Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

An alternative procedure for analyzing job analysis results for content-oriented test development

  • 60 Accesses

  • 1 Citations

Abstract

Content-oriented test development requires information derived from a comprehensive job analysis. The job data typically consist of task and skill statements identified by subject matter experts. These statements characterize a target job and are then used to develop the test plan and item budget. The predominant practice for combining data from the task and job skill domains to facilitate preparation of a test plan and item budget is an impressionistic approach. This study reports variations and extensions of an alternative quantitative procedure for linking task and job skill data (Hughes & Prien, 1989) using results obtained in field studies. The results indicate that the procedure reported by Hughes and Prien (1989) yields consistent results. Also, modifications to the procedure result in more detailed solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Arvey, R. D., & Faley, R. H. (1988).Fairness in selecting employees (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

  2. Burke, M. J., & Pearlman, K. (1988). Recruiting, selecting, and matching people with jobs. In J. P. Campbell & R. J. Campbell (Eds.),Productivity in Organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

  3. Cattell, R. B. (1978).The scientific use of factor analysis in behavioral and life sciences. New York, NY: Plenum Press.

  4. Dunnette, M. D. (1976). Aptitudes, attitudes, and skills. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.),Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

  5. Fleishman, E. A., & Quaintance, M. K. (1984).Taxonomies of human performance. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, Inc.

  6. Hughes, G. L., & Prien, E. P. (1989). Evaluation of task and job skill linkage judgments used to develop test specifications.Personnel Psychology, 42, 283–292.

  7. Lawshe, C. H. (1985).Job activity checklist. Unpublished instrument.

  8. Lawshe, C. H. (1989).A practitioners approach to job analysis. Symposium conducted at the Fourth Annual SIOP Conference, April 29, Boston, MA.

  9. Peterson, N. G., & Bownas, D. A. (1982). Skill, task, structure, and human acquisition. In M. D. Dunnette & E. A. Fleishman (Eds.),Human performance and productivity. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  10. Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures. (1978).Federal Register, 43, No. 166, 38290–38309.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Andrew J. Vinchur.

Additional information

Dr. Charles Lawshe graciously contributed three sets of job analysis data to this research project. Dr. Lawshe also provided a very thoughtful and cogent critique of our attempts to express these thoughts to a user audience and for this we are grateful.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vinchur, A.J., Prien, E.P. & Schippmann, J.S. An alternative procedure for analyzing job analysis results for content-oriented test development. J Bus Psychol 8, 215–226 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02230386

Download citation

Keywords

  • Social Psychology
  • Field Study
  • Subject Matter
  • Social Issue
  • Alternative Procedure