Psychopharmacology

, Volume 104, Issue 2, pp 171–176

Selective dopamine antagonists reduce nicotine self-administration

  • William A. Corrigall
  • Kathleen M. Coen
Original Investigations
  • 192 Downloads

Abstract

The effects of selective D1 (SCH23390) and D2 (spiperone) dopamine antagonists, as well as of haloperidol, were examined on nicotine self-administration, food-maintained responding, and locomotor activity in rats. Antagonists reduced both operant responding and locomotor activity. Response patterns indicated that motor impairment was not the cause of the decreases, since responding was attenuated only in the latter half of operant sessions. Locomotor activity scores were significantly reduced by SCH23390, but not by spiperone. The effects of dopamine antagonists on nicotine self-administration are different from the effects of these antagonists on cocaine self-administration. Results are discussed in terms of the role of dopamine in drug reinforcement versus its role in sensorimotor integration.

Key words

Nicotine self-administration Locomotor activity Dopamine antagonists SCH23390 Spiperone 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Calabresi P, Lacey MG, North RA (1989) Nicotinic excitation of rat ventral tegmental neurones in vitro studied by intracellular recording. Br J Pharmacol 98:135–140Google Scholar
  2. Clarke PBS, Pert A (1985) Autoradiographic evidence for nicotine receptors on nigrostriatal and mesolimbic dopaminergic neurons. Brain Res 348:355–358Google Scholar
  3. Clarke PBS, Fu DS, Jakubovic A, Fibiger HC (1988) Evidence that mesolimbic dopaminergic activation underlies the locomotor stimulant action of nicotine in rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 246:701–708Google Scholar
  4. Corrigall WA (1991) A rodent model for nicotine self-administration. In: Boulton AA, Baker GB, Wu PH (eds) Animal models of drug addiction. Neuromethods, vol 21. Human Press, Clifton (in press)Google Scholar
  5. Corrigall WA, Coen KM (1989) Nicotine maintains robust self-administration in rats on a limited-access schedule. Psychopharmacology 99:473–478Google Scholar
  6. Ettenberg A, Pettit HO, Bloom FE, Koob GF (1982) Heroin and cocaine intravenous self-administration in rats: mediation by separate neural systems. Psychopharmacology 78:204–209Google Scholar
  7. Grenhoff J, Aston-Jones G, Svensson TH (1986) Nicotinic effects on the firing pattern of mid-brain dopamine neurons. Acta Physiol Scand 128:351–358Google Scholar
  8. Imperato A, Mulus A, Di Chiara G (1986) Nicotine preferentially stimulates dopamine release in the limbic system of freely moving rats. Eur J Pharmacol 132:337–338Google Scholar
  9. Izenwasser S, Jacocks HM, Cox BM (1991) Effects of (−) and (+) nicotine on [3H]DA uptake and release in rat striatum. NIDA Res Monograph (in press)Google Scholar
  10. Johanson CE, Fischman MW (1989) The pharmacology of cocaine related to its abuse. Pharmacol Rev 41:3–52Google Scholar
  11. Koob GF, Le HT, Creese I (1987) The D1 dopamine receptor antagonist SCH23390 increases cocaine self-administration in the rat. Neurosci Lett 79:315–320Google Scholar
  12. Lapin EP, Maker HS, Sershen H, Lajtha A (1989) Action of nicotine on accumbens dopamine and attenuation with repeated administration. Eur J Pharmacol 160:53–59Google Scholar
  13. Mereu G, Yoon K-WP, Boi V, Gessa GL, Naes L, Westfall TC (1987) Preferential stimulation of ventral tegmental area dopaminergic neurons by nicotine. Eur J Pharmacol 141:395–399Google Scholar
  14. Mifsud JC, Hernandez L, Hoebel BG (1989) Nicotine infused into the nucleus accumbens increases synaptic dopamine as measured by in vivo microdialysis. Brain Res 478:365–367Google Scholar
  15. Museo E, Wise RA (1990) Locomotion induced by ventral tegmental microinjections of a nicotinic agonist. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 35:735–737Google Scholar
  16. Reavill C, Stolerman IP (1987) Interaction of nicotine with dopaminergic mechanisms assessed through drug discrimination and rotational behaviour in rats. J Psychopharmacol 1:264–273Google Scholar
  17. Reavill C, Stolerman IP (1990) Locomotor activity in rats after administration of nicotinic agonists intracerebrally. Br J Pharmacol 99:273–278Google Scholar
  18. Singer G, Wallace M (1984) Effects of 6-OHDA lesions in the nucleus accumbens on the acquisition of self injection of heroin under schedule and non-schedule conditions in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 20:807–809Google Scholar
  19. Singer G, Wallace M, Hall R (1982) Effects of dopaminergic nucleus accumbens lesions on the acquisition of schedule induced self injection of nicotine in the rat. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 17:579–581Google Scholar
  20. Snodgrass SH, Allen JD (1987) Effect of dopamine agents on schedule-and deprivation-induced drinking in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 27:463–475Google Scholar
  21. Vaccarino FJ, Corrigall WA (1987) Effects of opiate antagonist treatment into either the preiaqueductal grey or nucleus accumbens on heroin-induced locomotor activity. Brain Res Bull 19:545–549Google Scholar
  22. White NM (1986) Control of sensorimotor function by dopaminergic neurons: Influence on eating and drinking. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 10:15–36Google Scholar
  23. Wise RA, Bozarth MA (1987) A psychomotor stimulant theory of addiction. Psychol Rev 94:469–492Google Scholar
  24. Woolverton WL (1986) Effects of a D1 and a D2 dopamine antagonist on the self-administration of cocaine and piribedil by rhesus monkeys. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 24:531–535Google Scholar
  25. Woolverton WL, Virus RM (1989) The effects of a D1 and a D2 dopamine antagonist on behavior maintained by cocaine or food. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 32:691–697Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • William A. Corrigall
    • 1
    • 2
  • Kathleen M. Coen
    • 1
  1. 1.Addiction Research FoundationTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Department of PhysiologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations