Psychopharmacology

, Volume 115, Issue 1–2, pp 229–236 | Cite as

On the efficacy of alcohol placebos in inducing feelings of intoxication

  • Donald J. O'Boyle
  • Alice S. Binns
  • John J. Summer
Original Investigations

Abstract

Placebo efficacy was monitored during three separate experiments concerned with the effects of ethanol (0.8 ml/kg body weight) on some aspect of performance: at regular intervals during experimental sessions, blood alcohol concentration was estimated using a breathalyser and subjects completed an intoxication rating. The simple placebo beverages and manipulations employed were similar to those typically described in the literature, and each experiment involved a repeated measures design. Across the three experiments, maximum mean (median) ratings during placebo sessions, expressed as a percentage of those during alcohol sessions of equivalent period, ranged between 10% (0%) and 69% (72%), and the number of subjects in each experiment for whom a placebo effect was considered to have been negligible ranged between 8% and 73%. For each treatment, intoxication ratings were higher during treatment periods which occurred first than during those which occurred second. However, this transfer effect was twice as large for placebo treatments as for alcohol treatments and, whereas in respect of the latter the effect was statistically non-significant, it was highly significant in respect of the former. The occurrence of such asymmetrical transfer of placebo efficacy suggests that repeated measures designs should be used with caution in drug studies in which a convincing placebo treatment is necessary and difficult to devise.

Key words

Alcohol Placebo Intoxication Repeated measures Asymmetrical transfer 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cohen J (1989) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  2. Cotton JW (1989) Interpreting data from two-period crossover design (also termed the replicated 2 × 2 latin square design). Psychol Bull 106:503–515Google Scholar
  3. Edgington ES (1972) An additive method for combining probability values from independent experiments. J Psychol 80:351–363Google Scholar
  4. Grizzle, JE (1965) The two-period change-over design and its use in clinical trials. Biometrics 21:467–480Google Scholar
  5. Grizzle JE (1974) Correction. Biometrics 30:727Google Scholar
  6. Hills M, Armitage P (1979) The two-period cross-over clinical trial. Br J Pharmacol 8:7–20Google Scholar
  7. Horne JA, Östberg O (1976) A self-assessment questionnaire to determine morningness-eveningness in human circadian rhythms. Int J Chronobiol 4:97–110Google Scholar
  8. Hull JG, Bond CF (1986) Social and behavioral consequences of alcohol consumption and expectancy: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 99:347–360Google Scholar
  9. Jones AW, Jönsson KA (1993) Determination of ethanol in breath and estimation of blood alcohol concentration with alcolmeter S-D2 In: Utzelmann H-D, Berghaus G, Kroj G (eds) Proc 12th Int Conf on alcohol, drugs and traffic safety. TÜV Rheinland, Cologne, pp 423–429Google Scholar
  10. Mendelson JH, McGuire M, Mello NK (1984) A new device for administering placebo alcohol. Alcohol 1:417–419Google Scholar
  11. Millar K (1983) Asymmetrical transfer: an inherent weakness of repeated-measure drug experiments. Br J Psychiatry 143:480–486Google Scholar
  12. Millar K, Wilkinson RT (1981) The effects upon vigilance and reaction speed of the addition of ephedrine hydrochloride and chlorpheniramine maleate. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 20:351–357Google Scholar
  13. Poulton EC (1973) Unwanted range effects from using within-subject experimental designs. Psychol Bull 80:113–121Google Scholar
  14. Poulton EC (1982) Influential companions: effects of one strategy on another in the within-subjects designs of cognitive psychology. Psychol Bull 91:673–690Google Scholar
  15. Poulton EC, Edwards RS (1979) Asymmetric transfer in within-subjects experiments on stress interaction. Ergonomics 22:954–961Google Scholar
  16. Poulton EC, Freeman PR (1966) Unwanted asymmetrical transfer effects with balanced experimental designs. Psychol Bull 66:1–8Google Scholar
  17. Rohsenow DJ, Marlatt GA (1981) The balanced placebo design: methodological considerations. Addict Behav 6:107–122Google Scholar
  18. Rosenthal R (1984) Meta-analytic procedures for social research (Applied social research methods series vol 6). Sage, Beverley HillsGoogle Scholar
  19. Selzer ML, Vinokur A, van Rooijen L (1975) A self-administered Short Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (SMAST). J Stud Alcohol 36:117–126Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donald J. O'Boyle
    • 1
    • 2
  • Alice S. Binns
    • 1
  • John J. Summer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK
  2. 2.Room 1.124, School of Biological SciencesUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations