Advertisement

Environmentalist

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 35–43 | Cite as

Teaching strategies for environmental education

  • David Stokes
  • Bruce Crawshaw
Article

Summary

It is possible to distinguish four target groups for tertiary environmental education: the Technical Group, the Subject Specialist Group, the Management Group and the Lay Group. Each of these groups requires different sets of skills and abilities. The Technical Group needs to know how to measure environmental parameters. The Subject Specialist Group needs to know about environmental systems. The Management Group needs to have the skills and abilities to resolve complex environmental issues and problems. The Lay Group needs to have attitudes, philosophies and values about the environment. Each of these in turn require different teaching strategies. For the Technical Group, practical experimental teaching methods based on the traditional subject approach appear to be the most suitable. The Subject Specialist Group needs presentational methods based on either an infusion approach or a new subject approach. For the Management Group, a combination of high level disciplinary teaching combined with intensive short skills courses and more extensive ‘junctions’ or ‘environmental encounters’, all of which make use of practice methods of teaching, are suggested. For the Lay Group, experiential methods, where the student's attitudes are challenged by experiences in either an in-service situation or through simulation exercises, seem to be most appropriate.

Keywords

Teaching Method Experimental Teaching Teaching Strategy Environmental System Management Group 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Crawshaw, B., Stokes, D. and Seddon, G. (1980)Survey of Training Methodology for Teachers of Environmental Education in the Far East, report on behalf of UNESCO, Paris.Google Scholar
  2. de Bono, E. (1967)The Five-Day Course in Thinking, Penguin, Harmondsworth, UK.Google Scholar
  3. de Bono, E. (1970)Lateral Thinking: Creativity Step by Step, Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
  4. de Bono, E. (1971)Lateral Thinking for Management; A Handbook of Creativity, McGraw-Hill, London.Google Scholar
  5. Hawrylyshyn, B. (1975) Management Education — a Conceptual Framework. In: Taylor, B. and Lippitt, G. (eds.)Management Development and Training Handbook. McGraw-Hill, London.Google Scholar
  6. Hubbard, F. (1980) Natural Systems Management for Development, Report from the East-West Environmental Policy Institute Workshop on Training for Natural Systems Management, 22 October to 2 November, 1979, East-West Center, Honolulu, Hawaii.Google Scholar
  7. Le Grew, D., Watson, D., Crawshaw, B., Itami, B. and Seddon, G. (1980)Creative Problem-Solving and Environmental Management — an Example, Centre for Environmental Studies, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
  8. Stapp, W. and Cox, D. (1979)Environmental Education Activities Manual, Stapp and Cox, Michigan.Google Scholar
  9. Stubbs, R., and Salih Verzosa, F., (eds.) (1981)Explorations in Large Scale Administrative Systems, East-West Centre and the Development Academy of the Philippines, Honolulu.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science and Technology Letters 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Stokes
    • 1
  • Bruce Crawshaw
    • 2
  1. 1.Victoria CollegeClaytonAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Environmental SciencesUniversiti Pertanian MalaysiaSerdangMalaysia

Personalised recommendations