Advertisement

Environmentalist

, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 111–121 | Cite as

Third world sanitation options — the Zambian case

  • David M. Todd
Article
  • 60 Downloads

Summary

Water-borne sanitation it too expensive to install in low cost urban housing areas in the Third World, and interest has turned to various inexpensive ‘alternative’ systems. In the Zambian context, such systems must be cheap to install, and require a minimum of maintenance, which must be of low complexity.

After examining a wide range of systems, the author concludes that three unlined and three lined toilet types are suitable for trial installation in peripheral and central low cost housing areas respectively. A strategy for conducting tests is outlined and the importance of organisational and community development emphasized.

Keywords

Environmental Management Nature Conservation Community Development Economic Geology Cost Housing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bamberger, M., Sanyal, B., and Valverde, N. (1982)Evaluation of Sites and Services Projects; The Experience from Lusaka, Zambia. World Bank Staff Working Papers, 548. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  2. Botswana Ministry of Local Government and Lands (1976)Low Cost Sanitation Research Project — Preliminary Report. Gaborone.Google Scholar
  3. Department of Town and Country Planning (1972)Low Cost Residential Development in Lusaka. Lusaka.Google Scholar
  4. Feachem, R., McGarry, M., and Mara, D. (1978)Water, Wastes and Health in Hot Climates. English Language Book Society, and John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
  5. Heisler, H. (1974)Urbanization and the Government of Migration: The Inter-relation of Urban and Rural Life in Zambia. Hurst, P., and Co., London.Google Scholar
  6. Hoek-Smit, M. (1982)Community Participation in Squatter Upgrading in Zambia. American Friends Service Committee, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  7. International Labour Office (1981)Basic Needs in an Economy Under Pressure. Jobs and Skills Programme For Africa, Addis Ababa.Google Scholar
  8. Kalbermatten, J., Julius, De Anne., and Gunnerson, C. (1982)Appropriate Sanitation Alternatives — A Technical and Economic Appraisal. World Bank Studies in Water Supply and Sanitation, 1, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  9. de Kruijff, G. (1978)Aqua Privy Sewerage Systems. A Survey of Some Schemes in Zambia. Housing Research and Development Unit, Nairobi.Google Scholar
  10. Lusaka Housing Project Evaluation Team (1977)George 1976, Initial Results of the First Primary Sample Survey. Working Paper Number 4, Mimeo, Lusaka.Google Scholar
  11. Mara, D. (1978)Wastewater Treatment in Hot Climates. In Feachemet al. Op. cit., pp. 264–282.Google Scholar
  12. Marais, G. Van R. (1978)Sanitation and Low Cost Housing. In Feachemet al. Op. cit., pp. 231–238.Google Scholar
  13. McGarry, M. (1978)Waste Collection in Hot Climates: A Technical and Economic Appraisal. In Feachemet al. Op. cit., pp. 239–264.Google Scholar
  14. Middleton, R. N. (1980)Trials of Equipment For Pit Latrine Emptying. (Draft). World Bank. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  15. Ministry of Development Planning and National Guidance (1971)Second National Development Plan. Lusaka.Google Scholar
  16. National Commission For Development Planning (1979)Third National Development Plan. Lusaka.Google Scholar
  17. National Housing Authority (1979)Urban Sanitation Survey. Lusaka.Google Scholar
  18. Nimpuno, K. (1976)Sewage Disposal in Developing Countries, A Survey of Methods. Mimeo. Gothenburg.Google Scholar
  19. Office of National Development and Planning (1966)First National Development Plan. Lusaka.Google Scholar
  20. Rakodi, C. (1981) Participation in Squatter Upgrading in Lusaka, Zambia. In Rakodi, C., and Schlyter, A. (eds.),Upgrading in Lusaka — Participation and Physical Changes. The National Swedish Institute For Building Research. Gavle.Google Scholar
  21. Tanzania National Scientific Research Council (1978)Alternative Waste Disposal Methods Project — Final Report. Dar-Es-Salaam.Google Scholar
  22. Todd, D., and Mulimbwa, A. (1980)An Evaluation of the Legal Framework of Public Participation in the Management of Human Settlements in Zambia. Institute for African Studies/Unesco. Mimeo. Lusaka.Google Scholar
  23. Vincent, L. J., Algie, W. E., and Van Marais, R. (1961)A System of Sanitation For Low Cost High Density Housing. African Housing Board, Lusaka.Google Scholar
  24. World Bank (1982)Appropriate Sanitation Alternatives. A Technical and Economic Appraisal. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  25. World Bank/World Health Organization (1975)Zambia: Water Supply and Sewerage Sector Study, (2 Vols.). Lusaka.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science and Technology Letters 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • David M. Todd
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Environmental StudiesUniversity of Zambia at NdolaKitweZambia

Personalised recommendations