Advertisement

Cognitive Therapy and Research

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 159–178 | Cite as

Hostile attributional bias in adults

  • James Epps
  • Philip C. Kendall
Article

Abstract

This study tested the validity of hostile attributional bias as a cognitive correlate of anger/aggression in adults. Findings generalized hostile attributional bias into adult populations in ambiguous situations, and extended the construct into benign and hostile situations. Support was seen for the notion that hostile attributional bias is a separate functional entity from simple attribution of intentionality in negative social interactions, with some indication of a tiered cognitive process — attributing first intentionality then hostility of intent. Forced cognitive mediation was seen to have greater effect on angry response in ambiguous situations for aggressive than nonaggressive subjects. The findings are discussed in light of relevant cognitive-behavioral and social information processing theories.

Key words

hostility aggression anger attributions 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, C. A. (1983). The causal structure of situations: The generation of plausible causal attributions as a function of the type of event situation.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 185–203.Google Scholar
  2. Bargh, J. A. (1982). Attention and automaticity in the processing of self-relevant information.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 425–436.Google Scholar
  3. Bargh, J. A., & Pietromonaco, P. (1982). Automatic information processing and social perception: The influence of trait information presented outside of conscious awareness on impression formation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 433, 4337–449.Google Scholar
  4. Brody, L. R. (1993). Gender differences in emotional development: A review of theories and research.Journal of Personality, 53(2), 102–149.Google Scholar
  5. Brunner, J. S. (1958). On perceptual readiness.Psychological Review, 64, 123–152.Google Scholar
  6. Buss, A. H., & Durkee, A. (1957). An inventory for assessing different kinds of hostility.Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21(4), 343–349.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Deluty, R. H. (1981). Alternative-thinking ability of aggressive, assertive and submissive children.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 1061–1071.Google Scholar
  8. Dodge, K. A. (1980). Social cognition and children's aggressive behaviors.Child Development, 51, 162–170.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Dodge, K. A. (1986). A social information processing model of social competence in children. In Perlmutter (Ed.),Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology (Vol. 18), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Dodge, K. A., & Frame, C. L. (1982). Social cognitive biases and deficits in aggressive boys.Child Development, 51, 620–635.Google Scholar
  11. Dodge, K. A., & Newman, J. P. (1981). Biased decision-making processes in aggressive boys.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 90, 375–379.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Dodge, K. A., & Somberg, D. R. (1987). Hostile attributional biases among aggressive boys are exacerbated under conditions of threats to the self.Child Development, 58(1), 213–224.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Dodge, K. A., & Tomlin, A. (1983).The role of cue utilization in attributional biases among aggressive children. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  14. Epstein, S., & Taylor, S. P. (1967). Instigation to aggression as a function of degree of defeat and perceived aggressive intent of the opponent.Journal of Personality, 35, 265–289.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Fincham, F. D., & Jaspers, J. M. (1980). Attribution of responsibility: From man the scientist to man the lawyer. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 82–139). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  16. Fischer, P. C., Smith, R. J., Leonard, E., Fuqua, D. R., Campbell, J. L., & Masters, M. A. (1993). Sex differences on affective dimensions: Continuing examination.Journal of Counseling and Development, 71(4), 440–443.Google Scholar
  17. Gouze, K. R. (1987). Attention and social problem solving as correlates of aggression in preschool males.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 15(2), 181–197.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Guerra, N. G., & Slaby, R. G. (1989). Evaluative factors in social problem solving by aggressive boys.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 17(3), 277–289.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hastie, R., & Park, B. (1986). The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line.Psychological Review, 93(3), 258–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huberty, C. J., & Morris, J. D. (1989). Multivariate analysis versus multiple univariate analyses.Psychological Bulletin, 105(2), 302–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Huesmann, L. R. (1988). An information processing model for the development of aggression.Aggressive Behavior, 14, 13–24.Google Scholar
  22. Kendall, P. C. (1985). Toward a cognitive-behavioral model of child psychopathology and a critique of related interventions.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 13, 357–372.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kendall, P. C., Howard, B. L., Epps, J. (1988). The anxious child: Cognitive-behavioral treatment strategies.Behavior Modification, 12(2), 281–310.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kendall, P. C. (1992). Healthy thinking.Behavior Therapy, 23, 1–11.Google Scholar
  25. Kendall, P. C., & MacDonald, J. P. (1993). Cognition in the psychopathology of youth, and implications for treatment. In K. Dobson and P. C. Kendall (Eds.),Psychopathology and cognition. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  26. Kendall, P. C., Ronan, K. R., & Epps, J. (1991). Aggression in children/adolescents: Cognitive-behavioral treatment perspectives. In D. Popler and K. Rubin (Eds.),Development and treatment of childhood aggression (pp. 341–360). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  27. Milich, R., & Dodge, K. A. (1984). Social information processing in child psychiatric populations.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 12(3), 471–490.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Nasby, W., Hayden, B., & DePaulo, B. M. (1980). Attributional bias among aggressive boys to interpret unambiguous social stimuli as displays of hostility.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 89, 459–468.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Richard, B. A., & Dodge, K. A. (1982). Social maladjustment and problem solving in school-aged children.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 226–233.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Rosenbaum, R. M. (1972).A dimensional analysis of the perceived causes of success and failure. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles. [Cited in Weiner, B. (1985a).]Google Scholar
  31. Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1984).Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  32. Sharkin, B. S. (1993). Anger and gender: Theory, research and implications.Journal of Counseling and Development, 71(4), 386–389.Google Scholar
  33. Slaby, R. G., & Guerra, N. G. (1988). Cognitive mediators of aggression in adolescent offenders: 1. Assessment,Developmental Psychology, 24(4), 580–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Spielberger, C. D. (1988).Manual for the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  35. Spielberger, C. D., Jacobs, G., Russell, S., & Crane, R. S. (1983). Assessment of anger: The Stat-Trait Anger scale. In J. N. Butcher & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.),Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 2). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  36. Srull, T. K., & Wyer, R. S. (1980). Category accessibility and social perception: Some implications for the study of person memory and interpersonal judgments.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(6), 841–856.Google Scholar
  37. Weiner, B. (1985a).An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  38. Weiner, B. (1985b). “Spontaneous” causal thinking.Psychological Bulletin, 97, 74–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Wrightsman, L. S. (1969). Wallace supporters and adherence to “law and order.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13(1), 17–22.Google Scholar
  40. Zuckerman, M., Kuhlman, D. M., Thornquist, M., & Kiers, H. (1991). Five (or three) robust questionnaire scale factors of personality without culture.Personality and Individual Differences, 12(9), 929–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • James Epps
    • 2
  • Philip C. Kendall
    • 1
  1. 1.Temple UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Department of Psychology (BEH-339)University of South FloridaTampa

Personalised recommendations