Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Reproducibility of colonic transit study in patients with chronic constipation

Abstract

PURPOSE: Major therapeutic decisions are rendered based on a single colonic transit study. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the reproducibility of colonic transit time in patients with chronic constipation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-one patients with chronic idiopathic constipation were randomly selected to undergo two separate colonic transit tests. All clinical conditions, methodology, and patients' instructions were identical on both occasions. The gamma rate (linear correlation analysis) was undertaken between the first and second colonic transit times. Groups were divided according to the diagnoses of colonic inertia (slow-transit constipation), paradoxical puborectalis contraction, and chronic idiopathic constipation (normal-transit constipation). RESULTS: In 35 of 51 patients (69 percent), the results were identical between the two studies; however, in 16 patients (31 percent), the results were disparate (gamma correlation coefficient =0.53;P<0.01). The specific correlation coefficients for patients with colonic inertia, paradoxical puborectalis contraction, and chronic idiopathic constipation were 0.12, 0.21, and 0.60 (P<0.01), respectively. Moreover, the success rate of colectomy for colonic inertia was significantly higher in patients who underwent a repeat transit study confirming inertia than in patients who underwent colectomy based on a single study. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, colonic transit time is reproducible in patients with chronic constipation. The correlation coefficient is best for patients with idiopathic constipation and worst for patients with colonic inertia. This new finding suggests that suboptimal surgical outcome may be attributable to inaccurate diagnosis. Because of this poor correlation coefficient, in patients with colonic inertia, consideration should be given to repeating the colonic transit study before colectomy to help secure the diagnosis and improve outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.

    Drossman DA, Sandler RS, McKee DC, Lovitz AJ. Bowel patterns among subjects not seeking health care. Gastroenterology 1982;83:529–34.

  2. 2.

    Whitehead WE, Chaussade S, Corazziari E, Kumar D. Report of an international workshop on management of constipation. Int Gastroenterol 1991;4:99–113.

  3. 3.

    Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD. Biofeedback for nonrelaxing puborectalis syndrome. Semin Colon Rectal Surg 1992;3:120–4.

  4. 4.

    Wexner SD, Bartolo DC, eds. Constipation: etiology, evaluation, and management. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1996.

  5. 5.

    Jorge JM, Wexner SD, Ehrenpreis ED. The lactulose hydrogen breath test as a measure of orocaecal transit time. Eur J Surg 1994;160:409–16.

  6. 6.

    Heymen S, Wexner SD, Gulledge AD. MMPI assessment of patients with functional bowel disorders. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:593–6.

  7. 7.

    Maleki D, Camilleri M, Burton DD,et al. Pilot study of pathophysiology of constipation among community diabetics. Dig Dis Sci 1998;43:2373–8.

  8. 8.

    Stivland T, Camilleri M, Vassallo M,et al. Scintigraphic measurement of regional gut transit in idiopathic constipation. Gastroenterology 1991;101:107–15.

  9. 9.

    Kamm MA, Lennard-Jones JE. Rectal mucosal electrosensory testing—evidence for a rectal sensory neuropathy in idiopathic constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:419–23.

  10. 10.

    Beck DE, Wexner SD, eds. Fundamentals of anorectal surgery. 2nd ed. London: WB Saunders, 1998.

  11. 11.

    Pemberton JH, Rath DM, Ilstrup DM. Evaluation and surgical treatment of severe chronic constipation. Ann Surg 1991;214:403–13.

  12. 12.

    Gilliland R, Heymen S, Altomare DF, Park UC, Vickers D, Wexner SD. Outcome and predictors of success of biofeedback for constipation. Br J Surg 1997;84:1123–6.

  13. 13.

    Joo JS, Agachan F, Wolff B, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD. Initial North American experience with botulinum toxin type A for treatment of anismus. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:1107–11.

  14. 14.

    Hallan RI, Williams NS, Melling J, Waldron DJ, Womack NR, Morrison JF. Treatment of anismus in intractable constipation with botulinum A toxin. Lancet 1988;24:2:714–7.

  15. 15.

    Glia A, Gylin M, Gullberg K, Lindberg G. Biofeedback retraining in patients with functional constipation and paradoxical puborectalis contraction: comparison of anal manometry and sphincter electromyography for feedback. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:889–95.

  16. 16.

    Lubowski DZ, Chen FC, Kennedy ML, King DW. Results of colectomy for severe slow transit constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:23–9.

  17. 17.

    Piccirillo MF, Reissman P, Wexner SD. Colectomy as treatment for constipation in selected patients. Br J Surg 1995;82:898–901.

  18. 18.

    Pluta H, Bowes KL, Jewell LD. Long-term results of total abdominal colectomy for chronic idiopathic constipation: value of preoperative assessment. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:160–6.

  19. 19.

    Devroede G. Constipation. In: Sleisenger MH, Fordtran J, eds. Gastrointestinal disease: pathophysiology, diagnosis, treatment. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1988:331–68.

  20. 20.

    Walsh PV, Peebles-Brown G, Watkinson G. Colectomy for slow transit constipation. Ann R Coll Surg 1987;69:71–5.

  21. 21.

    Vasilevsky CA, Nemer FD, Balcos EG, Christenson CE, Goldberg SM. Is subtotal colectomy a viable option in the management of chronic constipation? Dis Colon Rectum 1988;31:679–81.

  22. 22.

    Klatt GR. Role of subtotal colectomy in the treatment of incapacitating constipation. Am J Surg 1983;145:623–5.

  23. 23.

    Yoshioka K, Keighley MR. Clinical results of colectomy for severe constipation. Br J Surg 1989;76:600–4.

  24. 24.

    Kamm MA. The surgical treatment of severe idiopathic constipation. Int J Colorectal Dis 1987;2:229–35.

  25. 25.

    Hertz AF, Moron CJ, Cook F,et al. The passage of food along the human alimentary canal. Guy's Hospital Reports 1907;61:389–427.

  26. 26.

    Alvarez WC, Freedlander BL. The rate of progress of food residues through the bowel. J Am Med Assoc 1924;83:576–80.

  27. 27.

    Burnett FL. The intestinal rate and the form of the feces. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1923;10:599–604.

  28. 28.

    Mulinos MG. The value of selective drugs in the treatment of constipation. Rev Gastroenterol 1935;2:292–301.

  29. 29.

    Hansky J, Connell AM. Measurement of gastrointestinal transit using radioactive chromium. Gut 1962;3:187–8.

  30. 30.

    Hinton JM, Lennard-Jones JE, Young AC. A new method for studying gut transit times using radiopaque markers. Gut 1969;10:842–7.

  31. 31.

    Connell AM, Rowlands EN. Wireless telemetering from the digestive tract. Gut 1960;1:266–72.

  32. 32.

    Rosswick RP, Stedeford RD, Brooke BN. New methods of studying intestinal transit times. Gut 1967;8:195–6.

  33. 33.

    Ohe MR, Camilleri M. Measurement of small bowel and colonic transit: indications and methods. Mayo Clin Proc 1992;67:1169–79.

  34. 34.

    Bouchoucha M, Devroede G, Arhan P,et al. What is the meaning of colorectal transit time measurement? Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:773–82.

  35. 35.

    Chaussade S, Roche H, Khyari A, Couturier D, Guerre J. Mesure du temps de transit colique: Description et validation d'une nouvelle technique. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 1986;10:385–9.

  36. 36.

    Metcalf AM, Phillips SF, Zinsmeister AR, MacCarty RL, Beart RW, Wolff BC. Simplified assessment of segmental colonic transit time. Gastroenterology 1987;92:40–7.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Dr. Steven D. Wexner M.D..

Additional information

This study was sponsored in part by a generous educational grant from the Caporella family.

Read at The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons' 100th Anniversary and Tripartite Meeting, Washington, D.C., May 1 to 6, 1999.

About this article

Cite this article

Nam, Y., Pikarsky, A.J., Wexner, S.D. et al. Reproducibility of colonic transit study in patients with chronic constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 44, 86–92 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02234827

Download citation

Key words

  • Reproducibility
  • Colonic transit study
  • Chronic constipation