PURPOSE: Anal incontinence affects approximately 10 percent of adult females. Damage to the anal sphincters has been considered as the cause of anal incontinence after childbirth in the sole prospective study so far available. The aims of the present study were to determine prospectively the incidence of anal incontinence and anal sphincter damage after childbirth and their relationship with obstetric parameters. METHODS: We studied 259 consecutive females six weeks before and eight weeks after delivery. They were asked to fill in a questionnaire assessing fecal incontinence. Anal endosonography (7–10 MHz) was then performed. Two independent observers analyzed internal and external anal sphincters. RESULTS: A total of 233 patients (90 percent) were assessed, of whom 31 had cesarean section.De novo sphincter defects were observed in 16.7 percent (14 percent external, 1.7 percent internal, and 1 percent both) in the postpartum period only after vaginal delivery. These disruptions occurred with the same incidence after the first and the second childbirth. Independent risk factors (odds ratio; 95 percent confidence interval) for sphincter defect were forceps (12; 4–20), perineal tears (16; 9–25), episiotomy (6.6; 5–17), and parity (8.8; 4–19) as revealed by multivariate analyses. The overall rate of anal incontinence was 9 percent and independent risk factors (odds ratio; 95 percent confidence interval) involved forceps (4.5; 1.5–13), perineal tears (3.9; 1.4–10.9), sphincter defect (5.5; 5–15), and prolonged labor (3.4; 1–11). Among these patients only 45 percent had sphincter defects. CONCLUSION: Anal incontinence after delivery is multifactorial, and anal sphincter defects account for only 45 percent of them. Primiparous and secundiparous patients have the same risk factors for sphincter disruption and anal incontinence. Because external anal sphincter disruptions are more frequent than internal anal sphincter damage, surgical repair should be discussed in symptomatic patients.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Crawford LA, Quint EH, Pearl ML, De Lancey JO. Incontinence following rupture of the anal sphincter during delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1993;82:527–31.
Johanson JF, Lafferty J. Epidemiology of fecal incontinence: the silent affliction. Am J Gastroenterol 1996;91:33–6.
Kamm M. Obstetric damage and fecal incontinence. Lancet 1994;344:730–3.
Law PJ, Kamm MA, Bartram CL. Anal endosonography in the investigation of fecal incontinence. Br J Surg 1991;78:312–4.
Fornell EK, Berg G, Hallböök O, Matthiesen LS, Sjödahl R. Clinical consequences of anal sphincter rupture during vaginal delivery. J Am Coll Surg 1996;183:553–8.
Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson NH, Thomas JM, Bartram CI. Anal-sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery. N Engl J Med 1993;329:1905–11.
MacArthur C, Bick DE, Keighley MR. Faecal incontinence after childbirth. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;104:46–50.
Bek KM, Laurberg S. Risks of anal incontinence from subsequent vaginal delivery after complete obstetric anal sphincter tear. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992;99:724–6.
Combs A, Robertson P, Laros R. Risk factors for third-degree and fourth-degree perineal lacerations in forceps and vacuum deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;163:100–4.
Snooks SJ, Swash M, Setchell M, Henry MM. Injury to innervation of pelvic floor sphincter musculature in childbirth. Lancet 1984;2:546–50.
Bartram CI. Echoendoscopie anale. Acta Endoscopica 1994;24:63–6.
Benson JT, Sumners JE, Pittman JS. Definition of normal female pelvic floor anatomy using ultrasonographic techniques. J Clin Ultrasound 1991;19:275–82.
Deen KI, Kumar D, Williams JG, Ollif J, Keighley MR. Anal sphincter defects. Correlation between endoanal ultrasound and surgery. Ann Surg 1993;218:201–5.
Law PJ, Bartram CL. Anal endosonography: technique and normal anatomy. Gastrointest Radiol 1989;14:349–53.
Sultan AH, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Beynon J, Bartram CI. Anal endosonography and correlation with in vitro and in vivo anatomy. Br J Surg 1993;80:508–11.
Woolley RJ. Benefits and risks of episiotomy. A review of the English-language literature since 1980. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1995;50(Parts 1 and 2):806–35.
Burnett SD, Spence-Jones C, Speakman CT, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Bartram CI. Unsuspected sphincter damage following childbirth revealed by anal endosonography. Br J Radiol 1991;64:225–7.
Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Bartram CI, Hudson CN. Anal sphincter trauma during instrumental delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1993;43:263–70.
Supported financially by Beaufour Laboratories and logistically by Bruel & Kjaer Medical Company.
About this article
Cite this article
Abramowitz, L., Sobhani, I., Ganansia, R. et al. Are sphincter defects the cause of anal incontinence after vaginal delivery?. Dis Colon Rectum 43, 590–596 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02235567
- Anal incontinence
- Sphincter disruption