Insectes Sociaux

, Volume 34, Issue 3, pp 211–221 | Cite as

New cases of archaic foundatioin of societies in Myrmicinae (Formicidae): Study of prey capture by queens of Dacetini

  • A. Dejean
Article

Summary

During observations in the field, founding queens ofStrumigenys rufobrunea, Serrastruma serrula andSmithistruma emarginata were seen capturing prey and then bringing them back to the nest. These species have an archaic way of colony founding which we studied in the laboratory. It was relatively easy to eraise 10 workers in developing societies ofSerrastruma serrula in 7 months time: other species had slightly fewer workers during the same time. Our particular study was that of prey capture. The queens can locate the prey at a larger distance than the workers. The sequence of capture studied in four situations (small prey, typical prey — active or inert, large prey) are identical to those of the workers. With the exception of the capture of largey prey by the queens of genera with short mandibles (Serrastruma, Smitthistruma), the success rate of capture by the queen is not significantly better than that of the hunting workers in adult societies.

Keywords

Success Rate Large Distance Typical Prey Prey Capture Large Prey 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Nouveau cas de fondation archaïque chez les Myrmicinae (Formicidae): Etude de la capture des proies par les reines de Dacetini

Resume

Des observations effectées dans la nature ont permis de voir des reines fondatrices deStrumigrenys rufobrunea. Serrastruma serrula etSmithistruma emarginata capturer des proies et les ramener au nid. Il y a donc chez ces espèces une fondation archaïque quenous avons étudiée au la boratoire. Le développement des jeunes sociétés en 7 mois permet d'atteindre facilement le stade de 10 ouvriéres chezSerrastruma serrula, un peu moins chez les autres espéces. La capture des proies est particulièrement étudiée. Les reines localisent les proies à une distance supérieure à celle des ouvrières. Les séquences de captures étudiées dans 4 situation (petite proie, proie “Typique” — active au inerte. grosse proie) sont identiques à celles des ouvrières. A l'exception de la capture desgrosdses proies par les reines des genres à mandibules courtes (Serrastruma, Smithistruma), le taux de réussite de capture par les reines n'est pas significativement meilleur que celui des ovrières chasseresses des sociétés adultes.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bovet P., 1983. — Analyse et modèle de trajets exploratoires de fourmis.Bull. Int. SFECA., 2, 33–39.Google Scholar
  2. Brown W.L. Jr., 1953a. — Revisionary studies in the ant tribe Dacetini.Am. Midl. Naturalist, 50, 1–137.Google Scholar
  3. Brown W.L., Jr., 1953b. — A preliminary report on Dacetine ants in Australia.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 46, 465–471.Google Scholar
  4. Clark J., 1925. — The ants of Victoria.Victoria Naturalist, 42, 58–64 135–144.Google Scholar
  5. Cordero A.O., 1963. — An unusual behaviour of the leafcutting ant queenAcromyrmex oestospinosa (Reich).Rev. Biol. Trop., 11, 221–222.Google Scholar
  6. Dejean A., 1980. — Le comportement de prédation deSerrastruma serrula (Santschi) (Formicidae-Myrmicinae). I. Capacité de détection des ouvrières, analyse des phases comportementales.Ann. Sc. Nat. Zool., 2, 131–143.Google Scholar
  7. Dejean A., 1983. — La recherche des projes et le retour au nid chezSerrastruma lujae Formicidae. Myrmicinae, tribu des Dacetini).Bull. Int., SFECA, 2, 21–32.Google Scholar
  8. Dejean A., 1985. — Etude éco-éthologique de la prédation chez les fourmis dui genreSmithistruma (Formicidae: Myrmicinae, Dacetini). III. La capture des proies chezS. emarginata.Ins. Soc., 32, 241–256.Google Scholar
  9. Dejean A., 1986. — Etude du comportement de prédation dans le genreStrumigenys (Formicidae: Myrmicinae).Ins. Soc., 33, 388–405.Google Scholar
  10. Dumpert K., 1981. —The social biology of ants. Pitman Publishing, 297 p.Google Scholar
  11. Hardmann J.M., Turnbull A.L., 1980. — Functional response of the wolf spiderPardosa vancouveri to changes in the density of vestigialwinged fruit flies.Res. Popul. Ecol., 21, 233–259.Google Scholar
  12. Haskins C.P., Einzmann E.V., 1938. — Types of colony-initiation in the Ponerinae and degenereation of wing musculature in the queen.Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 47–162.Google Scholar
  13. Haskins C.P., Haskins E.F., 1950. — Notes on biology and sociakl behaviour of the archaic Ponerine ants of the generaMyrmecia andPromyrmecia.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 43, 461–494.Google Scholar
  14. Höllodobler K., 1938. —Zool. Anz., 121, 66–72. In Dumper, 1981.Google Scholar
  15. Holling C.S., 1966. — The functional response of invertebrate predators to prey density.Mem. Entomol. Soc. Can., 48, 1–86.Google Scholar
  16. Le Masne G., Bonavita A., 1969. — La fondation des sociétés selon le typeMyrmecia chez la fourmiManica rubida. VI. Congress IUSSI, Bern. 137–147.Google Scholar
  17. Levin N.A., 1980. — Variability of olfactory behaviour ofCimex lectularius L. depending on feeding regime.Zh. Obshch. Biol. 41, 940–943.Google Scholar
  18. Weber N.A., 1940. — The biology of the fungus-growing ants. Pt. VI: Key toCyphomyrmex, new Attini and a new guest ant.Rev. Entomol., Rio de Janeiro, 11, 406–427.Google Scholar
  19. Wesson L.G., Wesson R.G., 1939. — Notes onStrumigenys from southern Ohio, with description of six new species.Psyche, 46, 91–112.Google Scholar
  20. Wheeler W.M., 1933. — Colony founding among ants, with an account jof some primitive Australian species.Harvard Univ. Press. Publ., Cambridge Mass., 179 p.Google Scholar
  21. Wilson E.O., 1954. — The ecology of some north American Dacetine ants.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 46, 479–495.Google Scholar
  22. Wilson E.O., 1971. —The Insect Societies. The Belknap Press of Harvard, University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 548 p.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Masson 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Dejean
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire d'Ethologie, UA. CNRS no. 667Université Paris XIIIVilletaneuseFrance

Personalised recommendations