Psychopharmacology

, Volume 115, Issue 1–2, pp 196–205 | Cite as

Effects of the neuroleptic α-flupenthixol on latent inhibition in aversively- and appetitively-motivated paradigms: evidence for dopamine-reinforcer interactions

  • A. S. Killcross
  • A. Dickinson
  • T. W. Robbins
Original Investigations

Abstract

Three experiments examined the influence of the dopamine (DA) D1/D2 receptor antagonist α-flupenthixol on the latent inhibition (LI) effect. LI is a phenomenon which is manifest when non-reinforced pre-exposure to a stimulus retards subsequent conditioning to that stimulus, and has been proposed as an animal model of the selective attentional processes that are disrupted in acute schizophrenia. Experiment 1 extended previous findings that neuroleptics enhance the LI effect in conditioned suppression paradigms in rats to α-flupenthixol (0.23 mg/kg). Experiment 2 demonstrated that this enhancement of the LI effect was also seen in a parallel appetitively-motivated conditioning paradigm at the same dose. In both Experiment 1 and Experiment 2, the enhancement of the LI effect by α-flupenthixol appeared to be accompanied by a decrease in the impact of the reinforcer (be it appetitive or aversive). Experiment 3 investigated the possible role of the reinforcer in the effect of α-flupenthixol on the LI effect in the aversive, conditioned suppression paradigm by increasing the intensity of footshock in rats treated with α-flupenthixol. Increasing the intensity of the footshock completely abolished the enhancement of LI found following injection of α-flupenthixol, a result which could not be attributed to a floor effect. The results provide no support for interpretations of the influence of DA manipulations on the LI effect that draw parallels with deficits in selective attention observed in acute schizophrenia.

