, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 243–256 | Cite as

The biodiversity challenge: Expanded hot-spots analysis

  • Norman Myers


This paper aims to throw light on the mass extinction that is overtaking Earth's species. Using an analytic methodology developed for an earlier partial assessment, it focuses on a series of ‘hot-spot’ areas, these being areas that (a) feature exceptional concentrations of species with high levels of endemism, and (b) face exceptional threats of destruction. The paper identifies another eight such areas, four of them in tropical forests and four in Mediterranean-type zones. The analysis reveals that the four tropical-forest areas contain at least 2,835 endemic plant species in 18,700 km2, or 1.1 percent of Earth's plant species in 0.013 percent of Earth's land surface; and that the four Mediterranean-type areas contain 12,720 endemic plan: species in 435,700 km2, or 5.1 percent of Earth's plant species in 0.3 percent of the Earth's land surface. Taken together, these eight hot-spot areas contain 15,555 endemic plant species in 454,400 km2, or 6.2 percent of Earth's plant species in 0.3 percent of Earth's land surface. This is to be compared with the earlier hot-spots analysis of 10 tropical-forest areas, with 34,400 endemic plant species in 292,000 km2, or 13.8 percent of Earth's plant species in 0.2 percent of Earth's land surface.

Taking all 18 hot-spot areas together, we find they support 49,955 endemic plant species, or 20 percent of Earth's plant species, in 746,400 km2, or 0.5 percent of Earth's land surface. This means that one fifth of Earth's plant species are confined to half of one percent of the Earth's land surface — and they occur in habitats that are mostly threatened with imminent destruction.

By concentrating on these hot-spot areas where needs are greatest and where the pay-off from safeguard measures would be greatest, conservationists can engage in a more systematised response to the challenge of large scale impending extinctions.


Plant Species Environmental Management Nature Conservation Systematise Response Tropical Forest 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adis, J. 1990. 30 million arthropod species — too many or too few?Journal of Tropical Ecology,6, 115–118.Google Scholar
  2. Ahonzo, J. 1984.La Population de la Cote d'Ivoire. Direction de la Statistique, Abidjan, Ivory Coast.Google Scholar
  3. Arroyo, M.T.K. 1990. Personal communication, letter of July 30th, 1990. Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.Google Scholar
  4. Ashton, P.S. and Gunatilleke, C.V.S. 1987. New light on the plant geography of Ceylon. I. Historical plant geography.Journal of Biogeography,14, 249–285.Google Scholar
  5. Assi, A.L. 1988. Especes rares et en voie d'extinction de la flore de la Cote d'Ivoire. In: Goldblatt, P. and Lowry, P.P. (eds),Modern Systematic Studies in African Botany, 461–463. Missouri Botanical Garden, St Louis, Missouri, USA.Google Scholar
  6. Balasubramaniam, S. 1985. Tree flora of Sri Lanka. In: Jayatilleke, A. (ed.),Proceedings of International Conference on Timber Technology, 58–67, Moratuwa, Sri Lanka.Google Scholar
  7. Barbour, M. and Major, J. (eds). 1988.Terrestrial Vegetation of California. California Native Plants Society, San Francisco, California, USA.Google Scholar
  8. Bond, P. and Goldblatt, P. 1984. Plants of the Cape Flora.Journal of South African Botany, Supplement 13, 1–455.Google Scholar
  9. Bousquet, B. 1978. Un parc de foret dense en Afrique: le parc national de Tai (Cote d'Ivoire).Bois Forets Tropicales,179, 27–46.Google Scholar
  10. Brenan, J.P M. 1978. Some aspects of the phytogeography of tropical Africa.Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden,65, 437–478.Google Scholar
  11. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. 1988.California's Forests and Rangelands: Growing Conflict Over Changing Uses. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Sacramento, California, USA.Google Scholar
  12. Cody, M.L. and Mooney, H.A. 1978. Convergenceversus nonconvergence in Mediterranean-climate ecosystems.Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics,9, 265–321.Google Scholar
  13. Cody, M.L. 1986. Diversity, rarity and conservation in Mediterranean-climate regions. In: Soule, M.E. (ed.),Conservation Biology, 122–152. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass, USA.Google Scholar
  14. Collins, N.M., Sayer, J.A. and Whitmore, T. (eds). 1990.Conservation Atlas of Tropical Forests — Asia and the Pacific. Macmillan, London, UK for International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Gland, Switzerland, and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  15. Corporacion Nacional Forestal (de Chile). 1989.Redbook of Terrestrial Flora of Chile. Corporacion Nacional Forestal (de Chile), Santiago, Chile.Google Scholar
  16. Cowling, R.M. and Roux, P.W. (eds). 1982. The Karoo Biome: A preliminary synthesis.South African National Scientific Programme Report, 142, Pretoria, South Africa.Google Scholar
  17. Dayanandan, P. 1983. Conserving the flora of the Peninsular Hills.Bulletin of Botanical Survey of India,23, 250–253.Google Scholar
  18. Dosso, H., Guillaumet, J.L. and Hadley, M. 1981. The Tai Project: land use problems in a tropical rain forest.Ambio,10, 120–125.Google Scholar
  19. Elias, T.S. and Nelson, J. (eds). 1987.Conservation and Management of Rare and Endangered Plants. California Native Plants Society, San Francisco, California, USA.Google Scholar
  20. Erdelen, W. 1988. forest ecosystems and nature conservation in Sri Lanka.Biological Conservation,43, 115–135.Google Scholar
  21. Erwin, T.L. 1988. The tropical forest canopy: the heart of biotic diversity. In: Wilson, E.O. (ed.),Biodiversity, 105–109. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
  22. Fuenzalida, M. 1984.Evaluation of Native Forest Destruction in the Andes of South Central Chile: Conservation Alternatives. Comite Nacional pro Defensa de la Fauna Y Flora, Santiago, Chile.Google Scholar
  23. Gajardo, R. 1983.Sistema Basico de Clasificacion de la Vegetacion Nativa Chilena. Universidad de Chile/Corporacion Nacional Forestal, Santiago, Chile.Google Scholar
  24. Geiser, U. and Sommer, M. 1982. Up-to-date information on Sri Lanka's forest cover.Loris,16, 66–69.Google Scholar
  25. Gibbs-Russell, G.E. 1985. Analysis of the size and composition of the South African flora.Bothalia,15, 613–629.Google Scholar
  26. Gibbs-Russell, G.E. 1987. Preliminary floristic analysis of the major biomes in Southern Africa.Bothalia,17, 213–227.Google Scholar
  27. Goldblatt, P. 1978. An analysis of the flora of Southern Africa: its characteristics, relationships and origins.Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden,65, 369–436.Google Scholar
  28. Gomez-Campo, (ed.). 1985.Plant Conservation in the Mediterranean Area. W. Junk, Dordrecht, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  29. Guillaumet, J.L. 1984. The vegetation: an extraordinary diversity. In: Jolly, al., (eds),Key Environments: Madagascar, 27–54. Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  30. Gunatilleke, C.V.S. and Ashton, P.S. 1987. New light on the plant geography of Ceylon. II. The ecological biogeography of the endemic lowland flora.Journal of Biogeography,14, 295–327.Google Scholar
  31. Gunatilleke, C.V.S. and Gunatilleke, I.U.N. 1985. Phytosociology of Sinharaja — Contribution to rain forests conservation in Sri Lanka.Biological Conservation,31, 21–40.Google Scholar
  32. Hall, A.V. 1987. Threatened plants in the Fynbos and Karoo Biomes, South Africa.Biological Conservation,40, 29–52.Google Scholar
  33. Hamilton, A.C. 1976. The significance of patterns of distribution shown by forests plants and animals in tropical Africa for the reconstruction of Upper Pleistocene and palaeoenvironments: a review. In: Van Zinderen Bakker, E.M. (ed.),Palaeocology of Africa, the Surrounding Islands, and Antarctica, pp.63–97. Balkema Press, Cape Town, South Africa.Google Scholar
  34. Hawthorne, W.D. 1984. Ecological and biogeographical patterns in the coastal forests of East Africa. PhD Thesis, University of Oxford, Oxford. UK.Google Scholar
  35. Henly, P. 1977. The Mediterranean: a threatened microcosm.Ambio,6, 300–307.Google Scholar
  36. Hopper, S.D. 1983. Applied plant systematics: case studies in the conservation of rare Western Australian flora.Australian Systematics Botanical Society Newsletter,35, 1–6.Google Scholar
  37. Hopper, S.D. and Muir, B.G. 1984. Conservation of the Kwongan. In: Pate, J.S. and Beard, J.S. (eds),Kwongan — Plant Life of the Sandplain, pp.253–266. University of Western Australia Press, Nedlands, Western Australia.Google Scholar
  38. Ishwaran, N. and Erdelen, W. 1990. Conserving Sinharaja — an experiment in sustainable development in Sri Lanka.Ambio,19, 237–244.Google Scholar
  39. Jain, S.K. and Sastri, A.R.K. 1983.A Catalogue of Threatened Plants of India. Department of the Environment, Government of India, New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
  40. Jarman, M.L. 1986. Conservation priorities in the lowland regions of the Fynbos Biome.South African National Scientific Programmes Report No 87. Cooperative Scientific Programs, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Pretoria, South Africa.Google Scholar
  41. Jones and Stokes Associates. 1987.Sliding Toward Extinction: the State of California's Natural Heritage. California Nature Conservancy, San Francisco, California, USA.Google Scholar
  42. Keeley, J.E. (ed.). 1988.Bibliographies on Chaparral and the Phyto-ecology of other Mediterranean Systems. California Water Resources Centre, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.Google Scholar
  43. Kendrick, K. 1989. India. In: Campbell, D.G. and Hammond, H.D. (eds),Floristic Inventory of Tropical Countries, pp.133–140. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  44. Le Houerou, H.N. 1977. Man and Desertisation in the Mediterranean Region.Ambio,6, 363–365.Google Scholar
  45. Lisboa, P.L.B., Maciel, U.N. and Prance, G.T. 1989.Some Effects of Colonisation on the Tropical Flora of Amazonia: a Case Study from Rondonia. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, UK.Google Scholar
  46. Lovett, J.C. 1987. Endemism and affinities of the Tanzanian montane forests.Monograph in Systematic Botany, Missouri Botanical Garden, St Louis, Missouri, USA.Google Scholar
  47. Lovett, J.C. 1988. Practical aspects of moist forest conservation in Tanzania. In: Goldblatt, P. and Lowry, P.P (eds), Modern Systematic Studies in African Botany.Monographs in Systematic Botany,25, 491–496.Google Scholar
  48. Lovett, J.C. 1989. Tanzania. In: Campbell, D.G. and Hammond, H.D. (eds),Floristic Inventory of Tropical Countries, pp.232–235. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  49. Maitre, H. 1987. Natural forest management in Cote d'Ivoire.Unasylva,39, 53–60.Google Scholar
  50. Marticorena, C. 1980.Threatened Plants and Areas of Chile. Universidad de Concepcion, Santiago, Chile.Google Scholar
  51. Mittermeier, R.A. 1988. Primate diversity and the tropical forest: case studies from Brazil and Madagascar and the importance of the megadiversity countries. In: Wilson, E.O. (ed.),Biodiversity, pp.145–154. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
  52. Moll, E.J. and Bossi, L. 1984. Assessment of the extent of the natural vegetation of the Fynbos Biome of South Africa.South African Journal of Science,80, 355–358.Google Scholar
  53. Moll, E.J. and Jarman, M.L. 1984. Clarification of the term Fynbos.South African Journal of Sciences,80, 351–352.Google Scholar
  54. Munni, N.V. and Naidu, K.S.M. 1988.Monitoring Changes in Forest Vegetation Cover in the Western Ghats through Satellite Remote Sensing. National Remote Sensing Agency, Balanagar, Hyderabad, India.Google Scholar
  55. Myers, N. 1982. Forest refuges and conservation in Africa — with some appraisal of survival prospects for tropical moist forests throughout the biome. In: Prance, G.T. (ed.),Biological Diversification in the Tropics, pp.658–672. Columbia University Press, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  56. Myers, N. 1988. Threatened biotas: ‘hot-spots’ in tropical forests.The Environmentalist,8, 187–208.Google Scholar
  57. Myers, N. 1989.Deforestation Rates in Tropical Forests and their Climatic Implications. Friends of the Earth, London, UK.Google Scholar
  58. Nair, K.S.S., Gnanaharan, R. and Kedharnath, S. (eds). 1986.Ecodevelopment of the Western Ghats. Kerala Research Institute, Peechi, Kerala, India.Google Scholar
  59. Nanayakkara, V.R. 1982. Forests — policies and strategies for conservation and development.Sri lanka Forester,15, 75–79.Google Scholar
  60. Nayar, M.P. and Sastry, A.R.K. (eds). 1987.Red Data Book of Indian Plants. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Gland, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  61. O'Neill, C.J. 1990. Personal communication, letter of August 22nd, 1990, citing a number of references. UCI Arboretum, University of California, Irvine, California, USA.Google Scholar
  62. Oppenheimer, M. and Boyle, R.H. 1990.Dead Heat: the Race Against the Greenhouse Effect. Basic Books Inc, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  63. Pate, J.S and Beard, J.S. (eds). 1984.Kwongan — Plant Life of the Sandplain. University of Western Australia Press, Nedlands, Australia.Google Scholar
  64. Peters, R.L. (ed.). 1991.Consequences of the Greenhouse Warming to biodiversity. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, USA (in press).Google Scholar
  65. Pizarro, M. 1977. Threatened and endangered species of plants in Chile. In: Prance, G.T. and Elias, T.S. (eds),Extinction is Forever, pp.267–282. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  66. Poblete, I.C. (ed.). 1985.Flora Nativa Arborea y Arbustiva de Chile Amenazada de Extinction. Ministry of Agriculture, Santiago, Chile.Google Scholar
  67. Polhill, R.M. 1989. East Africa (Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda). In: Campbell, D.G. and Hammond, H.D. (eds),Floristic Inventory of Tropical Countries, pp.217–231. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  68. Ramirez, C. 1984.Bibliografia Vegetacional de Chile. Universidad Austral, Valdivia, Chile.Google Scholar
  69. Raven, P.H. 1976. Ethics and attitudes. In: Simmons, J.B., Beyer, R.I., Brandham, P.E., Lucas, G.L. and Parry, U.T.H. (eds),Conservation of Threatened Plants, pp.155–179. Plenum Press, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  70. Raven, P.H. and Axelrod, D.I. 1978. Origin and relationships of the California flora.University of California Publications in Botany,72, 1–134.Google Scholar
  71. Rodgers, W.A. and Hall, J.B. 1986. Pole cutting pressure in Tanzanian forests.Forestry Ecology and management,14, 133–140.Google Scholar
  72. Rodgers, W.A., Mziray, W. and Shishira, W. 1986.The Extent of Forest Cover in Tanzania using Satellite Imagery. Department of Natural Resources, University of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.Google Scholar
  73. Rodgers, W.A. and Homewood, K.M. 1982. Species richness and endemism in the Usambara mountain forests, Tanzania.Biological Journal of the Linnean Society,18, 197–242.Google Scholar
  74. Roth, H.H. 1984. We all want the trees: resource conflict in the Tai National Park, Ivory Coast. In: McNeely, J.A. and Miller, K.R., (eds),National Parks Conservation and Development: the Role of Protected Areas in Sustaining Society, pp.127–129. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington Press, USA.Google Scholar
  75. Rutherford, M.C. and Westfall, R.H. 1986. Biomes of Southern Africa: an objective categorisation.Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa,54, 1–98.Google Scholar
  76. Rye, B.L. 1982.Geographically Restricted Plants of Southern Western Australia. Department of Fisheries and Wildlife of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.Google Scholar
  77. Rye, B.L. and Hopper, S.D. 1981.A Guide to the Gazetted Rare Flora of Western Australia. Department of Fisheries and Wildlife of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.Google Scholar
  78. Schneider, S.H. 1989.Global Warming: are we Entering the Greenhouse Century? Sierra Club Books, San Francisco, California, USA.Google Scholar
  79. Smith, J.P. 1987. California: leader in endangered plant protection.Fremontia,15, 3–7.Google Scholar
  80. Smith, J.P. and Berg, K. (eds). 1988.Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California. California native Plants Society, Sacramento, California, USA.Google Scholar
  81. Soule, M.E. (ed.). 1987.Viable Populations for Conservation. Cambridge University Press, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  82. Spears, J. 1985.Malaysia Agricultural Sector Assessment Mission: Forestry Subsector Discussion paper. The World Bank, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
  83. Stebbins, G.L. 1980. Rarity of plant species: a synthetic viewpoint.Rhodora,82, 77–86.Google Scholar
  84. Stebbins, G.L. and Major, J. 1965. Endemism and speciation in the California flora.Ecological Monographs,35, 1–35.Google Scholar
  85. Stork, M.E. 1988. Insect diversity: facts, fiction and speculation.Biological Journal of the Linnean Society,35, 321–337.Google Scholar
  86. Sumithraarachchi, D.B. 1989. Sri Lankan forests: diversity and genetic resources. In: Holm-Nielsen, L.B, Nielsen, I.C. and Balslev, H. (eds),Tropical Forests: Botanical Dynamics, Speciation and Diversity, pp.253–258. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  87. Tansley, S.A. 1988. The status of threatened Proteaceae in the Cape Flora, South Africa and the implications for their conservation.Biological Conservation,43, 227–239.Google Scholar
  88. Werger, M.J.A. (ed.). 1987.Biogeography and Ecology of Southern Africa. W Junk Publishers, The Hague, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  89. Werner, W.L. 1982. The upper montane rain forests of Sri Lanka.Sri Lanka Forester,15, 119–135.Google Scholar
  90. World Conservation Monitoring Centre. 1988.India: Conservation of Biological Diversity. World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science and Technology Letters 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Norman Myers
    • 1
  1. 1.Upper MeadowHeadington, OxfordUK

Personalised recommendations