Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

, Volume 44, Issue 7, pp 936–941 | Cite as

Initial nonoperative management for periappendiceal abscess

  • David Oliak
  • Dan Yamini
  • Vikram M. Udani
  • Roger J. Lewis
  • Tracey Arnell
  • Hernan Vargas
  • Michael J. Stamos
Original Contributions
  • 204 Downloads

Abstract

PURPOSE: Our goal was to compare initial operative and nonoperative management for periappendiceal abscess complicating appendicitis. METHODS: This study is a retrospective review of 155 consecutive patients with appendicitis complicated by periappendiceal abscess treated between 1992 and 1998. Eighty-eight patients were treated initially nonoperatively, and 67 patients were treated operatively. All patients had localized abdominal tenderness and either computed tomography or intraoperative documentation of an abscess. RESULTS: Our patient population consisted of 107 males and 48 females, with an average age of 33 (range, 16–75) years. Age, gender, comorbidity, white blood cell count, temperature, and heart rate did not differ significantly between groups. For the initial nonoperative management group, the failure rate was 5.8 percent and the appendicitis recurrence rate was 8 percent after a mean follow-up of 36 weeks. The response to treatment of the initial nonoperative group and the initial operative group was compared by length of stay (9±5 daysvs. 9±3 days;P=not significant), days until white blood cell count normalized (3.8±4 daysvs. 3.1±3 days;P=not significant), days until temperature normalized (3.2±3 daysvs. 3.1±2 days;P=not significant), and days until a regular diet was tolerated (4.7±4 daysvs. 4.6±3 days;P=not significant). Complication rate was significantly lower in the nonoperative group (17vs. 36 percent;P=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Initial nonoperative management of appendicitis complicated by periappendiceal abscess is safe and effective. Patients undergoing initial nonoperative management have a lower rate of complications, but they are at risk for recurrent appendicitis.

Key words

Appendicitis Treatment Complications Interval appendectomy Percutaneous abscess drainage 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Fitz RH. Perforating inflammation of the vermiform appendix with special reference to its early diagnosis and treatment. Am J Med Sci 1886;92:321–46.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    McBurney C. Experiences with early operative interference in cases of disease of the vermiform appendix. N Y Med J 1889;50:676–84.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Condon RE. Appendicitis. In: Sabiston DC Jr, ed. Textbook of surgery. 10th ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1972.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Allen JG. Appendicitis, peritonitis, and intra-abdominal abscesses. In: Rhoads JE, Allen JG, Harkins HN,et al., eds. Surgery principles and practice. 4th ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1970.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bradley EL III, Isaacs J. Appendiceal abscess revisited. Arch Surg 1978;113:1144–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Paull DL, Bloom P. Appendiceal abscess. Arch Surg 1982;117:1017–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jordan JS, Kovalcik PJ, Schwab CW. Appendicits with a palpable mass. Ann Surg 1981;193:227–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    McPherson A, Kinmonth J. Acute appendicitis and the appendix mass. Br J Surg 1945;32:365–70.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thomas DR. Conservative management of the appendix mass. Surgery 1973;73:677–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Skoubo-Kristensen E, Hvid I. The appendiceal mass: results of conservative management. Ann Surg 1982;196:584–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mosegaard A, Nielsen OS. Interval appendectomy: a retrospective study. Acta Chir Scand 1979;145:109–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bagi P, Dueholm S. Nonoperative management of the ultrasonically evaluated appendiceal mass. Surgery 1987;101:602–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hoffman J, Lindhard A, Jensen HE. Appendix mass: conservative management without interval appendectomy. Am J Surg 1984;148:379–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nitecki S, Assalia A, Schein M. Contemporary management of the appendiceal mass. Br J Surg 1993;80:18–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Balthazar EJ, Birnbaum BA, Yee J, Megibow AJ, Roshkow J, Gray C. Acute appendicitis: CT and US correlation in 100 patients. Radiology 1994;190:31–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lane MJ, Katz DS, Ross BA, Clautice-Engle TL, Mindelzun RE, Jeffrey RB. Unenhanced helical CT for suspected acute appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;168:405–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA,et al. Helical CT technique for the diagnosis of appendicitis: prospective evaluation of a focused appendix CT examination. Radiology 1997;202:139–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA. Sensitivity and specificity of the individual CT signs of appendicitis: experience with 200 helical appendiceal CT examinations. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997;21:686–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gale ME, Birnbaum S, Stephen GG, Sloan G, Johnson W, Robbins AH. CT appearance of appendicitis and its local complications. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1985;9:34–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Balthazar EJ, Megibow AJ, Hulnick D, Gordon RB, Naidich DP, Beranbaum ER. CT of appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1986;147:705–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rao PM, Mueller PR. Clinical and pathologic variants of appendiceal disease: CT features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;170:1335–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA. Appendiceal and periappendiceal air at CT: prevalence, appearance and clinical significance. Clin Radiol 1997;52:750–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Oliak D, Sinow R, French S, Udani VM, Stamos MJ. Computed tomography scanning for the diagnosis of perforated appendicitis. Am Surg 1999;65:959–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    van Sonnenberg E, Wittich GR, Casola G,et al. Periappendiceal abscesses: percutaneous drainage. Radiology 1987;163:23–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Flancbaum L, Nosher JL, Brolin RE. Percutaneous catheter drainage of abdominal abscesses associated with perforated viscus. Am Surg 1990;56:52–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vargas HI, Averbook A, Stamos MJ. Appendiceal mass: conservative therapy followed by interval laparoscopic appendectomy. Am Surg 1994;60:753–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yamini D, Vargas H, Bongard F, Klein S, Stamos M. Perforated appendicitis: is it truly a surgical urgency? Am Surg 1998;64:970–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Oliak D, Yamini D, Udani VM,et al. Nonoperative management for perforated appendicitis without periappendiceal mass. Am J Surg 2000;182:1382–8.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Verwaal VJ, Wobbes T, Goris RJ. Is there still a place for interval appendectomy? Dig Surg 1993;10:285–8.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Oliak
    • 1
  • Dan Yamini
    • 1
  • Vikram M. Udani
    • 1
  • Roger J. Lewis
    • 2
  • Tracey Arnell
    • 1
  • Hernan Vargas
    • 1
  • Michael J. Stamos
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.From the Department of SurgeryHarbor-UCLA Medical CenterTorrance
  2. 2.Department of Emergency MedicineHarbor-UCLA Medical CenterTorrance
  3. 3.Division of Colon and Rectal SurgeryTorrance

Personalised recommendations