Key words

Dopamine Latent inhibition Schizophrenia α-Flupenthixol Neuroleptic Conditioning Attention 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anscombe R (1987) The disorder of consciousness in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 13:241–260.Google Scholar
  2. Baruch I, Hemsley D, Gray JA (1988) Differential performance of acute and chronic schizophrenics in a latent inhibition task. J Nerv Ment Dis 176:598–606Google Scholar
  3. Beninger RJ (1989) The role of dopamine and serotonin in learning to avoid aversive stimuli. In: Archer T, Nilsson L-G (eds) Aversion, avoidance and anxiety: perspectives on aversively motivated behaviour. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., pp 265–284Google Scholar
  4. Beninger RJ, Mason ST, Phillips AG, Fibiger HC (1980) The use of extinction to investigate the nature of neuroleptic-induced avoidance deficits. Psychopharmacology 69:11–18Google Scholar
  5. Beninger RJ, Hoffman DC, Mazurski EJ (1989) Receptor subtype-specific dopaminergic agents and conditioned behaviour. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 13:113–122Google Scholar
  6. Blackburn JR, Pfaus JG, Phillips AG (1992) Dopamine functions in appetitive and defensive behaviours. Prog Neurobio, 39:247–279Google Scholar
  7. Bonem M, Crossman EK (1988) Elucidating the effects of reinforcement magnitude. Psychol Bull 104:348–382Google Scholar
  8. Bouton ME (1991) Context retrieval in extinction and in other examples of interference in simple associative learning. In: Dachowski LW, Flaherty CF (eds) Current topics in animal learning: brain, emotion and cognition. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., pp 25–53Google Scholar
  9. Bouton ME, Rosengard C, Achenbach GG, Peck CA, Brooks DC (1993) Effects of contextual conditioning and unconditional stimulus presentation on performance in appetitive conditioning. Q J Exp Psychol 46B[1]: 63–95Google Scholar
  10. Cador M, Taylor JR, Robbins TW (1991) Potentiation of the effects of reward-related stimuli by dopaminergic-dependent mechanisms in the nucleus accumbens. Psychopharmacology 104:377–385Google Scholar
  11. Castellano C, Cestari V, Cabib S, Puglisi-Allegra S (1991) Posttraining dopamine receptor agonists and antagonists affect memory storage in mice irrespective of their selectivity for D1 or D2 receptors. Behav Neur Biol 56:283–291Google Scholar
  12. Christison GW, Atwater GE, Dunn LA, Kilts CD (1988) Haloperidol enhancement of latent inhibition — relation to therapeutic action. Biol Psychiatry 23[7]: 746–749Google Scholar
  13. Cohen JD, Servan-Schreiber D (1992) Context, cortex, and dopamine: a connectionist approach to behavior and biology in schizophrenia. Psychol Rev 99[1]: 45–77Google Scholar
  14. Cohen JD, Servan-Schreiber D (1993) A theory of dopamine function and its role in cognitive deficits in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 19[1]: 85–104Google Scholar
  15. Creese I, Burt D, Snyder S (1976) Dopamine receptor binding predicts clinical and pharmacological potencies of antischizophrenic drugs. Science 192:381–482Google Scholar
  16. Dunn LA, Atwater GE, Kilts CD (1993) Effects of antipsychotic drugs on latent inhibition: sensitivity and specificity of an animal behavioural model of clinical drug action. Psychopharmacology 112:315–323Google Scholar
  17. Ettenberg A (1989) Dopamine, neuroleptics and rewarded behavior. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 13:105–111Google Scholar
  18. Feldon J, Weiner I (1991) The latent inhibition model of schizophrenic attention disorder: haloperidol and sulpiride enhance rats ability to ignore irrelevant stimuli. Biol Psychiatry 29:635–646Google Scholar
  19. Garmezy N (1977) The psychology and psychopathology of attention, Schizophr Bull 3:360–368Google Scholar
  20. Gray JA, Feldon J, Rawlins JNP, Hemsley DR, Smith AD (1991) The neuropsychology of schizophrenia. Behav Brain Sci 14:1–84Google Scholar
  21. Hall G (1991) Perceptual and associative learning. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Hall G, Channell S (1986) Context specificity of latent inhibition in taste aversion learning. Q J Exp Psychol 38B: 121–139Google Scholar
  23. Hall G, Minor H (1984) A search for context stimulus associations in latent inhibition. Q J Exp Psychol 36B: 145–169Google Scholar
  24. Jaskiw GE, Weinberger DR (1992) Dopamine and schizophrenia — a cortically corrective perspective. Semin Neurosci 4:179–188Google Scholar
  25. Joseph MH, Peters SL, Gray JA (1993) Nicotine blocks latent inhibition in rats: evidence for a critical role of increased functional activity of dopamine in the mesolimbic system at conditioning rather than pre-exposure. Psychopharmacology 110:1–2, 187–192Google Scholar
  26. Kalat JW (1977) Status of “learned safety” of “learned noncorrelation” as a mechanism in taste aversion learning. In: Barker LM, Best MR, Domjan M (eds) Learning mechanisms in food selection. Baylor University Press, Waco, Texas, pp 273–293Google Scholar
  27. Killcross AS (1993) The underestimation of latent inhibition. Talk delivered at the Experimental Analysis of Behaviour Group, annual meeting, London, April, 1993Google Scholar
  28. Killcross AS, Robbins TW (1993) Differential effects of intra-accumbens and systemic amphetamine on latent inhibition using an on-baseline, within-subject conditioned suppression paradigm. Psychopharmacology 110:449–459Google Scholar
  29. Killcross AS, Dickinson A, Robbins TW (1994) Amphetamine-induced abolitions of latent inhibition are reinforcer mediated: implications for animal models of schizophrenia. Psychopharmacology 115:185–195Google Scholar
  30. Konstandi M, Kafetzopoulos E (1993) Effects of striatal or accumbens lesions on the amphetamine-induced abolition of latent inhibition. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 44[4]: 751–754Google Scholar
  31. Kraemer PJ, Ossenkopp KP (1986) The effects of flavour pre-exposure and test interval on conditioned taste aversion in rats. Bull Psychonom Soc 24:219–224Google Scholar
  32. Kraemer PJ, Spear NE (1992) The effect of nonreinforced stimulus pre-exposure on the strength of a conditioned taste aversion as a function of retention interval: do latent inhibition and extinction involve a shared process? Anim Learn Behav 20[1]: 1–7Google Scholar
  33. Lauener H (1962) Conditioned suppression in rats and the effect of pharmacological agents thereon. Psychopharmacologia 4:311–325Google Scholar
  34. Lauzi Gozzani J, Izquierdo I (1976) Possible peripheral adrenergic and central dopaminergic influences in memory consolidation. Psychopharmacology 49:109–111Google Scholar
  35. Liebman JM, Cooper SJ (1989) The neuropharmacological basis of reward. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  36. Lovibond PF, Preston GC, Mackintosh NJ (1984) Context specificty of conditioning, extinction, and latent inhibition. J Exp Psychol [Anim Behav Proc] 10:360–375Google Scholar
  37. Lubow RE (1973) Latent inhibition. Psychol Bull 79:398–407Google Scholar
  38. Lubow RE (1989) Latent inhibition and conditioned attention theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  39. Lubow RE, Weiner I, Schnur R (1981) Conditioned attention theory. In: Bower GH (ed) The psychology of learning and motivation, vol. 15. Academic Press, New York, pp 1–49Google Scholar
  40. McDonald RJ, White NM (1993) A triple dissociation of memory systems: hippocampus, amygdala and dorsal striatum, Behav Neurosci 107[1]:3–22Google Scholar
  41. McGaugh JL (1989) Involvement of hormonal and neuromodulatory systems in the regulation of memory storage. Annu Rev Neurosci 12:255–287Google Scholar
  42. McLaren IPL, Kaye H, Mackintosh NJM (1989) An associative theory of the representation of stimuli: applications to perceptual learning and latent inhibition. In: Morris RGM (ed) Parallel distributed processing: implications for psychology and neurobiology. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 102–130Google Scholar
  43. Miller R, Wickens JR, Beninger RJ (1990) Dopamine D1 and D2 receptors in relation to reward and performance: a case for the D1 receptor as a primary site of therapeutic action of neuroleptic drugs. Prog Neurobiol 34:143–183Google Scholar
  44. Muscat R, Willner P (1989) Effects of dopamine receptor antagonists on sucrose consumption and preference. Psychopharmacology 99:98–102Google Scholar
  45. Paré WP (1969) Age, sex, and strain differences in the aversive threshold to grid shock in the rat. J Comp Physiol Psychol 69[2]: 214–218Google Scholar
  46. Peters SL, Joseph MH (1993) Haloperidol potentiation of latent inhibition in rats: evidence for a critical role at conditioning rather than pre-exposure. Behav Pharmacol 4[2]: 183–186Google Scholar
  47. Reed P (1991) Multiple determinants of the effects of reinforcement magnitude on free-operant response rates. J Exp Anal Behav 55:109–123Google Scholar
  48. Revusky S (1971) The role of interference in association over a delay. In: Honig WK, James PHR (eds) Animal memory. Academic Press, New York, pp 155–213Google Scholar
  49. Revusky S (1977) The concurrent interference approach to delay learning. In: Barker LM, Best MR, Domjan M (eds) Learning mechanisms in food selection. Baylor University Press, Waco, Texas, pp 319–366Google Scholar
  50. Robbins TW (1990) The case for frontostriatal dysfunction in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 16:391–402Google Scholar
  51. Robinson TE, Becker JB (1986) Enduring changes in brain and behaviour produced by chronic amphetamine administration: a review and evaluation of animal models of amphetamine psychosis. Brain Res Rev 11:157–198Google Scholar
  52. Sedvall G (1990) PET imaging of dopamine receptors in human basal ganglia: relevance to mental illness. Trends Neurosci 13:302–308,Google Scholar
  53. Solomon PR, Crider A (1988) Towards an animal model of schizophrenia. In: Simon P, Soubrié P, Widlocher D (eds) An inquiry into schizophrenia and depression (animal models of psychiatric disorders, vol 2). Karger, Switzerland, pp 21–42Google Scholar
  54. Solomon PR, Staton DM (1982) Differential effects of microinjections ofd-amphetamine into the nucleus accumbens or the caudate-putamen on the rat's ability to ignore an irrelevant stimulus. Biol Psychiatry 17:743–756Google Scholar
  55. Solomon PR, Crider A, Winkleman JW, Kam RM, Kaplan LI (1981) Disrupted latent inhibition in the rat with chronic amphetamine or haloperidol-induced supersensitivity: relationship to schizophrenic attention disorder. Biol Psychiatry 16:519–537Google Scholar
  56. Swerdlow NR, Koob GF (1987) Dopamine, schizophrenia, mania and depression: toward a unified hypothesis of cortico-striato-pallido-thalamic function. Behav Brain Sci 10:197–245Google Scholar
  57. Swerdlow NR, Koob GF, Geyer MA, Mansbach R, Braff DL (1988) A cross-species model of psychosis. Sensorimotor gating deficits in schizophrenic patients and dopaminergically activated rats. In: Simon P, Soubrié P, Widlocher D (eds) An inquiry into schizophrenia and depression (animal models of psychiatric disorders, vol 2). Karger, Switzerland, pp 1–18Google Scholar
  58. Van Rossum JM (1967) The significance of dopamine receptor blockade for neuroleptic drugs. In: Brill H, Cole JO, Deniker P, Hippius H, Bradley PB (eds) Proc 5th Coll Int Neuropsy-chopharm, pp 321–329Google Scholar
  59. Viaud MD, White NM (1989) Dissociation of visual and olfactory conditioning in the neostriatum of rats. Behav Brain Res 32:31–42Google Scholar
  60. Wagner AR (1981) SOP: a model of automatic memory processing in animal behaviour. In: Spear NE, Miller RR (eds) Information processing in animals: memory mechanisms. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 5–47Google Scholar
  61. Weiner I (1990) Neural substrates of latent inhibition: the switching model. Psychol Bull 108:442–461Google Scholar
  62. Weiner I, Feldon J (1987) Facilitation of latent inhibition by haloperidol. Psychopharmacology 91:248–253Google Scholar
  63. Weiner I, Lubow RE, Feldon J (1981) Chronic amphetamine and latent inhibition. Behav Brain Res 2:285–286Google Scholar
  64. Weiner I, Lubow RE, Feldon J (1984) Abolition of the expression but not the acquisition of latent inhibition by chronic amphetamine in rats. Psychopharmacology 83:194–199Google Scholar
  65. Weiner I, Feldon J, Katz J (1987) Facilitation of the expression but not the acquisition of latent inhibition by haloperidol in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 26:241–246Google Scholar
  66. Weiner I, Lubow RE, Feldon J (1988) Disruption of latent inhibition by acute administration of low doses of amphetamine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 30:871–878Google Scholar
  67. Weiss KR, Brown PL (1974) Latent inhibition: a review and a new hypothesis. Acta Neurobiol Exp 34:301–316Google Scholar
  68. White NM (1989) A functional hypothesis concerning the striatal matrix and patches: Mediation of S-R memory and reward. Life Sci 45:1943–1957Google Scholar
  69. White NM, Milner PM (1992) The psychobiology of reinforcers. Annu Rev Psychol 43:443–471Google Scholar
  70. White NM, Viaud M (1991) Localized intracaudate dopamine D2 receptor activation during the post-training period improves memory for visual or olfactory conditioned emotional responses in rats. Behav Neural Biol 55:255–269Google Scholar
  71. Wilkinson LS, Killcross AS, Humby T, Hall FS, Geyer MA, Robbins TW (1994) Social isolation in the rat produces developmentally specific deficits in pre-pulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response but does not disrupt latent inhibition. Neuropsychopharmacology 10[1]:61–72Google Scholar
  72. Willner P, Phillips G, Muscat R (1991) Suppression of rewarded behaviour by neuroleptic drugs: can't or won't, and why? In: Willner P, Scheel-Kruger J (eds) The mesolimbic dopamine system: from motivation to action. Wiley, London, pp 251–273Google Scholar
  73. Winer BJ (1971) Statistical principles of experimental design. 2nd edition. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  74. Wise RA (1982) Neuroleptics and operant behavior: the anhedonia hypothesis. Behav Brain Sci 5:39–87Google Scholar
  75. Wolterink G, Phillips G, Cador M, Donselaar-Wolterink I, Robbins TW, Everitt BJ (1993) Relative roles of ventral striatal D1 and D2 dopamine receptors in responding with conditioned reinforcement. Psychopharmacology 110:355–364Google Scholar
  76. Worms P, Broekkamp CLE, Lloyd KG (1983) Behavioural effects of neuroleptics. In: Coyle JT, Enna SJ (eds) Neuroleptics: neurochemical, behavioral, and clinical perspectives. Raven Press, New York, pp 93–118Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. S. Killcross
    • 1
  • A. Dickinson
    • 1
  • T. W. Robbins
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Experimental PsychologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations