Environmentalist

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 19–26 | Cite as

The deep-ocean option for the disposal of sewage sludge

  • Martin V Angel
Papers

Summary

Present methods of disposal of high-bulk low-toxicity wastes, such as sewage sludge, into shallow marine environments are beginning to be questioned by many environmentalists. The alternative options generally considered all have environmental costs. A novel approach of discharging such wastes as slurries into the deep ocean at depths of 4,000 m close to the abyssal sea bed is considered. Such disposal would fulfil all the criteria required by the Oslo Convention before dumping at sea can be permitted, in that it isolates the waste from Man's ambit and offers no threat to present or foreseeable uses of the ocean. It also seems to fulfil the criteria of the World Conservation Strategy, so long as the oxygen levels in the deep waters of the ocean are not reduced excessively. The improvements in the quality of coastal seas would offset the doubling in the economic cost of disposal.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angel, M.V. and Baker, A. de C. (1982) Vertical distribution of the standing crop of plankton and micronekton at three stations in the North-east Atlantic.Biological Oceanography, 2, 1–29.Google Scholar
  2. Angel, M.V. (1986) Vertical migrations in the oceanic realm: Possible causes and probable effects. In Rankin, M.A. (ed.)Migration: Mechanisms and adaptive significance. Contributions in Marine Science, Supplement 27, pp. 45–70.Google Scholar
  3. GESAMP (1980) Monitoring biological variables related to marine pollution.Reports and Studies, 11, 1–22.Google Scholar
  4. GESAMP (1982) Scientific criteria for the selection of waste disposal sites at sea.Reports and Studies, 16, 1–60.Google Scholar
  5. Lampitt, R.S., Billett, D.S.M. and Rice, A.L. (1986) Biomass of the invertebrate megabenthos from 500 to 4,100 m in the North- east Atlantic Ocean.Marine Biology, 93, 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Pearson, T.H., Gray, J.S. and Johannesen, P.J. (1983) Objective selection of sensitive species indicative of pollution-induced change in benthic communities. 2. Data analyses.Marine Ecology - Progress Series, 12, 237–255.Google Scholar
  7. Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (1985) Eleventh Report.Managing Waste: The duty of Care. H.M.S.O. London 214pp.Google Scholar
  8. Warwick, R.M. (1986) A new model for detecting pollution effects on marine macrobenthic communities.Marine Biology, 92, 557–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science and Technology letters 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin V Angel
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Oceanographic Sciences, WormleyGodalmingUK

Personalised recommendations