PURPOSE: For precise diagnosis and rational treatment of the increasing number of patients with descent of intrapelvic organ(s) and anatomic plane(s), dynamic contrast roentgenography of multiple intrapelvic organs and planes is described. METHODS: Sixty-six patients, consisting of 11 males, with a mean age (± standard deviation) of 65.6±14.2 years and with chief complaints of intrapelvic organ and perineal descent or defecation problems, were examined in this study. Dynamic contrast roentgenography was obtained by opacifying the ileum, urinary bladder, vagina, rectum, and the perineum. Films were taken at both squeeze and strain phases. On the films the lowest points of each organ and plane were plotted, and the distances from the standard line drawn at the upper surface of the sacrum were measured. The values were corrected to percentages according to the height of the sacrococcygeal bone of each patient. From these corrected values, organ or plane descents at strain and squeeze were diagnosed and graphically demonstrated as a descentgram in each patient. RESULTS: Among 17 cases with subjective symptoms of bladder descent, 9 cases (52.9 percent) showed roentgenographic descent. By the same token, among the cases with subjective feeling of descent of the vagina, uterus, peritoneum, perineum, rectum, and anus, roentgenographic descent was confirmed in 15 of 20 (75 percent), 7 of 9 (77.8 percent), 6 of 16 (37.5 percent), 33 of 33 (100 percent), 25 of 37 (67.6 percent), and 22 of 36 (61.6 percent), respectively. The descentgrams were divided into three patterns: anorectal descent type, female genital descent type, and total organ descent type. CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic contrast roentgenography and successive descentgraphy of multiple intrapelvic organs and planes are useful for objective diagnosis and rational treatment of patients with descent disorders of the intrapelvic organ(s) and plane(s).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Redding MD. The relaxed perineum and anorectal disease revisited. Dis Colon Rectum 1973;16:56–8.
Parks AG, Porter NH, Hardcastle J. The syndrome of the descending perineum. J R Soc Med 1966;59:477–82.
Birnbaum EH, Stamm L, Rafferty JF, Fry RD, Kodener IJ, Fleshman JW. Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency influences surgical outcome in treatment of rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:1215–21.
Bartolo DC, Roe AM, Mortensen NJ. The relationship between perineal descent and denervation of the puborectalis in continent patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 1986;1:91–5.
Jacobs PP, Scheuer M, Kuijpers JH, Vingerhoets MH. Obstetric fecal incontinence: role of pelvic floor denervation and results of delayed sphincter repair. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:494–7.
Snooks SJ, Swash M, Henry MM, Setchell M. Risk factors in childbirth causing damage to the pelvic floor innervation. Int J Colorectal Dis 1986;1:20–4.
Siproudhis L, Ropert A, Lucas J,et al. Defecatory disorders, anorectal and pelvic floor dysfunction: a polygamy? Int J Colorectal Dis 1992;7:102–7.
Eckardt VF, Kanzler G. How reliable is digital examination for the evaluation of anal sphincter tone? Int J Colorectal Dis 1993;8:95–7.
Piloni V, Ascoli G, Amadio L, Marmorale C, Catalini G. Ano-rectal manometry and defecography: correlation in 54 Patients with faecal incontinence. Colo-proctology 1990;4:218–24.
Hock D, Lombard R, Jehaes C,et al. Colpocystodefecography. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:1015–21.
Salzano F, Salvo E, Giamundo P, Salzano A, Grassi R, Romano G. Dynamic assessment of pelvic floor disorders by cineradiography. Colo-proctology 1989;4:240–2.
Yoshioka K, Hyland G, Keighley MR. Anorectal function after abdominal rectopexy: parameters of predictive value in identifying return of continence. Br J Surg 1989;76:64–8.
Sentovich SM, Rivela LJ, Thorson AG, Christensen MA, Blatchford GJ. Simultaneous dynamic proctography and peritoneography for pelvic floor disorders. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:912–5.
Mellgren A, Johansson C, Dolk A, Anzen B, Bremmer S, Nilsson BY, Holmström B. Enterocele demonstrated by defecography in associated with other pelvic floor disorders. Int J Colorectal Dis 1994;9:121–4.
Altringer WE, Saclarides TJ, Dominguez JM, Brubaker LT, Smith CS. Four-contrast defecography: pelvic “floor-oscopy.” Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:695–9.
Shorvon PJ, McHugh S, Diamant NE, Somers S, Stevenson GW. Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications. Gut 1989;30:1737–49.
Selvaggi F, Pesce G, Scotto Di Garlo E, Maffettone V, Canonico S. Evaluation of normal subjects by defecographic technique. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:698–702.
Wald A, Caruana BJ, Freimanis MG, Bauman DH, Hinds JP. Contributions of evacuation proctography and anorectal manometry to evaluation of adults with constipation and defecatory disorders. Dig Dis Sci 1990;35:481–7.
Miller R, Bartolo DC, Cervero F, Mortensen NJ. Differences in anal sensation in continent and incontinent patients with perineal descent. Int J Colorectal Dis 1989;4:45–9.
Touchais Y, Ducrotte P, Weber J,et al. Relationship between results of radiologic pelvic floor study and anorectal manometry in patients constipation. Int J Colorectal Dis 1988;3:53–8.
Turnbull GK. Bartram CI, Lennard-Jones JE. Radiologic studies of rectal evacuation in adults with idiopathic constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 1988;31:190–7.
Skomorowska E, Hegedus V, Christiansen J. Evaluation of perineal descent by defecography. Int J Colorectal Dis 1988;3:191–4.
About this article
Cite this article
Takano, M., Hamada, A. Evaluation of pelvic descent disorders by dynamic contrast roentgenography. Dis Colon Rectum 43, S6–S11 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02237219
- Rectal prolapse
- Prolapse of the bladder
- Uterine prolapse
- Descent of intrapelvic organs
- Perineal descent
- Peritoneal descent