtures in rats. Alcohol 7:115–120CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lush I (1981) Differences between mouse strains in their consumption of phenylthiourea (PTC). Heredity 57:319–323Google Scholar
  19. Lush I (1984) The genetics of tasting in mice. III. Quinine. Genet Res 44:151–160PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lush I (1989) The genetics of tasting in mice. VI. Saccharin, acesulfame, dulcin and sucrose. Genet Res 53:95–99PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lush I, Holland G (1988) The genetics of tasting in mice. V. Glycine and cycloheximide. Genet Res 52:207–212PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. McClearn GE (1968) Genetics and motivation in the mouse. In: Arnold WJ (ed) Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Lincoln, NE, pp 47–83Google Scholar
  23. Nachman M, LaRue C, LeMagnen J (1971) The role of olfactory and orosensory factors in the alcohol preference of inbred strains of mice. Physiol Behav 6:53–59CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Overstreet DH, Kampov-Polevoy AB, Rezvani AH, Lenn M, Halikas JA, Janowsky DS (1993) Saccharin intake predicts ethanol intake in genetically heterogeneous rats as well as different rat strains. Alcohol: Clin Exp Res (in press)Google Scholar
  25. Phillips TJ, Crabbe JC (1991) Behavioral studies of genetic differences in alcohol action. In: Crabbe JC, Harris RA (eds) The genetic basis of alcohol and drug actions. Plenum, NY, pp 25–104Google Scholar
  26. Richter CP (1941) Alcohol as food. Q J Stud Alcohol 1:650–662Google Scholar
  27. Rodgers DA (1972) Factors underlying differences in alcohol preference in inbred strains of mice. In: Kissin B, Begleiter H (eds) The biology of alcoholism. Plenum, NY, pp 107–130Google Scholar
  28. Rodgers D, McClearn GE, Bennett E, Hebert M (1963) Alcohol preference as a function of its caloric utility in mice. J Comp Physiol Psychol 56:666–672PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Schlesinger K (1966) Genetic and biochemical correlates of alcohol preference in mice. Am J Psychiatry 122:767–773PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Schlesinger K, Kakihana R, Bennett E (1966) Effects of tetraethylthiuramdisulfide (Antabuse) on the metabolism and consumption of ethanol in mice. Psychosom Med 28:514–520Google Scholar
  31. Schneider CW, Evans SK, Chenoweth M, Beman F (1973) Ethanol preference and behavioral tolerance in mice. J Comp Physiol Psychol 82:466–474PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Sheppard JR, Albersheim P, McClearn GE (1970) Aldehyde dehydrogenase and ethanol preference in mice. J Biol Chem 245:2875–2882Google Scholar
  33. Thiessen DD, Whitworth N, Rodgers D (1967) Reproductive functions and metabolic capacity as determinants of alcohol preference in C57BL female mice. J Comp Physiol Psychol 63:151–154PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Whitney G (1972) Relationships between alcohol preference and other behaviors in laboratory mice. In: Forsander O, Eriksson K (eds) Biological aspects of alcohol consumption. Finn Fdn Alc Studies, Helsinki, pp 151–162Google Scholar
  35. Wilkinson L (1990) Systat: the system for statistics. Systat, Evanston, ILGoogle Scholar
  36. Wilson CWM (1972) The limiting factors in alcohol consumption. In: Forsander O, Eriksson K (eds) Biological aspects of alcohol consumption. Finn Fdn Alc Studies, Helsinki, pp 207–215Google Scholar
  37. Yoshimoto K, Komura S (1987) Reexamination of the relationship between alcohol preference and brain monoamines in inbred strains of mice including senescence-accelerated mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 27:317–322CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. K. Belknap
    • 1
    • 2
  • J. C. Crabbe
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • E. R. Young
    • 1
  1. 1.Research Service (151 W), VA Medical CenterOregon Health Sciences UniversityPortlandUSA
  2. 2.Department of Medical PsychologyOregon Health Sciences UniversityPortlandUSA
  3. 3.Department of PharmacologyOregon Health Sciences UniversityPortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations