Ethanol fuels: Energy security, economics, and the environment

  • David Pimentel


Problems of fuel ethanol production have been the subject of numerous reports, including this analysis. The conclusions are that ethanol: does not improve U.S. energy security; is uneconomical; is not a renewable energy source; and increases environmental degradation. Ethanol production is wasteful of energy resources and does not increase energy security. Considerably more energy, much of it high- grade fossil fuels, is required to produce ethanol than is available in the energy output. About 72% more energy is used to ‘produce a gallon of ethanol than the energy in a gallon of ethanol. Ethanol production from corn is not renewable energy. Its production uses more non- renewable fossil energy resources in growing the corn and in the fermentation/distillation process than is produced as ethanol energy. Ethanol produced from corn and other food crops is also an unreliable and therefore a non-secure source of energy, because of the likelihood of uncontrollable climatic fluctuations, particularly droughts which reduce crop yields. The expected priority for corn and other food crops would be for food and feed. Increasing ethanol production would increase degradation of agricultural land and water and pollute the environment. In U.S. corn production, soil erodes some 18- times faster than soil is reformed, and, where irrigated, corn production mines water faster than recharge of aquifers. Increasing the cost of food and diverting human food resources to the costly and inefficient production of ethanol fuel raise major ethical questions. These occur at a time when more food is needed to meet the basic needs of a rapidly growing world population.


ethanol food energy environment pollution 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Batie, S. 1983.Soil Erosion: Crisis in America's Cropland? Washington, DC: The Conservation Foundation.Google Scholar
  2. Batty, J.C., and J. Keller. 1980. Energy requirements for irrigation. InHandbook of Energy Utilization in Agriculture, edited by D. Pimentel, pp. 35–44. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  3. Clark, E.H. 1985. The off-site costs of soil erosion.J. Soil Water Conserv. 40:19–22.Google Scholar
  4. Doering, O.C. 1980. Accounting for energy in farm machinery and buildings. InHandbook on Energy Utilization in Agriculture, edited by David Pimentel, pp. 9–14. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  5. Dovring, F. 1988.Farming for Fuel. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  6. Durning, A.B. 1989.Poverty and the environment: reversing the downward spiral. Worldwatch Paper 92. Washington, DC: Worldwatch Institute.Google Scholar
  7. Energy Research Advisory Board (ERAB). 1980.Gasohol. Washington, DC: Energy Research Advisory Board, U.S. Dept. of Energy.Google Scholar
  8. —. 1981.Biomass Energy. Washington, DC: Energy Research Advisory Board, U.S. Dept. of Energy.Google Scholar
  9. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1990.Analysis of the Economic and Environmental Effects of Ethanol as an Automotive Fuel. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
  10. Federal Energy Administration (FEA). 1976.Energy and U.S. Agriculture: 1974 data base. Vol. 1. Washington DC: Federal Energy Administration, U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  11. Follett, R.F., and B.A. Stewart. 1985.Soil Erosion and Crop Productivity. Madison, WI: Amer. Soc. Agron., Inc., Crop Sci. Soc. of Amer., Inc., Soil Sci. Soc. of Amer., Inc., Pub.Google Scholar
  12. General Accounting Office (GAO). 1980.Conduct of DOE's Gasohol Study Group. Washington, DC: United States General Accounting Office. GAO/EMD-80-128.Google Scholar
  13. —. 1990.Alcohol Fuels. Washington, DC: United States General Accounting Office, GAO/RCED-90-156.Google Scholar
  14. Garst, D. 1990.What farmers want. Washington, DC: Talk to the Agri-Business Council.Google Scholar
  15. Glaze, D.H., S.E. Miller, and C.S. Thompson. 1982. The demand for distillers dried grains in South Carolina.Bull. SC Agric. Exp. Stn., Clemson, SC The Station, Aug. issue 642.Google Scholar
  16. Kane, S., J. Reilly, M.R. LeBlanc, and J. Hrubovcak. 1989. Ethanol's role: an economic assessment.Agribusiness 5: 505–22.Google Scholar
  17. Kates, R.W., R.S. Chen, T.E. Downing, J.X. Kasperson, E. Messer, and S.R. Millman. 1989.The Hunger Report Update 1989. Providence, RI: Alan Shawn Feinstein World Hunger Program, Brown University.Google Scholar
  18. Kuby, W., R. Markoja, and S. Nackford. 1984.Testing and evaluation of on-farm alcohol production facilities. Cincinnati, OH: Acurex Corporation. Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory. Office of Research and Development. U.S. EPA.Google Scholar
  19. Lal, R., and F.J. Pierce. 1991.Soil management for sustainability. Ankeny, IA: Soil and Water Conservation Society.Google Scholar
  20. Lal, R., and B.A. Stewart. 1990.Soil Degradation. Advances in Soil Science. Vol. 11. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  21. National Academy Sciences (NAS). 1981.Feeding Value of Ethanol Production By-Products. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  22. —. 1989a.Alternative Agriculture. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  23. —. 1989b.Irrigation-Induced Water Quality Problems. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  24. National Advisory Panel (NAP). 1987.Fuel ethanol cost-effectiveness study. Final Report. Washington, DC: National Advisory Panel on Cost-Effectiveness of Fuel Ethanol Production.Google Scholar
  25. Nielsen, E.G., and L.K. Lee. 1987.The magnitude and costs of groundwater contamination from agricultural chemicals. U.S. Dept. of Agr., Econ. Res. Ser., Nat. Res. Econ. Div., Staff Re., AGES 870318.Google Scholar
  26. Office of Technology (OTA). 1980.Energy from Biological Processes. Vols. I, II. Washington, DC: United States Office of Technology Assessment.Google Scholar
  27. —. 1990.Replacing gasoline: alternative fuels for light-duty vehicles. Washington, DC: United States Office of Technology Assessment.Google Scholar
  28. Paoletti, M.G., B.R. Stinner, and G.G. Lorenzoni. 1989. Agricultural Ecology and Environment.Agriculture Ecosystems and the Environment 27:1–4.Google Scholar
  29. Pimentel, D. 1989. Agriculture and ecotechnology. InEcological Engineering: An Introduction to Ecotechnology, edited by W.J. Mitsch and S.E. Jorgensen, pp. 103–25. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  30. Pimentel, D., and M. Burgess. 1980. Energy inputs in corn production. InHandbook on Energy Utilization in Agriculture, edited by D. Pimentel, pp. 67–84. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  31. Pimentel, D., and L. Levitan. 1986. Pesticides: Amounts applied and amounts reaching pests.BioScience 36: 86–91.Google Scholar
  32. Pimentel, D., and D. Wen. 1990. Technological changes in energy use in U.S. agricultural production. InAgroecology, edited by C.R. Carroll, J.H. Vandermeer, and P.M. Rosset, pp. 147–67. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  33. Pimentel, D., L. McLaughlin, A. Zepp, B. Lakitan, T. Kraus, P. Kleinman, F. Vancini, W.J. Roach, E. Graap, W.S. Keeton, and G. Selig. 1990. Environmental and economic impacts of reducing U.S. agricultural pesticide use (in press). InHandbook of Pest Management in Agriculture, edited by D. Pimentel. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  34. Pimentel, D., A.F. Warneke, W.S. Teel, K.A. Schwab, N.J. Simcox, D.M. Ebert, K.D. Baenisch, and M.R. Aaron. 1989. Food versus biomass fuel: Socioeconomic and environmental impacts in the United States, Brazil, India, and Kenya.Advances in Food Research 32: 185–238.Google Scholar
  35. Schneider, S.H. 1989.Global Warming: Entering the Greenhouse Century. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.Google Scholar
  36. Slesser, M. and C. Lewis. 1979.Biological Energy Resources. New York: Halsted.Google Scholar
  37. Sparks Commodities. 1990.Impacts of the Richardson Amendment to H.R. 3030 on the U.S. Agricultural Sector. McLean, VA: Sparks Commodities, Inc., Washington Division.Google Scholar
  38. Troeh, F.R., J.A. Hobbs, and R.L. Donahue. 1980.Soil and Water Conservation for Productivity and Environmental Protection. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  39. USBC. 1989.Statistical Abstracts of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of Census.Google Scholar
  40. USDA. 1986.Fuel Ethanol and Agriculture: An Economic Assessment. U.S. Dept. of Agr., Office of Energy, Agricultural Econ. Report Number 562.Google Scholar
  41. —. 1989a.Agricultural Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  42. -. 1989b.Economics of Ethanol Production in the United States. U.S. Dept. of Agr. USDA-AER-607.Google Scholar
  43. USWRC. 1979.The Nation's Water Resources. 1975-2000. Vols. 1#x2013;-4. Second National Water Assessment. Washington DC: United States Water Resources Council. U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  44. Waggoner, P.E. 1984. Agriculture and carbon dioxide.Am. Sci. 72:179–84.Google Scholar
  45. Walls, M.A., A.J. Krupnick, and M.A. Toman. 1989. Ethanol Fuel and Non-market Benefits: Is a Subsidy Justified? Discussion Paper ENR89-07. Washington, DC: Energy and Natural Resources Division, Resources for the Future.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Pimentel
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Entomology College of Agriculture and Life SciencesCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations