Advertisement

Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

National programs to protect genetic diversity — The US example

  • 22 Accesses

Summary

A country which truly wishes to preserve the full range of genetic diversity with which it has been endowed must look beyond large biosphere reserves. It must inventory and protect individual species and habitat types in smaller preserves as well. The United States provides an example of a country which has a legacy of preserves. Much of the land that would be necessary for an effective preserve system has already been acquired, but basic information and coordination among agencies is lacking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Beltran, E., (1964) Use and recreation: two conflicting purposes. In A. Adams (ed.)Proceedings of the First World Conference on National Parks, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 471 pp.

  2. BLM (Bureau of Land Management), (1978)Public Land Statistics, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 191 pp.

  3. Boren, F. D. and Blair W. D., (1980) Decade of diversity,The Nature Conservancy News, 30(3) 2–7.

  4. Code of Federal Regulation, (1979) Title 36, Part 294.1, Recreation areas. Title 43, Sub-part 2071.1, Type and effect of designations—recreation lands. Title 50, Section 25.11, The natural wildlife refuge system-purpose of regulations.

  5. Darnell, R. M., (1976) Natural areas preservation: The US/IBP conservation of ecosystems program.BioScience, 26(2) 105–108.

  6. Federal Committee on Ecological Reserves, (1977)A Directory of Research Natural Areas on Federal Lands of the United States of America, Forest Service, Washington, D.C., 280 pp.

  7. Fish and Wildlife Service, (1976)Annual Report 1976, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 221 pp.

  8. Fish and Wildlife Service, (1980) Habitat acquisition: costly but necessary to the recovery of many endangered species,Endangered Species Technical Bulletin, 5(6) 5–10.

  9. IUCN (International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources), (1980)The World Conservation Strategy, IUCN, Morges, Switzerland.

  10. Jenkins, R., (1978) Habitat preservation by private organizations. In Brokaw, H. P. (ed.),Wildlife and America, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., pp. 532.

  11. Low, L. G., (1979) Unpublished xerox, April 19, 1979.

  12. Michigan Compiled Laws Annotated, The Wilderness and Natural Areas Act of 1972, MCLA sections 322.751–322.763.

  13. National Audubon Society, (n.d.)Islands of Life, The National Audubon Society Sanctuaries.

  14. NPS, (The National Park Service), (1980)The State of the Parks-1980, A Report to Congress, Office of Science and Technology, National Park Service, Washington, D.C., 57 pp.

  15. National Park Service, (1972)Part Two of the National Park System Plan: Natural History, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C.

  16. TNC (The Nature Conservancy), (1977)Preserving Our Natural Heritage, V. 1 Federal Activities, 323 pp., V. 2 State Activities, 671 pp., U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

  17. TNC (The Nature Conservancy), (1979) 1978: Year in Review.The Nature Conservancy News, 20(3) 2–5.

  18. TNC (The Nature Conservancy), (1980) Decade of diversity,The Nature Conservancy News, 30(3) 2–7.

  19. U.S. Bureau of the Census, (1979)Statistical Abstracts of the United States, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

  20. U.S. Congress, (1964) The Wilderness Act, P.L. 88–577, 16 U.S.C. 1131–1136.

  21. U.S. Congress, (1976) General Authorities Act of 1976, P.L. 94–458.

  22. U.S. Congress, (1978) Amendments to the Endangered Species Act of 1973, P. L. 95–632, 16 U.S.C.A. 1531–1543.

  23. U.S. Congress, (1979)National Wilderness Preservation System, 14th Annual Report, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 96 pp.

  24. U.S. House of Representatives, Subcommittee on National Parks and Insular Affairs, (1977) H, R. 6268, 95th Congress, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 192 pp.

  25. US MAB (United States Program on Man and the Biosphere), (1979)Guidelines for the Selection of Biosphere Reserves: an interim report and key, US MAB, Washington, D.C. 26 pp.

Download references

Author information

Additional information

Dr Francis Roy Thibodeau graduated in Environmental Sciences from Boston College. He later took his Masters in Urban, Social and Environmental Policy, and his Doctorate in Ecology and Environmental Policy, both degrees from Tufts University. His research interests are in the field of relationship between ecology and land use, especially as they influence the preservation of genetic diversity.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thibodeau, F.R. National programs to protect genetic diversity — The US example. Environmentalist 3, 39–44 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02240043

Download citation

Keywords

  • Genetic Diversity
  • United States
  • Environmental Management
  • Nature Conservation
  • Full Range