Advertisement

European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research

, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp 113–123 | Cite as

Identifying, explaining, and targeting burglary ‘hot spots’

  • Trevor Bennett
Article

Conclusion

The data-gathering and crime analysis part of the Task Force programme (while not yet completed) has generated some useful information about burglary in Cambridge which might inform a crime prevention strategy. The research has shown that residential burglary is not evenly distributed across Cambridge, but tends to be clustered in the northwest of the City. It has also shown that even in these high-burglary areas there are ‘hot spots’ and ‘cold spots’ of crime. These hot spots account for a relatively large proportion of all burglary.

One factor contributing to the high burglary counts in the hot spot area is the high number of repeat burglaries, with as many as 35 percent of all burglaries recorded in the area being one of a repeat series of burglaries. Another factor which might have contributed to the high burglary counts was the abundance of access and escape routes of the kind identified in the environmental survey. Perhaps the most important factor which explains the high number of burglaries was the closeness of the area to the place of residence of known offenders. The hot spot site thus provides a local source of easy and rewarding opportunities for offenders who live in these areas.

In the second stage of its work, the Cambridge Burglary Task Force will collate the information that has been collected in the first stage and devise appropriate intervention strategies. We aim to continue to monitor crime and criminals in the area and to evaluate the effectiveness the programmes implemented.

Keywords

Prevention Strategy Local Source Crime Prevention Analysis Part Cold Spot 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bennett, T.H. Police strategies and tactics for controlling crime and disorder in England and WalesStudies on Crime and Crime Prevention, vol. 3, 1994, pp. 146–167Google Scholar
  2. Bennett, T.H., R. Wright Burglars on Burglary: Prevention and the Offender Aldershot, Gower, 1984Google Scholar
  3. Brantingham, P.J., P.L. Brantingham Environmental Criminology Beverly Hills (Cal.), Sage, 1981Google Scholar
  4. Clarke, R.V.G., M. Felson (eds.)Routine Activity and Rational Choice. Advances in Criminological Theory, vol. 5 London, Transaction, 1993Google Scholar
  5. Eck, J.E, W. Spelman Problem Solving: Problem-Oriented Policing in Newport News Washington (DC), Police Executive Research Forum, 1987Google Scholar
  6. Ekblom, P. Getting the Best out of Crime Analysis London, Home Office, 1988 Crime Prevention Unit Paper, no. 10Google Scholar
  7. Farrell, G., K. Pease Once Bitten, Twice Bitten: Repeat Victimisation and its Implications for Crime Prevention London, Home Office, 1993 Crime Prevention Unit Paper, no. 46Google Scholar
  8. Forrester, D., M. Chatterton, K. Pease The Kirkholt Burglary Prevention Project, Rochdale London, Home Office, 1988 Crime Prevention Unit Paper, no. 13Google Scholar
  9. Mayhew, P., N. Aye Maung, C. Mirrlees-Black The 1992 British Crime Survey London HMSO, 1993 Home Office Research Study, no. 132Google Scholar
  10. Polvi, N., T. Looman, C. Humphries, K. Pease The time course of repeat burglary victimisationBritish Journal of Criminology, vol. 31, 1991, pp. 411–414Google Scholar
  11. Rengert, G., J. Wasilchick Suburban Burglary: a Time and a Place for Everything Springfield (Ill.), Thomas, 1985Google Scholar
  12. Shapland, J., P. Wiles, P. Wilcox Targeted Crime Reduction: Principles and Methods London, Home Office, Police Research Group, 1994Google Scholar
  13. Sherman, L. Policing and crime control. In:Modern Policing: Crime and Justice, vol. 15 Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1992Google Scholar
  14. Sherman, L.W., P.R. Gartin, M.E. Buerger Hot spots of predatory crime: routine activities and the criminology of placeCriminology, vol. 27, no. 1, 1989, pp. 27–55Google Scholar
  15. Tilley, N., J. Webb Burglary Reduction: Findings from Safer Cities Schemes London, Home Office, 1994 Police Research Group Paper, no. 54Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kugler Publications 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Trevor Bennett
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of CriminologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeGreat Britain

Personalised recommendations