Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

A comparison of the effects of scopolamine and diazepam on acquisition and retention of inhibitory avoidance in mice

  • 45 Accesses

  • 50 Citations

Abstract

Administration of either the muscarinic antagonist scopolamine or the benzodiazepine diazepam prior to training produced a dose-dependent impairment in the retention of one-trial inhibitory avoidance training in mice. To investigate the nature of this drug effect, the effects of scopolamine and diazepam were subsequently assessed on both acquisition and retention of inhibitory avoidance using a multiple-trial, training-to-criterion procedure. The training was conducted using either continuous trials in which the mouse was free to shuttle back and forth between shock and safe compartments or discrete trials in which the mouse was moved from the shock compartment of the safe compartment at the start of each trial. In either case, training continued until the mouse refrained from crossing into the shock compartment for a specified length of time on a single trial. Scopolamine (1.0 mg/kg) administered before training significantly increased the number of trials required to attain criterion, but did not affect retention when these mice were tested 2, 16, or 28 days later. In contrast, diazepam (1.0 mg/kg) did not significantly alter the number of trials necessary to reach criterion, but impaired retention of the inhibitory response in mice trained using discrete trials. The differences in the amnestic effects of scopolamine and diazepam revealed by this detailed analysis suggest that diazepam does not impair inhibitory avoidance performance through an effect on cholinergic function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bammer G (1982) Pharmacological investigations of neurotransmitter involvement in passive avoidance responding: a review and some new results. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 6:247–296

  2. Brioni JD, Decker MW, Gamboa LP, Izquierdo I, McGaugh JL (1989) Muscimol injections in the medial septum impair spatial learning. Soc Neurosci Abstr 15:1173

  3. Cahill L, Brioni J, Izquierdo I (1986) Retrograde memory enhancement by diazepam: its relation to anterograde amnesia, and some clinical implications. Psychopharmacology 90:554–556

  4. Costa E, Panula P, Thompason HK, Cheney DL (1983) The trans-synaptic regulation of the septal-hippocampal cholinergic neurons. Life Sci 32:165–179

  5. Elrod K, Buccafusco JJ (1988) An evaluation of the mechanism of scopolamine-induced impairment in two passive avoidance protocols. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 29:15–21

  6. Fang JC, Hinrichs JV, Ghoneim MM (1987) Diazepam and memory: evidence for spared memory function. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 28:347–352

  7. Frumin MJ, Herekar VR, Jarvik ME (1976) Amnesic actions of diazepam and scopolamine in man. Anesthesiology 45:406–412

  8. Ghoneim MM, Mewaldt SP (1975) Effects of diazepam and scopolamine on storage, retrieval and organizational processes in memory. Psychopharmacologia 44:257–262

  9. Ghoneim MM, Mewaldt SP (1977) Studies on human memory: the interactions of diazepam, scopolamine, and physostigmine. Psychopharmacology 52:1–6

  10. Jensen RA, Martinez JL Jr, Vasquez BJ, McGaugh JL (1979) Benzodiazepines alter acquisition and retention of an inhibitory avoidance response in mice. Psychopharmacology 64:125–126

  11. Jensen LH, Stephens DN, Sarter M, Petersen EN (1987) Bidirectional effects ofβ-carbolines and benzodiazepines on cognitive processes. Brain Res Bull 19:359–364

  12. Lal H, Kumar B, Forster MJ (1988) Enhancement of learning and memory in mice by a benzodiazepine antagonist. FASEB J 2:2707–2711

  13. Lenegre A, Chermat R, Avril I, Steru L, Porsolt RD (1988) Specificity of piracetam's anti-amnesic activity in three models of amnesia in the mouse. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 29:625–629

  14. Lister RG (1985) The amnesic action of benzodiazepines in man. Neurosci Biohav Rev 9:87–94

  15. Miczek KA (1973) Effects of scopolamine, amphetamine and chlordiazepoxide on punishment. Psychopharmacologia 28:373–389

  16. Miczek KA, Lau P (1975) Effects of scopolamine, physostigmine and chloridazepoxide on punished and extinguished water consumption in rats. Psychopharmacologia 42:263–269

  17. Murphy DE, Boast CA (1985) Searching for models of Alzheimer's disease: a comparison of four amnestic treatments in two behavioral tasks. Ann NY Acad Sci 444:450–452

  18. Nissen MJ, Knopman DS, Schacter DL (1987) Neurochemical dissociation of memory systems. Neurology 37:789–794

  19. Overstreet DH (1984) Behavioural plasticity and the cholinergic system. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 8:133–151

  20. Richardson JTE, Frith CD, Scott E, Crow TJ, Cunningham-Owens D (1984) The effects of intravenous diazepam and hyoscine upon recognition memory. Behav Brain Res 14:193–199

  21. Rush DK (1988) Scopolamine amnesia of passive avoidance: a deficit of information acquisition. Behav Neural Biol 50:255–274

  22. Sarter M, Schneider HH, Stephens DN (1988) Treatment strategies for senile dementia: antagonistβ-carbolines. Trends Neurosci 11:13–17

  23. Spangler EL, Chachich ME, Ingram DK (1988) Scopolamine in rats impairs acquisition but not retention in a 14-unit T-maze. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 30:949–955

  24. Spencer DG Jr, Lal H (1983) Effects of anticholinergic drugs on learning and memory. Drug Dev Res 3:489–502

  25. Thiebot M-H (1985) Some evidence for amnesic-like effects of benzodiazepines in animals. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 9:95–100

  26. Waddington JL, Olley JE (1977) Dissociation of the anti-punishment activities of chloridazepoxide and atropine using two heterogeneous passive avoidance tasks. Psychopharmacology 52:93–96

  27. Warburton DM, Wesnes K (1984) Drugs as research tools in psychology: cholinergic drugs and information processing. Neuropsychobiology 11:121–132

  28. Wood PL (1986) Pharmacological evaluation of GABAergic and glutamatergic inputs to the nucleus basalis-cortical and the septal-hippocampal cholinergic projections. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 64:325–328

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Michael W. Decker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Decker, M.W., Tran, T. & McGaugh, J.L. A comparison of the effects of scopolamine and diazepam on acquisition and retention of inhibitory avoidance in mice. Psychopharmacology 100, 515–521 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02244005

Download citation

Key words

  • Inhibitory (passive) avoidance
  • Memory
  • Mice
  • Acetylcholine
  • Benzodiazepines