Journal of Quantitative Criminology

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 181–215 | Cite as

Developmental trends of delinquent attitudes and behaviors: replications and synthesis across domains, time, and samples

  • Quanwu Zhang
  • Rolf Loeber
  • Magda Stouthamer-Loeber

Abstract

Inconsistent findings of attitude-behavior relations are commonly attributed to uncontrolled domain, time, or situational factors. Without integrative work, studies accounting for these factors may further complicate research by introducing potentially numerous “third variables” and render a coherent understanding of the attitude-behavior relationship even more difficult to achieve. In this paper, a developmental perspective is taken and the attitude-behavior relationship in delinquency is examined using three modes of investigation: multivariate patterns of attitude-behavior associations, their mutual predictability, and their developmental trajectories. Three grade cohorts of public school boys (n=1517 of the first, seventh, and tenth grades, initially) were followed over a period of 4 years, with an average age span of 7–16 years. Correspondence analyses suggested that adolescent boys with a tolerant attitude toward theft or violence were more deviant than those who had actual behavior of theft or violence. Stronger attitude effect on subsequent behavior, relative to behavior effect on subsequent attitudes, was found among boys aged 10–12 years. While mean scores of tolerant attitudes to serious theft and violence increased linearly with their behavior counterparts between 6 and 17 years of age, ages 11 and 14 were two turning points at which most delinquent attitudes and behaviors escalated at a higher speed. In general, delinquent attitudes and behaviors were related to each other in various patterns, and age was a defining factor that provided much of the explanation for the inconsistencies in research findings.

Key words

attitudes behavior correspondence trends stability 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agnew, R. (1985). Social control theory and delinquency: A longitudinal test.Criminology 23: 47–61.Google Scholar
  2. Agnew, R. (1989). A longitudinal test of the revised strain theory.J. Quant. Criminol. 5: 373–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agnew, R. (1991). A longitudinal test of social control theory and delinquency.J. Res. Crime Delinq. 28: 126–156.Google Scholar
  4. Agnew, R. (1994). The techniques of neutralization and violence.Criminology 32: 555–580.Google Scholar
  5. Ajzen, I., and Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research.Psychol. Bull. 84: 888–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ajzen, I., and Fishbein, M. (1980).Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  7. Akers, R. L., Krohn, M. D., Lanza-Kaduce, L., and Radosevich, M. (1979). Social learning and deviant behavior: A specific test of a general theory.Am. Sociol. Rev. 44: 636–655.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Albrecht, S. L., and Carpenter, K. E. (1976). Attitudes as predictors of behavior versus behavior intentions: A convergence of research traditions.Sociometry 39: 1–10.Google Scholar
  9. Andrews, K. H., and Kandel, D. B. (1979). Attitude and behavior: A specification of the contingent consistency hypothesis.Am. Sociol. Rev. 44: 298–210.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Asendorpf, J. B., and Weinert, F. E. (1990). Stability of patterns and patterns of stability in personality development. In Magnusson, D., and Bergman, L. R. (eds.).Data Quality in Longitudinal Research, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 181–197.Google Scholar
  11. Baggozi, R. P., and Yi, Y. (1989). The degree of intention formation as moderator of the attitude-behavior relationship.Soc. Psychol. Q. 52: 266–279.Google Scholar
  12. Bentler, P. M., and Speckart, G. (1979). Models of attitude-behavior relations.Psychol. Rev. 86: 452–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bentler, P. M., and Speckart, G. (1981). Attitudes “cause” behavior: A structural equation analysis.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 40: 226–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Burkett, S. R., and Warren, B. O. (1987). Religiosity, peer associations, and adolescent marijuana use: A panel study of underlying causal structures.Criminology 25: 109–131.Google Scholar
  15. Carlsson, G., and Karlsson, K. (1970). Age, cohorts and the generation of generations.Am. Sociol. Rev. 35: 710–718.Google Scholar
  16. Cook, T. D., and Campbell, D. T., (1979).Quasi-experimentation: Design & Analysis Issues for Field Settings, Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston.Google Scholar
  17. Davidson, A. R., and Jaccard, J. J. (1979). Variables that moderate the attitude-behavior relation: Results of a longitudinal survey.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 37: 1364–1376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Elliott, D. S., Huizinga, D., and Ageton, S. S. (1985).Explaining Delinquency and Drug Use, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.Google Scholar
  19. Epstein, S. (1979). The stability of behavior. I. On predicting most of the people much of the time.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 37: 1097–1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Epstein, S. (1980). The stability of behavior. II. Implications for psychological research.Am. Psychol. 35: 790–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fazio, R. H., Power, M. C., and Williams, C. J. (1989). The role of attitude accessibility in the attitude-to-behavior process.J. Consum. Res. 16: 280–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. (1975).Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.Google Scholar
  23. Glenn, N. D. (1980). Values, attitudes, and beliefs. In Brim, O. G., Jr., and Katen, J. (eds.).Constancy and Change in Human Development, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 597–640.Google Scholar
  24. Gove, W. R., Hughes, M., and Geerken, M. (1985). Are uniform crime reports a valid indicator of the index crime? An affirmative answer with minor qualifications.Criminology 23: 451–501.Google Scholar
  25. Grasmick, H. G., and Green, D. E. (1980). Legal punishment, social disapproval and internalization as inhibitors of illegal behavior.J. Crim. Law Criminol. 71: 325–335.Google Scholar
  26. Grube, J. W., and Morgan, M. (1990). Attitude-social support interactions: Contingent consistency effects in the prediction of adolescent smoking, drinking, and drug use.Soc. Psychol. Q. 53: 329–339.Google Scholar
  27. Heise, D. (1997). Groups dynamics and attitude-behavior relations.Sociol. Methods Res. 5: 239–288.Google Scholar
  28. Hoem, J. M. (1992). Weighting, misclassification, and other issues in the analysis of survey samples of life histories. In Heckman, J. J., and Singer, B. (eds.),Longitudinal Analysis of Labor Market Data, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 249–293.Google Scholar
  29. Jaccard, J., King, G. W., and Pomazal, R. (1977). Attitudes and behavior: An analysis of specificity of attidunal predictors.Hum. Relat. 30: 817–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jackson, P. G. (1990). Sources of data. In Kempf, K. (ed.),Measurement Issues in Criminology, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 21–50.Google Scholar
  31. Jennrich, R. I., and Schluchter, M. D. (1986). Unbalanced repeated-measures models with structured covariance metrices.Biometrics 42: 805–820.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Jessor, R., and Jessor, S. L. (1977).Problem Behavior and Psychological Development: A Longitudinal Study of Youth, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  33. Johnson, R. E., Marcos, A. C., and Bahr, S. (1987). The role of peers in the complex etiology of adolescent drug use.Criminology 25: 323–340.Google Scholar
  34. Kahle, L. R., and Berman, J. J. (1979). Attitudes cause behaviors: A cross-lagged panel analysis.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 37: 315–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kelley, S., Jr., and Mirer, T. W. (1974). The simple act of voting.Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 68: 572–591.Google Scholar
  36. Kelman, H. C. (1974). Attitudes are alive and well and gainfully employed in the sphere of action.Am. Psychol. 29: 310–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kenny, D. A. (1975). Cross-lagged panel correlation: A test for spuriousness.Psychol. Bull. 82: 887–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kessler, R. C., and Greenberg, D. F. (1981).Linear Panel Analysis: Models of Quantitative Change, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  39. Liska, A. E. (1984). A critical examination of the causal structure of the Fishbein/Ajzen attitude-behavior model.Soc. Psychol. Q. 47: 61–74.Google Scholar
  40. Liska, A. E., Felson, R. B., Chamlin, M., and Baccaglini, W. (1984). Estimating attitudebehavior reciprocal effects within a theoretical specification.Soc. Psychol. Q. 47: 15–23.Google Scholar
  41. Loeber, R., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., van Kammen, W., and Farrington, D. P. (1989). Deveopment of a new measure of self-reported antisocial behavior for young children: Prevalence and reliability. In Klein, M. W. (ed.),Cross-National Research in Self-Reported Crime and Delinquency, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp. 203–225.Google Scholar
  42. Loeber, R., Farrington, D. P., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., and van KÄmmen, W. (1994).Delinquency, substance use, and mental health problems in childhood and adolescence. Unpublished manuscript, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  43. Matsueda, R. L. (1982). Testing control theory and differential association: A causal modeling approach.Am. Sociol. Rev. 47: 489–504.Google Scholar
  44. Matsueda, R. L. (1989). The dynamics of moral beliefs and minor deviance.Soc. Forces 68: 428–457.Google Scholar
  45. Menard, S., and Huizinga, D. (1994). Changes in conventional attitudes and delinquent behavior in adolescence.Youth Soc. 26: 23–53.Google Scholar
  46. Minor, W. W. (1984). Neutralization as a hardening process: Considerations in the modeling of change.Soc. Forces 62: 995–1019.Google Scholar
  47. Nagin, D., and Paternoster, R. (1991). The preventive effects of the perceived risk of arrest: Testing an expanded conception of deterrence.Criminology 29: 561–587.Google Scholar
  48. Nesselroade, J. R. (1991). Interindividual differences in intraindividual change. In Collins, L. M., and Horn, J. L. (eds.),Best Methods for the Analysis of Change, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp. 92–105.Google Scholar
  49. Osgood, D. W., Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., and Bachman, J. G. (1988). The generality of deviance in late adolescence and early adulthood.Am. Sociol. Rev. 53: 81–93.Google Scholar
  50. Paternoster, R., and Triplett, R. (1988). Disaggregating self-reported delinquency and its implications for theory.Criminology 26: 591–620.Google Scholar
  51. Sampson, R. J., and Laub, J. H. (1993).Crime in the making: Pathways and Turning Points Through Life, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  52. Schwartz, S. H., and Tessler, R. C. (1972). A test of a model for reducing measured attitudebehavior discrepancies.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 24: 225–236.Google Scholar
  53. Skinner, W. F., and Cattarello, A. M. (1989). Understanding the relationships among attitudes, group norms, and behavior using behavioral commitment: A structural equation analysis of marijuana use.J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 19: 1268–1291.Google Scholar
  54. Smith, D. A., and Brame, R. (1994). On the initiation and continuation of delinquency.Criminology 32: 607–629.Google Scholar
  55. Sykes, G. M., and Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency.Am. Sociol. Rev. 22: 664–670.Google Scholar
  56. Thornberry, T. P. (1987). Toward an interactional theory of delinquency.Criminology 25: 863–891.Google Scholar
  57. Thornberry, T. P., Lizotte, A. J., Krohn, M. D., Farnworth, M., and Jang, S. J. (1994). Delinquent peers, beliefs, and delinquent behavior: A longitudinal test of interactional theory.Criminology 32: 47–83.Google Scholar
  58. Van de Geer, J. P. (1993).Multivariate Analysis of Categorical Data: Theory, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.Google Scholar
  59. van der Heijden, P. G. M., and de Leeuw, J. (1989). Correspondence analysis, with special attention to the analysis of panel data and event history data. In Clogg, C. C. (ed.).Sociological Methodology, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 43–87.Google Scholar
  60. van Kammen, W., Loeber, R., and Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (1991). Substance use, antisocial, and delinquent behavior in young boys.Youth Adolesc. 20: 445–451.Google Scholar
  61. Warr, M., and Stafford, M. (1991). The influence of delinquent peers: What they think or what they do?Criminology 29: 851–866.Google Scholar
  62. Weller, S. C., and Romney, A. K. (1990).Metric Scaling: Correspondence Analysis, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.Google Scholar
  63. Wohlwill, J. F. (1973).The Study of Behavioral Developments, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Quanwu Zhang
    • 1
  • Rolf Loeber
    • 1
  • Magda Stouthamer-Loeber
    • 1
  1. 1.Life History Studies, WPICUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical CenterPittsburgh
  2. 2.School of Criminal JusticeRutgers UniversityNewark

Personalised recommendations