Advertisement

Journal of Child and Family Studies

, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 389–397 | Cite as

Culturally competent outcome evaluation in systems of care for children's mental health

  • Andres J. Pumariega
Guest Editorial

Conclusions

The area of culturally competent outcome evaluation and cross-cultural mental health research in general needs to be greatly developed given the culturally diverse nation we live in and the different needs of culturally diverse children and their families. Such evaluation is crucial in supporting the need for and effectiveness of culturally competent programs and special programs with a focus on particular cultural populations. The imperatives for cost effectiveness and clinical effectiveness which have been promoted by the transition to managed systems of care may actually promote the development of higher levels of cultural competence in community-based systems of care. Culturally competent care may well be the most cost-effective and clinically effective care.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cross, T., Bazron, B., Dennis, K., & Isaacs, M. (1988).Towards a culturally competent system of care. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Child Development Center, CASSP Technical Assistance Center.Google Scholar
  2. Guillermin, F., Bombardier, C., & Beaton, D. (1993). Cross-cultural adaptation of health related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines.Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46, 1417–1432.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Kilgus, M., Pumariega, A., & Cuffe, S. (1995). Race and diagnosis in adolescent psychiatric inpatients.Journal of the Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 34, 67–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Pumariega, A., Holzer, C., & Swanson, J. (1991). Cross-ethnic comparison of youth self report of behavioral symptomatology.Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. Volume VII, NR-119.Google Scholar
  5. Pumariega, A., Swanson, J., Holzer, C., Linskey, A., & Wuintero-Salinas, R. (1992). Cultural context and substance abuse in hispanic adolescents.Journal of Child and Family Studies, 1, 75–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Pumariega, A., Holliday, B., and Holzer, C. (1995).Conceptual paradigms in support of mental health research in immigrant and ethnic minority populations. Alexandria, Va.: NASMHPD Research Institute Technical Reports Series.Google Scholar
  7. Robbins, M. L. (1994) Native American perspective. In: J.U. Gordon,Managing multiculturalism in substance abuse services (pp. 148–176). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Szapocznik, J., & Scopetta, M., & King, O. (1978). Theory and practice in matching treatment to the specific characteristics and problems of Cuban immigrants.Journal of Community Psychology, 6, 112–122.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Windle, C., Jacobs, J. H., & Sherman, P.S. (1986).Mental health program performance measurement. Rockville, Md.: ADAMHA, NIMH, Division of Biometry and Applied Sciences.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andres J. Pumariega
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, James H. Quillen College of MedicineEast Tennessee State UniversityJohnson City

Personalised recommendations